Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- HallicraftersRadios
- Messages
Search
D-104 fix
g'luck... most of the original elements have gone bad... a few still
linger.? Caveat Emptor Grasshopper...? An article in ELECTRIC RADIO some time back showed the use of KOBITONE elements, which WORK SWELL.? I did a D-104 and it actually sounds BETTER than the working ones I have.? Sources tell me that the particular element specified in the article isn't available, BUT... KOBITONE is verry much around and many other elements will work.? MOUSER used to carry them, but that may no longer be the case...? so do your own diggin' Tom - W?EAJ |
Re: HT-44 - unwanted sideband suppression level?
This is off topic. I need the crystal mic elements found?in a 104 mic ! went to a ham feast, (does it work? oh absolutely? NOT! also a hand full of the mic connectors used in hallicrafters (ht 37, ht 32 etc) we used to call them button connectors?they are on a lot of vintage test gear tnx 73 dan wa0nxe |
Re: HT-44 - unwanted sideband suppression level?
"waltcates" <cateswa@...> wroteHi, Walt The HT-44 manual (beginning of Section II, Northrop version) says: Unwanted Sideband Rejection 50 DB or more at 1 KC. 30 DB or more, 500 to 2500 CPS. Norgaard, in his article on the G.E. 'SSB, Jr.' claimed a worst case rejection of 39dB, and an average of 45dB side band rejection over a 225 Hz to 2750 Hz voice bandwidth, based on the measured degree of error for the two audio phase shift circuits he used. That's probably about as good as it gets, using such a simple circuit. 73, Ed Knobloch K4PF |
Re: HT-44 noise on microphone input
开云体育Shields – in the broadcast world we connect the shield at only one end to avoid hum/buzz pickup, BUT in high RF environments or where conveying RF is required, we connect both ends of the shield. ? Mike Langner ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Thomas Latimer
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2024 11:13 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] HT-44 noise on microphone input ? Thinking it through...that's probably right.? Our cables, of course, ran from one location (switch or hub) to the jack for the computer, so no common metal. On 4/17/2024 12:33, Floyd - K8AC wrote:
? |
Re: HT-44 noise on microphone input
开云体育Thinking it through...that's probably right.? Our cables, of course, ran from one location (switch or hub) to the jack for the computer, so no common metal.Tom Latimer On 4/17/2024 12:33, Floyd - K8AC wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 08:23 PM, Thomas Latimer wrote: |
Re: HT-44 - unwanted sideband suppression level?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:19 PM, waltcates wrote:
The 44 should make -65 to -70db unwanted sideband suppression. Inability to get a good reduction of the unwanted sideband points to audio distortion in the mic amp/modulator train or S3B switch failure.I've been over S3B multiple times and it's clean and all contacts are functioning as they should.? The signal arriving at the grid of the first mixer looks flaky on the scope - not a stable sine wave.? The audio looks good at the plates of? V5.? One thing I don't have is an old fashioned signal tracer that would allow me to listen to the audio path to see where the garbage is being picked up.? I do have a high gain audio amp that I could add a probe to and listen to things that way.?? |
Re: HT-44 noise on microphone input
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 08:23 PM, Thomas Latimer wrote:
Just a thought....sometimes grounding both ends of a cable can cause noise loops.....I pulled a lot of cable back in my youth (Ethernet unshielded TP) but if we had to pull shielded we made sure to ground at one end only.?I think that's been covered in previous comments.? My current belief is that when the cable joins entities that are not in the same enclosure, leaving one end ungrounded may be the way to go.? But within the same enclosure, I think I agree with Richard's comments that both ends should be grounded.? At any rate, grounding both ends of the subject mic cables seems to have made some improvement.? But the noise is still there. |
Re: S20R project
I needed to add another "thanks" note to this thread, since I see the additional wealth of detailed information posted here - definitely this is THE place to seek advice!? It may be another week or so before I can actually commence the work on this S20R, but I will definitely post pictures once I open things up and take stock of what it looks like inside.
|
Re: HT-44 - unwanted sideband suppression level?
开云体育
The 44 should make -65 to -70db unwanted sideband suppression. Inability to get a good reduction of the unwanted sideband points to audio distortion in the mic amp/modulator train or S3B switch failure.
Walt Cates, WD0GOF
?
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Floyd - K8AC <floydsense@...>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 6:53 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [HallicraftersRadios] HT-44 - unwanted sideband suppression level? ?
Making slow progress on the HT-44 but am now able to get very good carrier suppression but don't know what to expect for unwanted sideband suppression.? I can get it down to 50-55 dB below the wanted sideband if optimizing for just LSB or USB, but when
adjusting for close to equal suppression of LSB and USB, I'm seeing around 40 dB for both.? Is that as good as I can expect with the HT-44?
Still have a problem with the noise around 40-45 dB down, very visible on my receiver spectrum scope.? Maybe not noticeable if actually transmitting using a mic.?? 73, Floyd - K8AC |
Re: HT-44 noise on microphone input
开云体育Floyd,Just a thought....sometimes grounding both ends of a cable can cause noise loops.....I pulled a lot of cable back in my youth (Ethernet unshielded TP) but if we had to pull shielded we made sure to ground at one end only.? Tom Latimer On 4/16/2024 19:58, Floyd - K8AC wrote:
I installed a new piece of shielded cable, both ends grounded, from the mic connector to the first mic audio stage and moved the .001 cap to the tube end where the leads could be much shorter.? Also found that the audio cable running to the mic level control that didn't have that end grounded originally was, but with a poor solder joint that broke at some point.? Fixed that and now the noise level seems to be reduced.? But is still ugly around 40-45 dB down from the peak of a single 1 KHz tone.? No idea what a very good HT-44 looks like in that respect - maybe I'm chasing my tail? |
Re: HT-44 noise on microphone input
I installed a new piece of shielded cable, both ends grounded, from the mic connector to the first mic audio stage and moved the .001 cap to the tube end where the leads could be much shorter.? Also found that the audio cable running to the mic level control that didn't have that end grounded originally was, but with a poor solder joint that broke at some point.? Fixed that and now the noise level seems to be reduced.? But is still ugly around 40-45 dB down from the peak of a single 1 KHz tone.? No idea what a very good HT-44 looks like in that respect - maybe I'm chasing my tail?
73, Floyd - K8AC |
HT-44 - unwanted sideband suppression level?
Making slow progress on the HT-44 but am now able to get very good carrier suppression but don't know what to expect for unwanted sideband suppression.? I can get it down to 50-55 dB below the wanted sideband if optimizing for just LSB or USB, but when adjusting for close to equal suppression of LSB and USB, I'm seeing around 40 dB for both.? Is that as good as I can expect with the HT-44?
Still have a problem with the noise around 40-45 dB down, very visible on my receiver spectrum scope.? Maybe not noticeable if actually transmitting using a mic.?? 73, Floyd - K8AC |
Re: S20R project
I have never had much luck in restuffing caps, just don't have the
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
skill. Mostly use separate caps under the chassis but sometimes they are hard to fit in place. On 4/16/2024 2:16 PM, Tom Dailey wrote: Having developed a fairly easy method for restuffing my OWN can caps, I -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL SKCC 19998 |
Re: S20R project
It sounds like you have enough stuff to get going. Jim Whartenby
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
asked good questions I should have asked. The can cap can be replaced by individual caps under the chassis but make sure NOT to just parallel them with the old cap. A good cap paralleled with a bad cap results in a bad cap. Exact replacements can be obtained from Hayseed Hamfest. These are new caps, not restuffed cans. Cost more than individual caps but are in some ways more convenient. These old can caps are what are called "twist lock". They mount with tabs that go through slots around the capacitor hole. When you push tabs through you twist them a little with pliers, usually one or more will be soldered to the chassis to insure good grounding. For soldering these you need an old fashioned large soldering iron, probably available used from the usual web sources. Pencil type irons will not generate enough heat to solder to the chassis, the old ones were what was used to build these sets are necessary in some places. I forgot to mention the accessory socket on the back, do make sure it has a jumper plug. Wiring is shown in the schematic in the handbook. The socket is to allow the use of batteries to run the set and there is another to attach an accessory S-meter. If the speaker has an open field coil it will not work. If its replaced by a permanent magnet speaker the field coil, which also serves as a filter choke, is replaced with a 1000 ohm about 5 or 10 watt resistor. No other changes are necessary. See the schematic for the S-40A, which shows what the circuit looks like. Since you have powered up the receiver all ready it would seem nothing in the power supply is shorted but there may be something open, including the power transformer. Your VOM will tell you right away. Do you have instructions for the VOM? If its electronic its input impedance/resistance is likely about 10 megohms. If a passive meter the input resistance will be rated in ohms per volt, the voltage being the maximum of the range you are using. Modern meters are usually 20k/Volt but they are not all the same. The input resistance can be important to some measurements so its well to know it. The meter used by Hallicrafters was probably 1K/Volt. Two things from the text books: know your tools and know what you are measuring. The scope can be very useful in trouble shooting. If you can fix a dedicated place to work it will be helpful. Also, make photos as you go along. Also, have some means of holding screws and other small parts, I use old prescription bottles because I have a lot of them. The S-20R is fairly simple, should not be too difficult to get it going unless the power transformer is burned out. My guess is that its OK. The S-20R (R means "revised") was the first of a long line of quite similar receivers with cosmetic changes and some component changes. Made to fill a medium priced slot. A good SWL receiver but good enough to use as an entry level station receiver. My first short wave receiver was an S-38B, bought new. Neither my parents (who bought it for me) nor I knew very much and had no help or we could probably have bought a used S-20R for the same money and had a much better receiver. Please let us know how you progress with this. On 4/16/2024 10:50 AM, Bruce KX4AZ wrote: Thanks all for the detailed replies, it is wonderful to hear from S-20R --
Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL SKCC 19998 |
Re: S20R project
Bruce Good to know your skill set!? Curious to know if the power switch has been bypassed or if it has failed in the ON position which is rare, IMHO.? That penetrating oil trick works well so give it a try, it is the least expensive spray.?? Open power switches sometime have an insulating tarnish on the rivets that connect the contacts to the solder lugs.? Wire brush to clean and solder the rivet to the solder contact which may help and is much easier to do then finding a replacement switch. Modern radial electrolytic capacitors are so small that you can leave the can electrolytic in place and install the new caps near where they are needed. If you need tubes, I can supply tested?pulls?(on a TV-7 tube tester) for a buck a tube plus postage from 71901.? I have collected more then I can ever use! Regards,? Jim Logic: Method used to arrive at the wrong conclusion, with confidence.? Murphy
On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 12:50:41 PM CDT, Bruce KX4AZ <bruce@...> wrote:
Thanks all for the detailed replies, it is wonderful to hear from S-20R veterans that have "been there and done that". Some more details on my skill background to help tailor your advice.? I am fully equipped with soldering tools, a VOM (1M input impedance I believe), a 200 MHz Siglent oscilloscope (also 1M impedance), and various signal generators (NanoVNA for CW waveform, TinySA Ultra for modulated waveforms like AM, FM, SSB etc), as well as an assortment of SDRs for receiving signals. The seller advertised it would plug in and light up, so I did that step before viewing the "innards" condition.? Mechanically I am fine with basic clipping/soldering on wires, but do fall rather flat when it comes to building (cutting metal openings, mounting with nuts/bolts).? But it seems like cap replacement is within my skill set, and I should able to check all the tube filaments with the VOM too. |
Re: S20R project
Maybe add an inrush limiter, too.?
KK3HVG
|
Re: S20R project
开云体育
Most of the tubes in that radio will get warm when the radio is on for more than 10 minutes, and that is a good indication if the filament is good, recapping should be done first, as damage can be done if you run it too long with bad caps. Add a line fuse when
you work on it, to protect the power transformer and speaker
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Bruce KX4AZ <bruce@...>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 1:50 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] S20R project ?
Thanks all for the detailed replies, it is wonderful to hear from S-20R veterans that have "been there and done that".
Some more details on my skill background to help tailor your advice.? I am fully equipped with soldering tools, a VOM (1M input impedance I believe), a 200 MHz Siglent oscilloscope (also 1M impedance), and various signal generators (NanoVNA for CW waveform, TinySA Ultra for modulated waveforms like AM, FM, SSB etc), as well as an assortment of SDRs for receiving signals. The seller advertised it would plug in and light up, so I did that step before viewing the "innards" condition.? Mechanically I am fine with basic clipping/soldering on wires, but do fall rather flat when it comes to building (cutting metal openings, mounting with nuts/bolts).? But it seems like cap replacement is within my skill set, and I should able to check all the tube filaments with the VOM too. |
Re: S20R project
Thanks all for the detailed replies, it is wonderful to hear from S-20R veterans that have "been there and done that".
Some more details on my skill background to help tailor your advice.? I am fully equipped with soldering tools, a VOM (1M input impedance I believe), a 200 MHz Siglent oscilloscope (also 1M impedance), and various signal generators (NanoVNA for CW waveform, TinySA Ultra for modulated waveforms like AM, FM, SSB etc), as well as an assortment of SDRs for receiving signals. The seller advertised it would plug in and light up, so I did that step before viewing the "innards" condition.? Mechanically I am fine with basic clipping/soldering on wires, but do fall rather flat when it comes to building (cutting metal openings, mounting with nuts/bolts).? But it seems like cap replacement is within my skill set, and I should able to check all the tube filaments with the VOM too. |
Re: S20R project
开云体育No matter what, definitely replace the main filter caps C28/C29.?? The S20R uses the speaker coil winding as the filter choke and if
C29 shorts, the filter choke may get blasted and go open.? Working
around that with a PM speaker and adjusting cap values, finding a
replacement speaker or using a different choke are all far far far
more trouble than mounting a couple of under-chassis HV caps to
replace the old pair. 73/jeff/ac0c alpha-charlie-zero-charlie On 4/16/2024 10:26 AM, Jim Whartenby
via groups.io wrote:
|