开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: S-20R mixer cct.
Thank you, Don. No, the set was not operating when I acquired it last year. It is dead on all bands. Over the winter I through it and replaced all resistors and capacitors, upgraded the power cord to
By Allthumbs · #31922 ·
Re: S-20R mixer cct.
Thank you, Jacques. The problem is on all bands. I have replaced all the resistors and capacitors in this set except for a large mica cap buried under the oscillator coil assembly. I was hoping not to
By Allthumbs · #31921 ·
Re: S-20R mixer cct.
A DMM and a VTVM are essentially the same. I prefer the term "electronic voltmeter". The voltages for the S-20R were probably taken with a passive VOM. I don't remember if the meter
By Richard Knoppow · #31920 ·
Re: S-20R mixer cct.
Hello Tom Around the HF, especially the LO, I wonder if you can trust a DMM having only wires {no isolation probe } at some pins. It never did work while you have had it? Assume, you tried
By don Root · #31919 ·
Re: S-20R mixer cct.
Hi Tom, The triode section of the 6K8 is effectively not oscillating, and that explain all the voltage readings you got. There should be an open coil somewhere, or an open capacitor in the
S-20R mixer cct.
Newish member of this group, first time posting. I have an S-20R in need of repair. I am not a trained technician and am not particularly good at interpreting symptoms. However, I do have the chassis
Re: For Sale - Hallicrafters R-274/FRR with speaker
Ok Dwight, I’m planning a trip to the observatory in the next few weeks pending weather. I’ll need to get contact and address from you. Do you want a deposit to hold the receiver (and possibly
By Tom Smith · #31916 ·
Re: For Sale - Hallicrafters R-274/FRR with speaker
No, you are the first one to claim it. So I will wait until you are in the area to hand it over to you.? The other Collins radios in the photo are also up for sale.
By dwight_talley · #31915 ·
Re: For Sale - Hallicrafters R-274/FRR with speaker
BTW, have you sold your R-274? Tom ?N5AMA
By Tom Smith · #31914 ·
Re: S-85: how are the RF amplifier tube (v1) and the MIX/OSC tube (v2) coupled in band1?
Well, you and I seem to differ on the value of that thread. I learned several things from folks here who have a wealth of knowledge. 73, Maynard W6PAP
By Maynard Wright · #31913 ·
Re: S-85: how are the RF amplifier tube (v1) and the MIX/OSC tube (v2) coupled in band1?
So new thread started on the same dead horse. how many weeks will this one run? 52 HOPE IT BEGINS TO WORK
Re: S-85: how are the RF amplifier tube (v1) and the MIX/OSC tube (v2) coupled in band1?
So new thread started on the same dead horse. how many weeks will this one run?
By edward schumacher · #31911 ·
Re: S-85: how are the RF amplifier tube (v1) and the MIX/OSC tube (v2) coupled in band1?
Hi Jim , and all; revising numbering makes it tough to compare things !!!! So the Halli C62 function remains despite our communication inability. I guess that it one reason I often take a snip
By don Root · #31910 ·
Re: S-85: how are the RF amplifier tube (v1) and the MIX/OSC tube (v2) coupled in band1?
Maynard FYI S-40 [no suffix] https://bama.edebris.com/download/hallicra/s40techman/s40techman.djvu This seems to have no C62 and looks like “your” 40A at first glance ..SO maybe you have
Re: S-85: how are the RF amplifier tube (v1) and the MIX/OSC tube (v2) coupled in band1?
The S-40B Photofact Folder that I copied calls it C7 but it is still a 2.2 pF cap just as is C62.? Sam's has a format that they follow so their component designations are not the same as
By Jim Whartenby · #31908 ·
Re: S-85: how are the RF amplifier tube (v1) and the MIX/OSC tube (v2) coupled in band1?
Maynard, yes wording is tough. “C62” had been started.. then it moved To me it showed that it was thought to be needed for a simple coil, but not for a transformer .. A version Then
By don Root · #31907 ·
Re: S-85: how are the RF amplifier tube (v1) and the MIX/OSC tube (v2) coupled in band1?
And my S-40A schematic is from Sam's Photofacts (via the Web) and it doesn't have C62 as in your schematic nor does it use independent designation of each component, but labels them with numbers
By Maynard Wright · #31906 ·
Re: S-85: how are the RF amplifier tube (v1) and the MIX/OSC tube (v2) coupled in band1?
Hi, Don, When I said that there is no C62 equivalent in the S-40A, I meant that there is no capacitor like C62 that is connected around the switching and resonant circuits so that it is completely
By Maynard Wright · #31905 ·
Re: S-85: how are the RF amplifier tube (v1) and the MIX/OSC tube (v2) coupled in band1?
Maynard on the S-40A, C62 is in use on band 2 only but connects V1 and V2 like in the B version …I think. We need somebody to LRC a sample switch. Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2025 11:16
Re: S-85: how are the RF amplifier tube (v1) and the MIX/OSC tube (v2) coupled in band1?
Note that the S-40A uses an entirely different arrangement of coils and capacitors and has no equivalent to C62 in the S-40B. So why is the S-40B equipped with C62? Maybe switch S1B in the S-85
By Maynard Wright · #31903 ·