Re: For Sale - Hallicrafters R-274/FRR with speaker
Nice looking setup.? I love New Mexico for the landscape.? You don't see this on the east coast. My step-son lives in Houston. We have driven there a couple of times and know it is a long trip. We
By
dwight_talley
·
#31900
·
Edited
|
S-85: how are the RF amplifier tube (v1) and the MIX/OSC tube (v2) coupled in band1?
This topic raised in the "TRIMCAPs don't peak" thread.
I think it's worth its own thread. Here it is.
In the S-85 there is no obvious coupling between the RF amplifier tube (v1) and the MIX/OSC tube
By
Emanuele Girlando
·
#31899
·
Edited
|
Re: For Sale - Hallicrafters R-274/FRR with speaker
Hi Dwight,
I've attached a few pics of the Pie Town setup. Actually, it's two sites. One is a rolltop with a connected warm room. The other is a hill top site with a typical dome and an incredible
By
Tom Smith
·
#31898
·
Edited
|
Re: For Sale - Hallicrafters R-274/FRR with speaker
Hey Dwight,
Thanks for the email. FB on your Rio Rancho observatory. As you might guess, I¡¯m not up there every weekend for several reasons. It¡¯s a 17 hour drive one way for me from Houston.
By
Tom Smith
·
#31897
·
|
Re: SR-150 and SR-160 QRO modifications
Rick W7IMM,
If you would please contact me offline.
73/Randy WN9D
By
wn9d
·
#31896
·
|
Re: For Sale - Hallicrafters R-274/FRR with speaker
Hey Tom.? I had an observatory in Rio Rancho for a while.? I would love to see your setup.? My wife and I went to Pie Town once and they did not have any pies.? WTF!!!
Let me know when you are
By
dwight_talley
·
#31895
·
|
Re: SR-150 and SR-160 QRO modifications
For several years during the 1970s my only rig was a Heath HW-7 running 3 watts with which I worked over 30 states on 40 CW using an attic dipole. Lots of fun. You can't work everyone you hear with
By
Maynard Wright
·
#31894
·
|
Re: SR-150 and SR-160 QRO modifications
That Dummy is not so dumb?
By
don Root
·
#31893
·
|
Re: SR-150 and SR-160 QRO modifications
Last year I turned the rig on and the band sounded in really poor shape but
there was a station calling CQ and I answered and worked him. Afterwards I
realized why the band was quiet. I was on the
By
Don VE3IDS
·
#31892
·
|
Re: SR-150 and SR-160 QRO modifications
And for proof of the power theory (fact) I just completed a cw Q to Wake Island over the weekend accidentally driving my Acom 1500 which was till tuned for 15M while having the K4 set for 100W drive
By
edward schumacher
·
#31891
·
|
Re: SR-150 and SR-160 QRO modifications
I would tend to agree.
If I am not mistaken,? the SR 500 in good repair and alignment would presumably do somewhere around 250-275W PEP output based on operating it at 500W PEP input.
My HT44 with
By
Rick W7IMM
·
#31890
·
|
Re: SR-150 and SR-160 QRO modifications
The comparison of horizontal sweep tubes vs the 6146 should probably include mentioning the fact that the vacuum tube manufacturers did not use CCS/ICAS ratings for nearly all the? sweeps (some
By
Rick W7IMM
·
#31889
·
|
Re: SR-150 and SR-160 QRO modifications
We shouldn't loose sight of the original topic, which was the use of the 6DQ5 in place of the 8236. The 6DQ5 has a plate dissipation of 24 watts and transconductance of 10.5K. The 6DQ6 is 18 watts and
By
waltcates
·
#31888
·
|
Re: SR-150 and SR-160 QRO modifications
Hi all,
As I recall, there was a bit of a "horsepower" (er, Peak Envelope Power - PEP) thing going on during the late 60s and 70s where manufacturers focused on the 'peak' power (PEP) rather than
By
Robert Kembel
·
#31887
·
|
Re: S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!
Hi, Emanuele,
I hope that you get as much enjoyment from your S-85 as I do from my S-40B.
But Don brings up some interesting thoughts. We might all learn something from all of this. At one point
By
Maynard Wright
·
#31886
·
|
Re: S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!
Emanuele, you can¡¯t get away with this without doing a post-mortem for the benefit of many many others that might go down your road starting where you started. [Smiley-face here]
The coax has
By
don Root
·
#31885
·
|
Re: S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!
Hello Emanuele,
So my intuition was right.
Happy to know that all is good with your S-85 now.
Case closed !
73, Jacques, VE2JFE in Montreal
MEA CULPA!! SORRY!! SORRY!! SORRY!! SORRY!!
By
Jacques_VE2JFE
·
#31884
·
|
Re: SX-117 Power transformer Voltage
Hello Wolfgang,
From the schematic and the "normal" voltages chart in the SX-117 manual, the
primary +B voltage at C117B looks to be 200V.
Which means a transformer HV secondary of 280Vct
By
Jacques_VE2JFE
·
#31883
·
|
SX-117 Power transformer Voltage
Hello,
I am restoring a SX-117. A former owner replaced the original transformer by a transformer with a primary voltage of 220 Volt. The secondary voltage of this transformer is much too high. I
By
Wolfgang dk7cy
·
#31882
·
|
Re: S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!
*MEA CULPA!!? SORRY!! SORRY!! SORRY!! SORRY!! SORRY!!*
As Jacques suggested I had to double check the measuring setup.
Nothing strange in there but a leap of imagination on my part: for convenience
By
Emanuele Girlando
·
#31881
·
|