Tumbs up, Don.

?

?

?

This is unfortunately a continuation of a part of the off-topic stuff that brings down the respect of our forum, but must be done.

Re ??the wording that began in a different topic /g/HallicraftersRadios/message/31466 ?and somehow has been continued in this topic and that continues a dispute is:? ??

“Yes, it is known as the Edison split phase system, see:

”

I previously glossed over the above wording believing that a comma was just accidentally missing, and knowing people often use loose wording to express difficult stuff, however when looking at the quoted link, I see the following: ?

quote ?????

“A split-phase or single-phase three-wire system is a type of distribution. ??It is the (AC) equivalent of the original three-wire ” ?

End quote ???and not “Edison split phase system”

The term “split-phase” is used frequently in the above link , and ?“Edison” is used twice, but not beside “split-phase” or “split phase”.

?

Now, Re?? the previously quoted ?

Here is what I see in that quoted text at the top on my bit-machine and screen with my old eyes:

Ask An Electrician - How Does Edison 3 Wire (Split Phase) System Work?

As I see it , [with? added spaces,color, etc ?for clarity ] the area in dispute says :

Edison 3 Wire ???( Split Phase ) ???System. ?

I read that in my grammar as: ?

Edison 3 Wire ???or ???Split Phase ???System …

Which ?means to me that the system can be identified by either ?

1. ?the term ?“Edison 3 Wire” ???????

????????or

2. the term ?“Split Phase” ??

?????the term ?“single-phase three-wire” is perhaps more clear ?in a multi-phase environment

And intentionally misquoting it as ?“Edison split phase system” and then reinforcing it seems to me to be intentionally part of the “misinformation” society that is plaguing this side of the world. ?

see

?quote

Misinformation is false or inaccurate information—getting the facts wrong. Disinformation is false information which is deliberately intended to mislead—intentionally misstating the facts.

The has affected our ability to improve public health, address climate change, maintain a stable democracy, and more. By providing valuable insight into how and why we are likely to believe misinformation and disinformation, psychological science can inform how we protect ourselves against its ill effects.

End quote ???

--
don??? va3drl

This is unfortunately a continuation of a part of the off-topic stuff that brings down the respect of our forum, but must be done.

Re ??the wording that began in a different topic /g/HallicraftersRadios/message/31466 ?and somehow has been continued in this topic and that continues a dispute is:? ??

“Yes, it is known as the Edison split phase system, see:

”

I previously glossed over the above wording believing that a comma was just accidentally missing, and knowing people often use loose wording to express difficult stuff, however when looking at the quoted link, I see the following: ?

quote ?????

“A split-phase or single-phase three-wire system is a type of distribution. ??It is the (AC) equivalent of the original three-wire ” ?

End quote ???and not “Edison split phase system”

The term “split-phase” is used frequently in the above link , and ?“Edison” is used twice, but not beside “split-phase” or “split phase”.

?

Now, Re?? the previously quoted ?

Here is what I see in that quoted text at the top on my bit-machine and screen with my old eyes:

Ask An Electrician - How Does Edison 3 Wire (Split Phase) System Work?

As I see it , [with? added spaces,color, etc ?for clarity ] the area in dispute says :

Edison 3 Wire ???( Split Phase ) ???System. ?

I read that in my grammar as: ?

Edison 3 Wire ???or ???Split Phase ???System …

Which ?means to me that the system can be identified by either ?

1-? ?the term ?“Edison 3 Wire” ???????

????????or

2-? the term ?“Split Phase” ??

?????the term ?“single-phase three-wire” is perhaps more clear ?in a multi-phase environment

And intentionally misquoting it as ?“Edison split phase system” and then reinforcing it seems to me to be intentionally part of the “misinformation” society that is plaguing this side of the world. ?

see

?quote

Misinformation is false or inaccurate information—getting the facts wrong. Disinformation is false information which is deliberately intended to mislead—intentionally misstating the facts.

The has affected our ability to improve public health, address climate change, maintain a stable democracy, and more. By providing valuable insight into how and why we are likely to believe misinformation and disinformation, psychological science can inform how we protect ourselves against its ill effects.

End quote ???

Barry,

Re ?Your comment about it might be a replacement for the 0.25.? Is the .25 also in the circuit?

?

Re additional Electrolytic Capacitors added in parallel with 2 of the leads from the Multi value tubular capacitor. ?Many people say not to leave the old electrolytics connected since they might short out. There are various ways of dealing with this, and yet keep the can there for appearances.

My guess is that that 0.2 was found to be needed; but perhaps it was factory original on your version?

It is too bad that the general “we” have not accumulated more manuals/schematics for various versions.

?

Barry , you have not seen many replies so I will give it a shot, and I forget what Richard said. ??Oh now I see.. I’m saying the same thing. Oh well, ???

Re? It does not have the C-38 and C-39 silver micas that, according to my schematic, were added to later models of S-38.

Is “my schematic” one that came with the radio? or? ?some later schematic from ??? ??where do they[C-38 and C-39] go??

Re? ?I have found an extra 0.2 @200 V paper capacitor connected between Pin 6 of 12SK7 tube and ground.

?It might have helped stabilize the “almost B+”? voltages at pin 6 [screen] or maybe it is a replacement for the 0.25 . Recall this is a schematic not a wiring drawing, so it theoretically could go either place

?

?

Nick, many months ago I posted a link to the QST 5 page ad for ?the 23

See ??????/g/HallicraftersRadios/message/25703 ?for link

?