开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Re: Website Anniversary

 

Thank you, Bill! This site has been very helpful to me.

73,

Maynard
W6PAP


On 2/8/25 06:54, Donald J via groups.io wrote:
Great site - thank you Bill!

On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 5:52?PM waltcates via groups.io
<> <cateswa@...
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

*Thank you, Bill!*
*
*
*
*
*Walt Cates, **WD0GOF*
*_ <> _*

*A majority of acceptance is not proof of correctness. *

*
<>**
*

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Bill (Group
Owner) via groups.io <>
<k2wh@... <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Sent:* Friday, February 7, 2025 1:29 PM
*To:* [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject:* [HallicraftersRadios] Website Anniversary
Well believe it or not, its been 20 years, this site has been active
and strong for Hallicrafters Radios.
Started in 2005 as a lark, I am amazed we now have 1,075 members.
With thanks to all our Hallicrafters Experts on this site and they
are experts for sure.e
Regards, and have fun.


*K2WH
Bill's QRZ Biography <>
*


Re: Website Anniversary

 

Thanks Bill, you have done a great job over seeing the site.
Skip Magnuson W7WGM


Re: Website Anniversary

 

Great site - thank you Bill!


On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 5:52?PM waltcates via <cateswa=[email protected]> wrote:
Thank you, Bill!


Walt Cates, WD0GOF
?
A majority of acceptance is not proof of correctness.



From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Bill (Group Owner) via <k2wh=[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2025 1:29 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [HallicraftersRadios] Website Anniversary
?
Well believe it or not, its been 20 years, this site has been active and strong for Hallicrafters Radios.
?
Started in 2005 as a lark, I am amazed we now have 1,075 members.
?
With thanks to all our Hallicrafters Experts on this site and they are experts for sure.e
?
Regards, and have fun.

K2WH


Re: Website Anniversary

 
Edited

Took me a while to get here but I am happy to be a member of this group.? Thanks you!
Bob
WB9RHW?


Re: S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!

 
Edited

开云体育

?

Emanuele and all

This is from BAMA for mark 1A and 1B? and makes no sense to me, ???so I rewired it at the right.

What say you all?? Do you go with Halligans version?

Don ?end


--
don??? va3drl


Re: Website Anniversary

 

开云体育

And thank YOU, Walt

Tom Latimer



On 2/7/2025 17:52, waltcates via groups.io wrote:

Thank you, Bill!


Walt Cates, WD0GOF
?
A majority of acceptance is not proof of correctness.



From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Bill (Group Owner) via groups.io <k2wh@...>
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2025 1:29 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [HallicraftersRadios] Website Anniversary
?
Well believe it or not, its been 20 years, this site has been active and strong for Hallicrafters Radios.
?
Started in 2005 as a lark, I am amazed we now have 1,075 members.
?
With thanks to all our Hallicrafters Experts on this site and they are experts for sure.e
?
Regards, and have fun.

K2WH



Re: Website Anniversary

 

开云体育

Bill

Congratulations on the 20th anniversary.....all your work has been appreciated, even by those of us who aren't amateur operators

You certainly have collected a BUNCH of experts

Tom Latimer

And the same to all the people who add support and expertise




On 2/7/2025 14:29, Bill (Group Owner) via groups.io wrote:

Well believe it or not, its been 20 years, this site has been active and strong for Hallicrafters Radios.
?
Started in 2005 as a lark, I am amazed we now have 1,075 members.
?
With thanks to all our Hallicrafters Experts on this site and they are experts for sure.e
?
Regards, and have fun.

K2WH



Re: Website Anniversary

 

开云体育

Thank you, Bill!


Walt Cates, WD0GOF
?
A majority of acceptance is not proof of correctness.



From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Bill (Group Owner) via groups.io <k2wh@...>
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2025 1:29 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [HallicraftersRadios] Website Anniversary
?
Well believe it or not, its been 20 years, this site has been active and strong for Hallicrafters Radios.
?
Started in 2005 as a lark, I am amazed we now have 1,075 members.
?
With thanks to all our Hallicrafters Experts on this site and they are experts for sure.e
?
Regards, and have fun.

K2WH


Re: S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!

 

开云体育

Emanuele ???RE I decided to leave it alone, I give up.? ?Don’t do that, the radio is 99.777% ?, just some strange thing left. It’s ok to take a break and let the brain cool down.

I follow your comments again; all very clear.??

In my sleep, it came to mind that the main dial scale must be set properly. You no doubt have checked this, but maybe there was some slippage since then?

So ?maybe there are set screws on the dial scale hub? .. that might slip?

Also, you must know this but, at low frequencies, the RF tanks will tune much narrower, and so a bit of? unwanted offset will knock the signal down greatly.

Why not do a test: instead of setting the RF band 1 trimmers, at 1400 , set them at ?the low end 600,700? ..and see if they [RF1 and mixer tanks] can be tuned down there by turning the trimmers CW, and if it “aligns”, then try the ?real sensitivity at the low end using the antenna.? If it won’t align there, maybe take a scan of the tanks responses at say 600KCs so you can see if they are too high or too low. I hope you understand my wording. Then you might learn if it ?“tunes low” ?all over the band, or one end is low and the other hi. ?Since you have that Fancy HP gadget you must be able the verify the resonant curves of all tanks at the Hi and the Low end of the band{s}. OF course this is not aligning, it is testing ?to find out where things go wrong. ????????

Must be late there by now spero che tu stia dormendo bene

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Emanuele Girlando via groups.io
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2025 4:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!

?

Guys,

I performed a complete RF alignment once again.

I used a sig-gen and the SA just as a "receiver" to "see" the LO signal and followed the service manual instructions.

LO was fine in all bands with LO signal higher than the signal by the IF value (452KHz in my case) in all bands but the n. 4 where it was below.

The dials track the sig-gen signal with very low error in all bands.

The ANT and MIX trimcaps of bands 1&2 didn't peak, exactly as before. I had to leave them fully released (lower C) to get the MAX output possible.

During alignment the BS dial knob was fully CW and , I confirm once again, the BS cap had the plates all out (minimum capacity).

The radio performs well in all bands but the lower part of band 1 (<1MHz, as before).

?

I decided to leave it alone, I give up.

?

Thank you very much for your precious support, guys.

Ciao.

Emanuele (IU1KNR).

?

?


--
don??? va3drl


Re: S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!

 

Put it aside but don't give up on it.
How did you decide the IF frequency? When the IF has a crystal
filter the crystal determines the exact IF frequency but when there is
no crystal you just set the signal generator to the frequency defined in
the instructions, nearly always 455 Khz. The signal for aligning the IF
can be injected into the converter tube as per instructions, i.e. pin 8
through a 0.02uF cap. Actually, the IF can usually be aligned by feeding
the 455 signal into the antenna terminals. with the signal frequency at
about the middle of the dial. Set the signal generator for a weak
signal, you want no more signal than will overcome noise. Peak the six
adjustments to tune the IF to exactly 455 Khz and also adjust the BFO to
zero beat (also in the instructions. I don't think being off by a couple
of Khz is causing your problems but you might as well do it correctly. I
would go over the three IF transformers a couple of times to make sure
they are peaked and there is no interaction (should not be).
Now, what is going on here? A second receiver, or the SA, can
listen to the local oscillator. Make a sniffer loop to put over the
converter tube. check its frequency over the range on the broadcast
band. It should be 455 Khz _above_ the signal frequency at all points.
At the lowest frequency, say 540 Khz, the LO should be at 995 Khz. Check
it at three or four points up the dial. It should be reasonably close to
the signal plus 455 Khz all over. If you can't find it at the bottom end
start at mid point, or wherever you can receive some sort of signal and
tune down until it stops. What is the result of this? Since the
oscillator works at higher bands its not likely to be a short from dirt
or a bend in the plates but that is sill worth looking for. Make sure
you are not measuring the frequency wrong somehow. The problem is
impossible meaning something is being missed.
Poke at it some more and post back. I am fascinated by this and
don't mind at all trying to help. Lets save this antique, probably a
pretty good receiver when working and I suspect the problem is some sort
of illusion, look at it from a different angle and it may show up. DO
NOT GIVE UP.


On 2/7/2025 1:01 PM, Emanuele Girlando via groups.io wrote:
Guys,
I performed a complete RF alignment once again.
I used a sig-gen and the SA just as a "receiver" to "see" the LO signal
and followed the service manual instructions.
LO was fine in all bands with LO signal higher than the signal by the IF
value (452KHz in my case) in all bands but the n. 4 where it was below.
The dials track the sig-gen signal with very low error in all bands.
The ANT and MIX trimcaps of bands 1&2 didn't peak, exactly as before. I
had to leave them fully released (lower C) to get the MAX output possible.
During alignment the BS dial knob was fully CW and , I confirm once
again, the BS cap had the plates all out (minimum capacity).
The radio performs well in all bands but the lower part of band 1
(<1MHz, as before).
I decided to leave it alone, I give up.
Thank you very much for your precious support, guys.
Ciao.
Emanuele (IU1KNR).
<>

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
SKCC 19998


Re: S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!

 

Guys,
I performed a complete RF alignment once again.
I used a sig-gen and the SA just as a "receiver" to "see" the LO signal and followed the service manual instructions.
LO was fine in all bands with LO signal higher than the signal by the IF value (452KHz in my case) in all bands but the n. 4 where it was below.
The dials track the sig-gen signal with very low error in all bands.
The ANT and MIX trimcaps of bands 1&2 didn't peak, exactly as before. I had to leave them fully released (lower C) to get the MAX output possible.
During alignment the BS dial knob was fully CW and , I confirm once again, the BS cap had the plates all out (minimum capacity).
The radio performs well in all bands but the lower part of band 1 (<1MHz, as before).
?
I decided to leave it alone, I give up.
?
Thank you very much for your precious support, guys.
Ciao.
Emanuele (IU1KNR).
?
?


Re: Website Anniversary

 

Great and Useful site!! Thanks

wa3gin

On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 2:29?PM Bill (Group Owner) via <k2wh=[email protected]> wrote:
Well believe it or not, its been 20 years, this site has been active and strong for Hallicrafters Radios.
?
Started in 2005 as a lark, I am amazed we now have 1,075 members.
?
With thanks to all our Hallicrafters Experts on this site and they are experts for sure.e
?
Regards, and have fun.

K2WH


Re: Website Anniversary

 

开云体育

Happy Anniversary?

Paul Bowman?
KC3FVD?


On Feb 7, 2025, at 2:29?PM, Bill (Group Owner) via groups.io <k2wh@...> wrote:

?
Well believe it or not, its been 20 years, this site has been active and strong for Hallicrafters Radios.
?
Started in 2005 as a lark, I am amazed we now have 1,075 members.
?
With thanks to all our Hallicrafters Experts on this site and they are experts for sure.e
?
Regards, and have fun.

K2WH


Re: Website Anniversary

 

Happy Anniversary!

????? ? Joe Connor

On Friday, February 7, 2025 at 02:29:23 PM EST, Bill (Group Owner) via groups.io <k2wh@...> wrote:


Well believe it or not, its been 20 years, this site has been active and strong for Hallicrafters Radios.
?
Started in 2005 as a lark, I am amazed we now have 1,075 members.
?
With thanks to all our Hallicrafters Experts on this site and they are experts for sure.e
?
Regards, and have fun.

K2WH


Website Anniversary

 
Edited

Well believe it or not, its been 20 years, this site has been active and strong for Hallicrafters Radios.
?
Started in 2005 as a lark, I am amazed that we now have 1,078 members.
?
With thanks to all our Hallicrafters Experts on this site and they are experts for sure.
?
Its been educational.
?
Regards, and have fun.

K2WH


Re: S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!

 

开云体育

Richard what does turning the dial clockwise ?actually mean? If it was a rotating pointer on a fixed scale it is fairly clear that the POINTER rotates CW. And the numbers stay fixed, but on a rotating scale with a fixed pointer, the physical scale might rotate CW but the values on the scale might be going up or down as you rotate. If they had a 1…100 scale ?one could just say turn it to position 1 or 100, but? I fear the use of CW,CCW with Rotating dials or Rotating scales ?can be confusing.?

?

the condition while attempting aligning is that there might just be too much capacitance.. obvious on two bands in 2 tanks each.

So now in this wonky situation, just to see what id going on. Ignore all that and try to get the tanks to resonate higher?? ?by ensuring the ?BS capacitor rotor itself is wide open. ?I thought Emanuele said he did that, but I’m not sure. ??

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Knoppow via groups.io
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 7:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!

?

Note that the direction of the dial and knob for bandspread are
reversed. See instructions about replacing the dial string. The index
mark on the dials is at the LOW end, with capacitors fully meshed. I
read this over carefully. The _band set_ position of the band spread is
with the dial at the high frequency end of each band, that is, capacitor
UN meshed. but the instructions for setting the dials is to fully mesh
the caps and use the index mark at the low end of both dials.
Also, a note states that the LO is at ABOVE the signal on all bands
except the highest (band 4) where it is below the signal (as I suspected).
The problem with clockwise and counter-clockwise is whether this is
the knob or dial direction, because they are opposite. However, looking
at the capacitor plates is unmistakable. Fully meshed for dial stringing
and setting the reference of the dials, band spread fully open when
setting the main dial for frequency and for alignment.

On 2/6/2025 2:25 PM, don Root wrote:

Richard you deleted my image in the reference so others might wonder
about some stuff missing, but no real matter there.

My thought to verify the bandspread is simply to turn the BS dial CW ?
and knob? ?CW and look at the BS capacitor meshing. It should be open!
??right? ?If somehow it is not it needs fixing first.

If it is ok, it’s back to square one. We will have to recruit a real expert.

Richard ?FYI only now:


--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
SKCC 19998

_._,_._,_


--
don??? va3drl


Re: S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!

 

开云体育

Emanuele, this is late.

Your statement here seems to eliminate the idea that the BS setting is the problem.

The other day while taking my truck tire off at a tire place, the hex part of the security nut shattered, leaving a small bit holding the wheel on and no way to get it loose.

Finally today a mechanic guy worked and worked and finally got it out. It takes persistence sometimes.

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Emanuele Girlando via groups.io
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 5:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!

?

Richard, we do cross posted.

Today I also started to think the band spread variable capacitor was stringed reversed..

But I checked it and, in fully clockwise position (the one indicated for alignment), the cap is at minimal capacitance (blades all out).

?

Emanuele (IU1KNR).


--
don??? va3drl


Re: Missing page S2001A

 

?
Thanks Pete. I appreciate the complement.
?
I find it very gratifying that my work helps someone bring a piece of equipment back to life. It also provides me with the joyful option of bringing a possibly bug invested, stored in a garage or basement for 50 of 60 years into a worthwhile and useful document that others can read, use and enjoy.
?
Of course, one can find poorly scanned, incomplete, and highly marked up pages all over the Internet, but even when printed, crap is crap, and stuff is always lost in the transition.
?
I just finished a military manual for a customer. Roughly 200 pages but easy to do even though every page, because of age, was brown. My machine can remove background paper color. But the hicker and hard part, were the five schematics. They were 14 inches high and 52 inches wide. And I decided these were to be done full size. A customer never has to assemble and tape any of my manual pages.
?
This entire project started back in the mid 90's as a bonding project between father and son. Son was in his second high school year but didn't seem to have any idea about his future life endeavors. Since I was dragging boatanchors home to repair and get up and running,?from every hamfest I went to, my collection of manuals for this stuff started to become a pain to manage.? My son created database to manage all the manuals that I also kept collecting. He also suggested creating a catalog booklet, advertising in Electric Radio and a few other publications, and send out the catalog to all interested parties.? I firmly believe this gave him a sense of business activities and helped firm up (or at least give direction) to his future. He also created my first web site and credit him for giving it its name.
?
After? high school he worked for a year before applying and being accepted at Boston Bible College at Hyde Park, MA. He felt he should earn the money to pay for college rather then taking it for granted. For 3 summers while in his college years, he worked at Lucent Technologies as a contractor and used the money earned for tuition.
?
My apologies to the group for rambling, but I'm very proud of my son. I gave him a license manual when he was around seven. When he turned around 27, he finally found the time to become KB1JTP.
?
Pete, wa2cwa
?
?
?
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:50:53 +0000 (UTC) "peteradio@... via groups.io" <peteradio@...> writes:

Pete,

As a loyal customer of yours, who has purchased numerous manuals from you,over the decades, I find your quality, pricing and delivery outstanding!

Keep up the good work and thanks for all the free advice you have provided,and continue to provide, to the amateur community regarding vintage gear!

73's

Pete

W8AA


Re: S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!

 

开云体育

Emmanuel ??Oh I sent? more cross-posting.

Now back at square one ?

Entropy is increasing quickly.

So you are back to the apparent ?too-much capacitance or inductance, and similar problem for 4 tank circuits.. strange…

?Emmanuel ?we don’t know the history so presumably this radio is new to you. did it ever work ok on band one? Is there a sign of somebody mucking about around the coils and bandswitch. Could there be a cross between band one and two tanks maybe due to little clearance?...another longshot

Now I am just wondering out loud, the RF for the 2 HF bands seem to use transformers with slugs, and you can see them on the layout, but for band 1,2 there are trimmers shown but no transformer or coil on the layout so perhaps “L3” has a simple winding for band 1 and another for band 2 ????? same situation and question for the mixer tanks? So what would happen if L3 had a common ground connection terminal and a bad connection to ground ? OR something? ??could L3 have been changed ?another longshot

Another thought; I wonder if the alignment instructions are as complete as for older radios.? My thought is that both ends of the oscillator should be set first and any interaction eliminated by repeating the C22 and C25 ?adjustments etc, then set the RF trimmers. It is hard to see it making a big difference… Richard, Emanule, whoever??

A last resort might be to? find the resonant point of each tank at the top end and the bottom end of the main tuning for bands 1 and then 2. ????

Richard has just added some confusion so this is going now as-is only thoughts.

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Emanuele Girlando via groups.io
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 5:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!

?

Richard, we do cross posted.

Today I also started to think the band spread variable capacitor was stringed reversed..

But I checked it and, in fully clockwise position (the one indicated for alignment), the cap is at minimal capacitance (blades all out).

?

Emanuele (IU1KNR).

_._,_._,_


--
don??? va3drl


Re: S-85 refurbish: I've got a problem during the RF alignment of bands 1 and 2 - trimcaps don't peak!

 

Note that the direction of the dial and knob for bandspread are
reversed. See instructions about replacing the dial string. The index
mark on the dials is at the LOW end, with capacitors fully meshed. I
read this over carefully. The _band set_ position of the band spread is
with the dial at the high frequency end of each band, that is, capacitor
UN meshed. but the instructions for setting the dials is to fully mesh
the caps and use the index mark at the low end of both dials.
Also, a note states that the LO is at ABOVE the signal on all bands
except the highest (band 4) where it is below the signal (as I suspected).
The problem with clockwise and counter-clockwise is whether this is
the knob or dial direction, because they are opposite. However, looking
at the capacitor plates is unmistakable. Fully meshed for dial stringing
and setting the reference of the dials, band spread fully open when
setting the main dial for frequency and for alignment.


On 2/6/2025 2:25 PM, don Root wrote:
Richard you deleted my image in the reference so others might wonder
about some stuff missing, but no real matter there.

My thought to verify the bandspread is simply to turn the BS dial CW ?
and knob? ?CW and look at the BS capacitor meshing. It should be open!
??right? ?If somehow it is not it needs fixing first.

If it is ok, it’s back to square one. We will have to recruit a real expert.

Richard ?FYI only now:

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
SKCC 19998