¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: HT-44 noise on microphone input

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Shields ¨C in the broadcast world we connect the shield at only one end to avoid hum/buzz pickup, BUT in high RF environments or where conveying RF is required, we connect both ends of the shield.

So, one end in microphones for audio shielding, both ends for RF shielding.

And there you have it!

Mike/
K5MGR
_______________________________

?

Mike Langner
929 Alameda Road NW
Albuquerque, NM 87114-1901

(505) 898-3212 home/home office
(505) 238-8810 cell
mlangner@...

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Thomas Latimer
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2024 11:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] HT-44 noise on microphone input

?

Thinking it through...that's probably right.? Our cables, of course, ran from one location (switch or hub) to the jack for the computer, so no common metal.

Tom Latimer


On 4/17/2024 12:33, Floyd - K8AC wrote:

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 08:23 PM, Thomas Latimer wrote:

Just a thought....sometimes grounding both ends of a cable can cause noise loops.....I pulled a lot of cable back in my youth (Ethernet unshielded TP) but if we had to pull shielded we made sure to ground at one end only.?

I think that's been covered in previous comments.? My current belief is that when the cable joins entities that are not in the same enclosure, leaving one end ungrounded may be the way to go.? But within the same enclosure, I think I agree with Richard's comments that both ends should be grounded.? At any rate, grounding both ends of the subject mic cables seems to have made some improvement.? But the noise is still there.

?


Re: HT-44 noise on microphone input

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thinking it through...that's probably right.? Our cables, of course, ran from one location (switch or hub) to the jack for the computer, so no common metal.

Tom Latimer



On 4/17/2024 12:33, Floyd - K8AC wrote:

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 08:23 PM, Thomas Latimer wrote:
Just a thought....sometimes grounding both ends of a cable can cause noise loops.....I pulled a lot of cable back in my youth (Ethernet unshielded TP) but if we had to pull shielded we made sure to ground at one end only.?
I think that's been covered in previous comments.? My current belief is that when the cable joins entities that are not in the same enclosure, leaving one end ungrounded may be the way to go.? But within the same enclosure, I think I agree with Richard's comments that both ends should be grounded.? At any rate, grounding both ends of the subject mic cables seems to have made some improvement.? But the noise is still there.


Re: HT-44 - unwanted sideband suppression level?

 

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:19 PM, waltcates wrote:
The 44 should make -65 to -70db unwanted sideband suppression. Inability to get a good reduction of the unwanted sideband points to audio distortion in the mic amp/modulator train or S3B switch failure.
I've been over S3B multiple times and it's clean and all contacts are functioning as they should.? The signal arriving at the grid of the first mixer looks flaky on the scope - not a stable sine wave.? The audio looks good at the plates of? V5.? One thing I don't have is an old fashioned signal tracer that would allow me to listen to the audio path to see where the garbage is being picked up.? I do have a high gain audio amp that I could add a probe to and listen to things that way.??


Re: HT-44 noise on microphone input

 

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 08:23 PM, Thomas Latimer wrote:
Just a thought....sometimes grounding both ends of a cable can cause noise loops.....I pulled a lot of cable back in my youth (Ethernet unshielded TP) but if we had to pull shielded we made sure to ground at one end only.?
I think that's been covered in previous comments.? My current belief is that when the cable joins entities that are not in the same enclosure, leaving one end ungrounded may be the way to go.? But within the same enclosure, I think I agree with Richard's comments that both ends should be grounded.? At any rate, grounding both ends of the subject mic cables seems to have made some improvement.? But the noise is still there.


Re: S20R project

 

I needed to add another "thanks" note to this thread, since I see the additional wealth of detailed information posted here - definitely this is THE place to seek advice!? It may be another week or so before I can actually commence the work on this S20R, but I will definitely post pictures once I open things up and take stock of what it looks like inside.


Re: HT-44 - unwanted sideband suppression level?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

The 44 should make -65 to -70db unwanted sideband suppression. Inability to get a good reduction of the unwanted sideband points to audio distortion in the mic amp/modulator train or S3B switch failure.


Walt Cates, WD0GOF
?
A majority of acceptance is not proof of correctness.



From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Floyd - K8AC <floydsense@...>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 6:53 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [HallicraftersRadios] HT-44 - unwanted sideband suppression level?
?
Making slow progress on the HT-44 but am now able to get very good carrier suppression but don't know what to expect for unwanted sideband suppression.? I can get it down to 50-55 dB below the wanted sideband if optimizing for just LSB or USB, but when adjusting for close to equal suppression of LSB and USB, I'm seeing around 40 dB for both.? Is that as good as I can expect with the HT-44?

Still have a problem with the noise around 40-45 dB down, very visible on my receiver spectrum scope.? Maybe not noticeable if actually transmitting using a mic.??

73, Floyd - K8AC


Re: HT-44 noise on microphone input

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Floyd,

Just a thought....sometimes grounding both ends of a cable can cause noise loops.....I pulled a lot of cable back in my youth (Ethernet unshielded TP) but if we had to pull shielded we made sure to ground at one end only.?

Tom Latimer


On 4/16/2024 19:58, Floyd - K8AC wrote:

I installed a new piece of shielded cable, both ends grounded, from the mic connector to the first mic audio stage and moved the .001 cap to the tube end where the leads could be much shorter.? Also found that the audio cable running to the mic level control that didn't have that end grounded originally was, but with a poor solder joint that broke at some point.? Fixed that and now the noise level seems to be reduced.? But is still ugly around 40-45 dB down from the peak of a single 1 KHz tone.? No idea what a very good HT-44 looks like in that respect - maybe I'm chasing my tail?


73, Floyd - K8AC


Re: HT-44 noise on microphone input

 

I installed a new piece of shielded cable, both ends grounded, from the mic connector to the first mic audio stage and moved the .001 cap to the tube end where the leads could be much shorter.? Also found that the audio cable running to the mic level control that didn't have that end grounded originally was, but with a poor solder joint that broke at some point.? Fixed that and now the noise level seems to be reduced.? But is still ugly around 40-45 dB down from the peak of a single 1 KHz tone.? No idea what a very good HT-44 looks like in that respect - maybe I'm chasing my tail?


73, Floyd - K8AC


HT-44 - unwanted sideband suppression level?

 

Making slow progress on the HT-44 but am now able to get very good carrier suppression but don't know what to expect for unwanted sideband suppression.? I can get it down to 50-55 dB below the wanted sideband if optimizing for just LSB or USB, but when adjusting for close to equal suppression of LSB and USB, I'm seeing around 40 dB for both.? Is that as good as I can expect with the HT-44?

Still have a problem with the noise around 40-45 dB down, very visible on my receiver spectrum scope.? Maybe not noticeable if actually transmitting using a mic.??

73, Floyd - K8AC


Re: S20R project

 

I have never had much luck in restuffing caps, just don't have the
skill. Mostly use separate caps under the chassis but sometimes they are
hard to fit in place.


On 4/16/2024 2:16 PM, Tom Dailey wrote:
Having developed a fairly easy method for restuffing my OWN can caps, I
prefer them.? Hayseed produces a very workable product, but the
terminals aren't always oriented in the same pattern or position... when
the wiring is short, this makes problems. Just sayin'

Tom - W?EAJ
_._,_._,_

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
SKCC 19998


S20R project

 

Having developed a fairly easy method for restuffing my OWN can caps, I
prefer them.? Hayseed produces a very workable product, but the
terminals aren't always oriented in the same pattern or position... when
the wiring is short, this makes problems. Just sayin'

Tom - W?EAJ


Re: S20R project

 

It sounds like you have enough stuff to get going. Jim Whartenby
asked good questions I should have asked.
The can cap can be replaced by individual caps under the chassis
but make sure NOT to just parallel them with the old cap. A good cap
paralleled with a bad cap results in a bad cap.
Exact replacements can be obtained from Hayseed Hamfest. These are
new caps, not restuffed cans. Cost more than individual caps but are in
some ways more convenient. These old can caps are what are called "twist
lock". They mount with tabs that go through slots around the capacitor
hole. When you push tabs through you twist them a little with pliers,
usually one or more will be soldered to the chassis to insure good
grounding. For soldering these you need an old fashioned large soldering
iron, probably available used from the usual web sources. Pencil type
irons will not generate enough heat to solder to the chassis, the old
ones were what was used to build these sets are necessary in some places.
I forgot to mention the accessory socket on the back, do make sure
it has a jumper plug. Wiring is shown in the schematic in the handbook.
The socket is to allow the use of batteries to run the set and there is
another to attach an accessory S-meter.
If the speaker has an open field coil it will not work. If its
replaced by a permanent magnet speaker the field coil, which also serves
as a filter choke, is replaced with a 1000 ohm about 5 or 10 watt
resistor. No other changes are necessary. See the schematic for the
S-40A, which shows what the circuit looks like.
Since you have powered up the receiver all ready it would seem
nothing in the power supply is shorted but there may be something open,
including the power transformer. Your VOM will tell you right away.
Do you have instructions for the VOM? If its electronic its input
impedance/resistance is likely about 10 megohms. If a passive meter the
input resistance will be rated in ohms per volt, the voltage being the
maximum of the range you are using. Modern meters are usually 20k/Volt
but they are not all the same. The input resistance can be important to
some measurements so its well to know it. The meter used by
Hallicrafters was probably 1K/Volt.
Two things from the text books: know your tools and know what you
are measuring.
The scope can be very useful in trouble shooting.
If you can fix a dedicated place to work it will be helpful. Also,
make photos as you go along. Also, have some means of holding screws and
other small parts, I use old prescription bottles because I have a lot
of them.
The S-20R is fairly simple, should not be too difficult to get it
going unless the power transformer is burned out. My guess is that its OK.
The S-20R (R means "revised") was the first of a long line of quite
similar receivers with cosmetic changes and some component changes. Made
to fill a medium priced slot. A good SWL receiver but good enough to use
as an entry level station receiver. My first short wave receiver was an
S-38B, bought new. Neither my parents (who bought it for me) nor I knew
very much and had no help or we could probably have bought a used S-20R
for the same money and had a much better receiver.
Please let us know how you progress with this.


On 4/16/2024 10:50 AM, Bruce KX4AZ wrote:
Thanks all for the detailed replies, it is wonderful to hear from S-20R
veterans that have "been there and done that".

Some more details on my skill background to help tailor your advice.? I
am fully equipped with soldering tools, a VOM (1M input impedance I
believe), a 200 MHz Siglent oscilloscope (also 1M impedance), and
various signal generators (NanoVNA for CW waveform, TinySA Ultra for
/modulated/ waveforms like AM, FM, SSB etc), as well as an assortment of
SDRs for receiving signals.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
SKCC 19998


Re: S20R project

 

Bruce
Good to know your skill set!? Curious to know if the power switch has been bypassed or if it has failed in the ON position which is rare, IMHO.? That penetrating oil trick works well so give it a try, it is the least expensive spray.??

Open power switches sometime have an insulating tarnish on the rivets that connect the contacts to the solder lugs.? Wire brush to clean and solder the rivet to the solder contact which may help and is much easier to do then finding a replacement switch.

Modern radial electrolytic capacitors are so small that you can leave the can electrolytic in place and install the new caps near where they are needed.

If you need tubes, I can supply tested?pulls?(on a TV-7 tube tester) for a buck a tube plus postage from 71901.? I have collected more then I can ever use!
Regards,?
Jim

Logic: Method used to arrive at the wrong conclusion, with confidence.? Murphy


On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 12:50:41 PM CDT, Bruce KX4AZ <bruce@...> wrote:


Thanks all for the detailed replies, it is wonderful to hear from S-20R veterans that have "been there and done that".

Some more details on my skill background to help tailor your advice.? I am fully equipped with soldering tools, a VOM (1M input impedance I believe), a 200 MHz Siglent oscilloscope (also 1M impedance), and various signal generators (NanoVNA for CW waveform, TinySA Ultra for modulated waveforms like AM, FM, SSB etc), as well as an assortment of SDRs for receiving signals.

The seller advertised it would plug in and light up, so I did that step before viewing the "innards" condition.? Mechanically I am fine with basic clipping/soldering on wires, but do fall rather flat when it comes to building (cutting metal openings, mounting with nuts/bolts).? But it seems like cap replacement is within my skill set, and I should able to check all the tube filaments with the VOM too.


Re: S20R project

 

Maybe add an inrush limiter, too.?
KK3HVG

On 04/16/2024 1:58 PM EDT Scott Petersen <s-petersen@...> wrote:
?
?
Most of the tubes in that radio will get warm when the radio is on for more than 10 minutes, and that is a good indication if the filament is good, recapping should be done first, as damage can be done if you run it too long with bad caps. Add a line fuse when you work on it, to protect the power transformer and speaker
?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Bruce KX4AZ <bruce@...>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 1:50 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] S20R project
?
Thanks all for the detailed replies, it is wonderful to hear from S-20R veterans that have "been there and done that".

Some more details on my skill background to help tailor your advice.? I am fully equipped with soldering tools, a VOM (1M input impedance I believe), a 200 MHz Siglent oscilloscope (also 1M impedance), and various signal generators (NanoVNA for CW waveform, TinySA Ultra for modulated waveforms like AM, FM, SSB etc), as well as an assortment of SDRs for receiving signals.

The seller advertised it would plug in and light up, so I did that step before viewing the "innards" condition.? Mechanically I am fine with basic clipping/soldering on wires, but do fall rather flat when it comes to building (cutting metal openings, mounting with nuts/bolts).? But it seems like cap replacement is within my skill set, and I should able to check all the tube filaments with the VOM too.


Re: S20R project

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Most of the tubes in that radio will get warm when the radio is on for more than 10 minutes, and that is a good indication if the filament is good, recapping should be done first, as damage can be done if you run it too long with bad caps. Add a line fuse when you work on it, to protect the power transformer and speaker


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Bruce KX4AZ <bruce@...>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 1:50 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] S20R project
?
Thanks all for the detailed replies, it is wonderful to hear from S-20R veterans that have "been there and done that".

Some more details on my skill background to help tailor your advice.? I am fully equipped with soldering tools, a VOM (1M input impedance I believe), a 200 MHz Siglent oscilloscope (also 1M impedance), and various signal generators (NanoVNA for CW waveform, TinySA Ultra for modulated waveforms like AM, FM, SSB etc), as well as an assortment of SDRs for receiving signals.

The seller advertised it would plug in and light up, so I did that step before viewing the "innards" condition.? Mechanically I am fine with basic clipping/soldering on wires, but do fall rather flat when it comes to building (cutting metal openings, mounting with nuts/bolts).? But it seems like cap replacement is within my skill set, and I should able to check all the tube filaments with the VOM too.


Re: S20R project

 

Thanks all for the detailed replies, it is wonderful to hear from S-20R veterans that have "been there and done that".

Some more details on my skill background to help tailor your advice.? I am fully equipped with soldering tools, a VOM (1M input impedance I believe), a 200 MHz Siglent oscilloscope (also 1M impedance), and various signal generators (NanoVNA for CW waveform, TinySA Ultra for modulated waveforms like AM, FM, SSB etc), as well as an assortment of SDRs for receiving signals.

The seller advertised it would plug in and light up, so I did that step before viewing the "innards" condition.? Mechanically I am fine with basic clipping/soldering on wires, but do fall rather flat when it comes to building (cutting metal openings, mounting with nuts/bolts).? But it seems like cap replacement is within my skill set, and I should able to check all the tube filaments with the VOM too.


Re: S20R project

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

No matter what, definitely replace the main filter caps C28/C29.??

The S20R uses the speaker coil winding as the filter choke and if C29 shorts, the filter choke may get blasted and go open.? Working around that with a PM speaker and adjusting cap values, finding a replacement speaker or using a different choke are all far far far more trouble than mounting a couple of under-chassis HV caps to replace the old pair.

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
On 4/16/2024 10:26 AM, Jim Whartenby via groups.io wrote:

Bruce
Tell us about yourself.? What is your electronics skill level?? What test equipment is available?? Hand tools, soldering iron, tube tester, test meter and such.? Have you mastered the skill of soldering?? Can you read a schematic?? I am sure that we as a group can guide you through the repair process even if you are a beginner.

I personally would not apply power until I have had a look under the hood, so to speak.? All filter, coupling and bypass capacitors are suspect and should be considered bad and in need of replacement.? As Richard said, if the resistors checked are within 20% then I would think that they are good enough.? There is an octal socket on the rear apron.? There should be a plug installed with two jumpers, is that there?

About the switch problems.? I have found that the dollar store can of penetrating oil spray will do wonders on switches and volume controls.? Just spray and operate the control a few dozen times to work the fluid into the switch / pot.? You can verify operation with your VOM.
Regards,
Jim

Logic: Method used to arrive at the wrong conclusion, with confidence.? Murphy


On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 08:36:45 AM CDT, Richard Knoppow <1oldlens1@...> wrote:


You will definitely have to remove the bottom cover. Simple, a few
screws. The S20R is a straight forward receiver and not difficult to
work on. When restored they are quite good performers and worth the
trouble.
What instruments do you have? To start out you must have a VOM
(Volt-Ohm-Milliamp) meter. Even a very simple one will do. Perfectly
adequate meters are available at places like Harbor Tools for around
$15.00. Without one you can't do very much.
I also suggest looking at tubebooks.org at books on trouble shooting.
A couple of first suggestions: look at the rec/send switch to see if
its working. Use the ohm meter first. Secondly, check the switch in the
headphone jack. If its not connecting the speaker you won't hear
anything. Plugging into the jack a few times may clear the contact. Note
that the headphones are connected to the audio driver stage so the
phones must be high impedance to hear anything there. Old fashioned
magnetic phones, of the sort used for crystal radios, are required.
Do measure the resistance of the tube filaments. That will at least
eliminate any complete duds but burned out filaments are actually quite
rare.
Once you have a VOM do the socket resistance checks. A variation of
20% is normal. It is helpful to follow the schematic when doing the
measurements so you know what you are measuring. In some places there
may be capacitors involved so that the measurements will change with
time and perhaps polarity without indicating anything wrong.
Then do the socket voltage checks. This requires removing the bottom
cover. If you are not used to vacuum tube gear watch your fingers, you
can get quite painful shocks.
For general trouble shooting always begin with the power supply. If
the power supply is not working nothing else will work.
Again, in general, begin at one end and work toward the other, from
input to output, or sometimes the other way. Do ONE thing at a time so
you know what has changed.
Thoroughly clean all the switches before you begin. Evidently the
power switch gave up since it appears to have been bypassed. This is on
the tone control switch and is an add-on type switch. I had to replace
the switch on my S-40A, which is almost identical to the S-20R. It may
be the Send/receive switch is also kaput, look at its terminals with the
ohm meter to see if its working. This is a plain Jane toggle switch so
will be relatively easy to replace.
All the tubes in the S-20R were originally metal except for the
rectifier. There are glass (GT) versions of all of them but the metal
ones provide some additional shielding. If your tubes turn out to be
good just leave them.
All the paper and electrolytic caps will have to be replaced. An
original can type filter cap is available from Hayseed Hamfest. He may
also have a kit of other caps. Modern plastic caps will much improve the
performance of the receiver. There is one low inductance cap in the RF
section, has a woven lead at one end. Just replace it with a modern
plastic cap, they have much lower parasitic reactance than the original
paper caps.
You will have to go over the resistors. Carbon composition
resistors invariably increase in value with time. You will probably find
that all resistors with values of 50K and above are way out of
tolerance. Modern carbon film resistors are better than the old ones
when new and will last forever. Probably any resistor with value within
20% can be left in place.
Since most S-20R receivers were built in war time or shortly
afterward you may find some "bult up" resistors consisting of paralleled
resistors where the right value was not available.
Note that the original speaker is electrodynamic, that is, the
magnet is an electromagnet and acts as a choke for the power supply.
Mostly they are still good. If the speaker does have to be replaced for
some reason a permanent magnet speaker can be used with the field coil
replaced with a 1000 ohm about 5 Watt wire wound resistor. See the
S-40A, which is nearly identical, to see how this is done.
In my S-20R I replaced the detector and noise limiter with the
circuit from the S-40A but the original works OK.
If you have questions I will try to answer them plus you will get a
lot of help from others on this list.
There is an old book "Modern Radio Servicing" by Girardi (not sure
of the spelling) which is helpful, I think its at tubebooks.org
Good luck, neat receivers.

On 4/16/2024 4:39 AM, Bruce KX4AZ wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:19 AM, Bruce KX4AZ wrote:

....decided to take a chance on an Ebay sale of an "as is" unit.
The cosmetic appearance didn't look too bad, and the fact that it
powers on with at least /a /hiss?in the speaker, /and/ that it was
part of a ham estate,? gave me just enough hope to make an offer
that was accepted.? But once I have it in hand I will need to lean
heavily on the S20R experts here, since I have limited skills
(truthfully, ZERO) with regard to troubleshooting and/or restoring
tube radios of this type.

An update on this, I received the S20R boat anchor last week, and I was
encouraged by the above average cosmetic appearance of the cabinet, and
the fact that the power cord had previously been replaced.? The unit
powers on as soon as plugged in (power switch bypassed?), with dial
lights and tube filaments illuminated....at least the tubes with a glass
enclosure.? But there is absolutely nothing detectable from the speaker,
not even a hiss of any kind.? I have the schematic and service manuals
in hand...but I am pondering what the next most logical steps might be.
I am thinking that would be to open the chassis cover to see if any of
the caps etc have already been replaced.? Would checking for the
presence of B+ voltage be another key step? And I suppose checking the
filaments on the non-glass tubes would make sense too.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
SKCC 19998


Re: S20R project

 

Bruce
Tell us about yourself.? What is your electronics skill level?? What test equipment is available?? Hand tools, soldering iron, tube tester, test meter and such.? Have you mastered the skill of soldering?? Can you read a schematic?? I am sure that we as a group can guide you through the repair process even if you are a beginner.

I personally would not apply power until I have had a look under the hood, so to speak.? All filter, coupling and bypass capacitors are suspect and should be considered bad and in need of replacement.? As Richard said, if the resistors checked are within 20% then I would think that they are good enough.? There is an octal socket on the rear apron.? There should be a plug installed with two jumpers, is that there?

About the switch problems.? I have found that the dollar store can of penetrating oil spray will do wonders on switches and volume controls.? Just spray and operate the control a few dozen times to work the fluid into the switch / pot.? You can verify operation with your VOM.
Regards,
Jim

Logic: Method used to arrive at the wrong conclusion, with confidence.? Murphy


On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 08:36:45 AM CDT, Richard Knoppow <1oldlens1@...> wrote:


You will definitely have to remove the bottom cover. Simple, a few
screws. The S20R is a straight forward receiver and not difficult to
work on. When restored they are quite good performers and worth the
trouble.
What instruments do you have? To start out you must have a VOM
(Volt-Ohm-Milliamp) meter. Even a very simple one will do. Perfectly
adequate meters are available at places like Harbor Tools for around
$15.00. Without one you can't do very much.
I also suggest looking at tubebooks.org at books on trouble shooting.
A couple of first suggestions: look at the rec/send switch to see if
its working. Use the ohm meter first. Secondly, check the switch in the
headphone jack. If its not connecting the speaker you won't hear
anything. Plugging into the jack a few times may clear the contact. Note
that the headphones are connected to the audio driver stage so the
phones must be high impedance to hear anything there. Old fashioned
magnetic phones, of the sort used for crystal radios, are required.
Do measure the resistance of the tube filaments. That will at least
eliminate any complete duds but burned out filaments are actually quite
rare.
Once you have a VOM do the socket resistance checks. A variation of
20% is normal. It is helpful to follow the schematic when doing the
measurements so you know what you are measuring. In some places there
may be capacitors involved so that the measurements will change with
time and perhaps polarity without indicating anything wrong.
Then do the socket voltage checks. This requires removing the bottom
cover. If you are not used to vacuum tube gear watch your fingers, you
can get quite painful shocks.
For general trouble shooting always begin with the power supply. If
the power supply is not working nothing else will work.
Again, in general, begin at one end and work toward the other, from
input to output, or sometimes the other way. Do ONE thing at a time so
you know what has changed.
Thoroughly clean all the switches before you begin. Evidently the
power switch gave up since it appears to have been bypassed. This is on
the tone control switch and is an add-on type switch. I had to replace
the switch on my S-40A, which is almost identical to the S-20R. It may
be the Send/receive switch is also kaput, look at its terminals with the
ohm meter to see if its working. This is a plain Jane toggle switch so
will be relatively easy to replace.
All the tubes in the S-20R were originally metal except for the
rectifier. There are glass (GT) versions of all of them but the metal
ones provide some additional shielding. If your tubes turn out to be
good just leave them.
All the paper and electrolytic caps will have to be replaced. An
original can type filter cap is available from Hayseed Hamfest. He may
also have a kit of other caps. Modern plastic caps will much improve the
performance of the receiver. There is one low inductance cap in the RF
section, has a woven lead at one end. Just replace it with a modern
plastic cap, they have much lower parasitic reactance than the original
paper caps.
You will have to go over the resistors. Carbon composition
resistors invariably increase in value with time. You will probably find
that all resistors with values of 50K and above are way out of
tolerance. Modern carbon film resistors are better than the old ones
when new and will last forever. Probably any resistor with value within
20% can be left in place.
Since most S-20R receivers were built in war time or shortly
afterward you may find some "bult up" resistors consisting of paralleled
resistors where the right value was not available.
Note that the original speaker is electrodynamic, that is, the
magnet is an electromagnet and acts as a choke for the power supply.
Mostly they are still good. If the speaker does have to be replaced for
some reason a permanent magnet speaker can be used with the field coil
replaced with a 1000 ohm about 5 Watt wire wound resistor. See the
S-40A, which is nearly identical, to see how this is done.
In my S-20R I replaced the detector and noise limiter with the
circuit from the S-40A but the original works OK.
If you have questions I will try to answer them plus you will get a
lot of help from others on this list.
There is an old book "Modern Radio Servicing" by Girardi (not sure
of the spelling) which is helpful, I think its at tubebooks.org
Good luck, neat receivers.


On 4/16/2024 4:39 AM, Bruce KX4AZ wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:19 AM, Bruce KX4AZ wrote:

....decided to take a chance on an Ebay sale of an "as is" unit.
The cosmetic appearance didn't look too bad, and the fact that it
powers on with at least /a /hiss?in the speaker, /and/ that it was
part of a ham estate,? gave me just enough hope to make an offer
that was accepted.? But once I have it in hand I will need to lean
heavily on the S20R experts here, since I have limited skills
(truthfully, ZERO) with regard to troubleshooting and/or restoring
tube radios of this type.

An update on this, I received the S20R boat anchor last week, and I was
encouraged by the above average cosmetic appearance of the cabinet, and
the fact that the power cord had previously been replaced.? The unit
powers on as soon as plugged in (power switch bypassed?), with dial
lights and tube filaments illuminated....at least the tubes with a glass
enclosure.? But there is absolutely nothing detectable from the speaker,
not even a hiss of any kind.? I have the schematic and service manuals
in hand...but I am pondering what the next most logical steps might be.
I am thinking that would be to open the chassis cover to see if any of
the caps etc have already been replaced.? Would checking for the
presence of B+ voltage be another key step? And I suppose checking the
filaments on the non-glass tubes would make sense too.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
SKCC 19998


Re: S20R project

 

You will definitely have to remove the bottom cover. Simple, a few
screws. The S20R is a straight forward receiver and not difficult to
work on. When restored they are quite good performers and worth the
trouble.
What instruments do you have? To start out you must have a VOM
(Volt-Ohm-Milliamp) meter. Even a very simple one will do. Perfectly
adequate meters are available at places like Harbor Tools for around
$15.00. Without one you can't do very much.
I also suggest looking at tubebooks.org at books on trouble shooting.
A couple of first suggestions: look at the rec/send switch to see if
its working. Use the ohm meter first. Secondly, check the switch in the
headphone jack. If its not connecting the speaker you won't hear
anything. Plugging into the jack a few times may clear the contact. Note
that the headphones are connected to the audio driver stage so the
phones must be high impedance to hear anything there. Old fashioned
magnetic phones, of the sort used for crystal radios, are required.
Do measure the resistance of the tube filaments. That will at least
eliminate any complete duds but burned out filaments are actually quite
rare.
Once you have a VOM do the socket resistance checks. A variation of
20% is normal. It is helpful to follow the schematic when doing the
measurements so you know what you are measuring. In some places there
may be capacitors involved so that the measurements will change with
time and perhaps polarity without indicating anything wrong.
Then do the socket voltage checks. This requires removing the bottom
cover. If you are not used to vacuum tube gear watch your fingers, you
can get quite painful shocks.
For general trouble shooting always begin with the power supply. If
the power supply is not working nothing else will work.
Again, in general, begin at one end and work toward the other, from
input to output, or sometimes the other way. Do ONE thing at a time so
you know what has changed.
Thoroughly clean all the switches before you begin. Evidently the
power switch gave up since it appears to have been bypassed. This is on
the tone control switch and is an add-on type switch. I had to replace
the switch on my S-40A, which is almost identical to the S-20R. It may
be the Send/receive switch is also kaput, look at its terminals with the
ohm meter to see if its working. This is a plain Jane toggle switch so
will be relatively easy to replace.
All the tubes in the S-20R were originally metal except for the
rectifier. There are glass (GT) versions of all of them but the metal
ones provide some additional shielding. If your tubes turn out to be
good just leave them.
All the paper and electrolytic caps will have to be replaced. An
original can type filter cap is available from Hayseed Hamfest. He may
also have a kit of other caps. Modern plastic caps will much improve the
performance of the receiver. There is one low inductance cap in the RF
section, has a woven lead at one end. Just replace it with a modern
plastic cap, they have much lower parasitic reactance than the original
paper caps.
You will have to go over the resistors. Carbon composition
resistors invariably increase in value with time. You will probably find
that all resistors with values of 50K and above are way out of
tolerance. Modern carbon film resistors are better than the old ones
when new and will last forever. Probably any resistor with value within
20% can be left in place.
Since most S-20R receivers were built in war time or shortly
afterward you may find some "bult up" resistors consisting of paralleled
resistors where the right value was not available.
Note that the original speaker is electrodynamic, that is, the
magnet is an electromagnet and acts as a choke for the power supply.
Mostly they are still good. If the speaker does have to be replaced for
some reason a permanent magnet speaker can be used with the field coil
replaced with a 1000 ohm about 5 Watt wire wound resistor. See the
S-40A, which is nearly identical, to see how this is done.
In my S-20R I replaced the detector and noise limiter with the
circuit from the S-40A but the original works OK.
If you have questions I will try to answer them plus you will get a
lot of help from others on this list.
There is an old book "Modern Radio Servicing" by Girardi (not sure
of the spelling) which is helpful, I think its at tubebooks.org
Good luck, neat receivers.


On 4/16/2024 4:39 AM, Bruce KX4AZ wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:19 AM, Bruce KX4AZ wrote:

....decided to take a chance on an Ebay sale of an "as is" unit.
The cosmetic appearance didn't look too bad, and the fact that it
powers on with at least /a /hiss?in the speaker, /and/ that it was
part of a ham estate,? gave me just enough hope to make an offer
that was accepted.? But once I have it in hand I will need to lean
heavily on the S20R experts here, since I have limited skills
(truthfully, ZERO) with regard to troubleshooting and/or restoring
tube radios of this type.

An update on this, I received the S20R boat anchor last week, and I was
encouraged by the above average cosmetic appearance of the cabinet, and
the fact that the power cord had previously been replaced.? The unit
powers on as soon as plugged in (power switch bypassed?), with dial
lights and tube filaments illuminated....at least the tubes with a glass
enclosure.? But there is absolutely nothing detectable from the speaker,
not even a hiss of any kind.? I have the schematic and service manuals
in hand...but I am pondering what the next most logical steps might be.
I am thinking that would be to open the chassis cover to see if any of
the caps etc have already been replaced.? Would checking for the
presence of B+ voltage be another key step? And I suppose checking the
filaments on the non-glass tubes would make sense too.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
SKCC 19998


Re: Hallicrafters HT-9

 

I picked up my two HT-9s from the Claremore, OK hamfest this past weekend. They were as advertised and even the second one was in great shape despite a few somewhat reversible modifications. The seller was able to locate a number of tank coils for this rig which will save me some time in this restoration. What I¡¯m still missing are the tuning units. I recently purchased a tuning unit for 20m but this is a tuning unit that is used in the doubling circuit and requires another tuning unit to double the crystal frequency on anything above 10 mhz.

I would like to use my ¡°parts¡± box to fabricate a plugin tuning unit for 80m. Hallicrafters provides the circuit for the tuning units in their manual but doesn¡¯t provide any component details. Hallicrafters only changes the part number for the TU assembly. The variable, the inductor and the fixed mica cap that is shown on the schematic for all the under 10mhz tuning units isn¡¯t addressed.

My focus right now would be for a 80m tuning unit to allow me to put this fine old transmitter on the air. Is there anyone out there that can give me a head start on values of the components that would be used for a 80m TU?

BTW, the Claremore hamfest was great (a great venue in their expo center with plenty of free parking and friendly people). The town provides easy access to motels and ?restaurants. There is also a great museum in town that is a must visit for anyone interested in firearms (and a lot of other items not firearm related). The JM Davis Museum displays the largest firearms collection in the world with over 14,000 firearms beautifully displayed and organized along with many other items such as beer steins, saddles, clocks etc. all this is organized by subject. A $5 admission allows you to spend several hours to view if you don¡¯t slow down to read the data on each item or the history behind it. You could easily spend a day looking in more detail.

Any help on the 80m tuning would be greatly appreciated.
Tom N5AMA