Re: Identify transformer
Flip the drawing and you could have a push pull amp driving another stage.
Walt Cates, WD0GOF
https://wd0gof.com/Hallicrafters
A majority of acceptance is not proof of
By
waltcates
·
#31300
·
Edited
|
Re: Identify transformer
Thanks Jim, I must be visually wonky. That is bad. I know I should write the numbers down and compare apples with apples, but¡ a real goof here.
Yes it must be a real step-down. 150 VA seems
By
don Root
·
#31299
·
Edited
|
Re: Identify transformer
DonWith a primary resistance of 85 ohms @ 12 Henrys and a secondary resistance of 0.6 ohms @ 0.055 Henrys how could this possibly be a step-up power transformer?? At 7 pounds, I would guess it would
By
Jim Whartenby
·
#31298
·
Edited
|
Re: Identify transformer
I am not really interested in further characteristics of the transformer or building anything with it. I would like to know what radio it was used in so I can make it available to someone who needs
By
waltcates
·
#31297
·
|
Re: Identify transformer
Yes Walt
I consider the turns ratio to be a primary characteristic of any
transformer, but voltage ratio is usually much the same.. assuming
I was guessing that you just measured it and have it
By
don Root
·
#31296
·
|
Re: Identify transformer
Don, did the photos come through on the original message. If they did, all the information I have is there.
Walt Cates, WD0GOF
https://wd0gof.com/Hallicrafters
A majority of acceptance is not
By
waltcates
·
#31295
·
|
Re: Identify transformer
Turns ratio?
from. Sergeant Friday
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of waltcates via groups.io
Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2024 5:08 PM
To: HALLI
By
don Root
·
#31294
·
|
Re: Non-Hallicrafters question (audio amp)
That's the oneSent from my Galaxy
By
Richard Knoppow
·
#31293
·
|
Identify transformer
Still cleaning out cabinets. I have a transformer and cannot remember what it goes to. It has a Hallicrafters part # 050-004270. It has another number that may be a manufacturer's in-house part # or
By
waltcates
·
#31292
·
Edited
|
Re: Non-Hallicrafters question (audio amp)
Citation 2--- That¡¯s a monster with a ton of iron! ..now that I see
By
don Root
·
#31291
·
|
Re: SX-16 with snap, crackle, pop ( Bill's beloved SX-17 on the ropes 03/06/21
In the drawing, B+ entered T5 thru the bottom of the primary and out top of the winding to supply B+ to the 6R7 plate and everything else.
A couple of you here suggested troubleshooting tries
By
Daniel K1DTS
·
#31290
·
Edited
|
Re: A Hallicrafters question (audio amp) !
There is any one with a Hallicrafters A-84 ?
This was my first Hi-Fi amplifier when I was 16, and always wished to listen to a pair.
Only 10W with a pair of class A biased, triode-connected KT66s
By
Jacques_VE2JFE
·
#31289
·
|
Re: Non-Hallicrafters question (audio amp)
Hi Richard,
A Citation II !
This is a special amplifier: video pentodes used as input + drivers, with multiple feedback loops.
I have one that waits to be ¡°restored¡±.
See attached.
73,
By
Jacques_VE2JFE
·
#31288
·
Edited
|
Re: Non-Hallicrafters question (audio amp)
Its been a while but I believe it was a Citation II. Also had several Dynakit 50 Watt amps. Had to get rid of them all.
I miss the theater speakers. They were c.1936 RCA Shearer horns from a
By
Richard Knoppow
·
#31287
·
|
Re: Non-Hallicrafters question (audio amp)
You are right and my memory is bad. It is the KT-66 that is the equivalent to the 5881. The 6550 is the KT88. Both tubes are intended for Ultra-Linear or McIntosh amps where the screens must have
By
Richard Knoppow
·
#31286
·
|
Re: Non-Hallicrafters question (audio amp)
Hi Richard,
Just curious: was your HK amp a Citation II model ?
Just a remark also: this is the second time I see the 5881 tube referred as the US equivalent of the KT88, or the reverse,
By
Jacques_VE2JFE
·
#31285
·
|
Re: Non-Hallicrafters question (audio amp)
MFJ part # is mfj-icp-120 or Mfj-icp-240.
Bob W4JFA
wrote:
By
Bob
·
#31284
·
|
Re: Non-Hallicrafters question (audio amp)
MFJ has a step start. They make one for 120 and 240 volts. The manuals with
schematics are on line.
Bob W4JFA
[email protected]> wrote:
By
Bob
·
#31283
·
|
Re: Non-Hallicrafters question (audio amp)
I don't know how quickly the B+ comes up in the amplifier. I had an HK amp for years (used on a pair of RCA theater speakers). The KT88/5881 is designed for the Ultra-Linear circuit where the
By
Richard Knoppow
·
#31282
·
|
Re: Non-Hallicrafters question (audio amp)
eBay item #?404481804963, under $10JimLogic: Method used to arrive at the wrong conclusion, with confidence.? Murphy
By
Jim Whartenby
·
#31281
·
|