开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Re: SR-500 Tornado


 

开云体育


For the 160-500 conversion, the correct power supply is the P-500 or the PS-500-AC. The PS-500A-AC does not have the bias adjustment. If you want to use later versions of the PS-500XXXXX then you will need?to install the bias divider network.


Walt Cates, WD0GOF
?
A majority of acceptance is not proof of correctness.



From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Robert Kembel <rwkembel@...>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2025 6:14 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] SR-500 Tornado
?
Hi All,

To wrap up part of this discussion, Walt Cates' repair guide for the SR-160/SR-500, section 9.11, lists the changes needed to convert the SR-160 to an SR-500. Other than some component changes, the main change would be to change the power supply from the PS-120-150 (a 150 watt transmitter supply) to the PS-120-400 power supply. This supply has a higher B+ for the finals (800v vs 550v) and higher current capabilities. This is the same supply as is used for the SR-400.

In the case of the SR-500 (or converted SR-160), either the 8236 tubes or the 6DQ5 tubes can be used. The 8236 tubes are much more rugged (but in short supply), but the 6DQ5 tubes will work fine although I am in agreement with using a cooling fan in either case.

The SR-150 is a bit of a different beast, and while it could be modified to use different finals and power supply, it is not as straightforward and would involve a PA socket change and rewiring. There was a bit of a "how much peak power" can I get out of a given pair of tubes that took place during the 70s's. The sweep tubes provide high peak current capabilities, but with limited average power dissipation (typically 35 watts). In my humble opinion, I think it would be best to leave the SR-150 as it is rather than make significant modifications to obtain a few more watts of output. Remember, it take a 4x increase in power to provide a one "S" unit difference. If you are wanting more power, maybe a better solution is to look at using an external linear amplifier.

Just my two cents (oops, no more pennies) worth,

Bob,? K7DYB

On 2/20/2025 4:42 PM, HF via groups.io wrote:
So...the SR-160 can be converted to resemble an SR-500 by changing the finals to 6DQ5s, adding a cooling fan, and a few other changes.?
1.? Could a similar QRO modification be inflicted upon an SR-150??
A pair of 6DQ5 finals in an SR-500 (original or ex-SR-160) with cooling fan would operate with 500 W PEP or 300W CW input? The pair of 6DQ5 finals in an HT-44 operate with 200W (either mode) input.?
2.? Could an HT-44 operate at SR-500 power levels if a cooling fan were added and it were connected to a P-500-AC or PS-500-DC power supply?
I bought an upgraded P-500 at SEAPAC last year and haven't found a use for it yet.
Cheers
Halden VE7UTS


Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.