开云体育Hi All,
To wrap up part of this discussion,
Walt Cates' repair guide for the SR-160/SR-500, section 9.11,
lists the changes needed to convert the SR-160 to an SR-500. Other
than some component changes, the main change would be to change
the power supply from the PS-120-150 (a 150 watt transmitter
supply) to the PS-120-400 power supply. This supply has a higher
B+ for the finals (800v vs 550v) and higher current capabilities.
This is the same supply as is used for the SR-400.
In the case of the SR-500 (or converted
SR-160), either the 8236 tubes or the 6DQ5 tubes can be used. The
8236 tubes are much more rugged (but in short supply), but the
6DQ5 tubes will work fine although I am in agreement with using a
cooling fan in either case.
The SR-150 is a bit of a different
beast, and while it could be modified to use different finals and
power supply, it is not as straightforward and would involve a PA
socket change and rewiring. There was a bit of a "how much peak
power" can I get out of a given pair of tubes that took place
during the 70s's. The sweep tubes provide high peak current
capabilities, but with limited average power dissipation
(typically 35 watts). In my humble opinion, I think it would be
best to leave the SR-150 as it is rather than make significant
modifications to obtain a few more watts of output. Remember, it
take a 4x increase in power to provide a one "S" unit difference.
If you are wanting more power, maybe a better solution is to look
at using an external linear amplifier.
Just my two cents (oops, no more
pennies) worth,
Bob,? K7DYB
On 2/20/2025 4:42 PM, HF via groups.io
wrote:
|