Halden, now that everybody has been silent, ??? ???¡°would an SSR that turns on at zero voltage and turns off at zero current ????????????put the core back to zero every time and prevent current surges at turn-on¡±
I looked around and can¡¯t find just how much magnetism is normally left in good transformer steel.
Sketches in tutorials are not to scale and deceiving IMO. ?I recall real hysteresis curves from years ago, and ?there was a only a small amount of magnetization left.? Restoring it to zero is a tall order. ??The idea of removing magnetism is best displayed in tape head demagnetizers and such where the AC magnetizing force is gradually reduced.
From:[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Whartenby via groups.io Sent: Friday, July 5, 2024 2:54 AM To:[email protected] Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY
?
Halden?
I can't answer your question.? I don't know all of the pitfalls of using an SSR in place of a mechanical switch.? I don't know if there are any unintended consequences.? The SSR will turn ON and OFF at approximately the same part of the AC cycle every time so there may be an accumulative effect.? The random nature of a mechanical switch that has contact bounce would be very hard to repeat exactly and would be spread over a greater portion of the AC cycle.? ?
Regards,
Jim
?
Logic: Method used to arrive at the wrong conclusion, with confidence.? Murphy
?
?
On Thursday, July 4, 2024 at 03:48:33 PM CDT, HF via groups.io <incorridge@...> wrote:
?
?
Hi Jim, Thanks!? So, would an SSR that turns on at zero voltage and turns off at zero current put the core back to zero every time and prevent current surges at turn-on? Halden