开云体育

Hi Lothar: My instrument came from HP with OPT6 so I have this hardware, but this is good information nonetheless. FYI - I checked all the Vcc RAILS around the EEPROM they are not low, nor is their

one note on option 006 ,? altough you can turn 006 on in the EEPROM you will need to change the source and run the source and sampler related adjustment tests ! unlike the older 8753A/B/C the D and

One more quick thing - be sure the 10 MHz reference is OK, whether it's the internal OCXO, or an external source. I've had many failures of the internal reference (all oven failures) on the 8566 over

In my quest to put a 8516A to use i hit another snag ,? the manual states that the 8341 needs to have Serial# 2812A or higher and FW 11 May 88 ,? i have a old CPU board that has 1992 FW so no

As long as the supplies are working, and reasonably close to spec, the 8566 should at least be operational. The first thing is to get to that state, then you can later set the supplies as accurately

Agreed 100% about VHDL! -Dave

A bit later than Palasm was AHDL from Altera, since bought by Intel.? Kind of nice, as one could generate fairly complex designs quickly and without the overhead BS of VHDL.? VHDL was designed by

Hello HP/Agilent/Keysight people! I am? new here, this group was recommended to me by someone on the EEVblog forum, that's where I came from. I have had this HP 1727A scope for a while now and have

Hi and thanks for the info. Those tolerances are way tighter than I'd ever imagined! No way can I meet those kind of standards with the meters I have currently. I also very much doubt I have the

Lou, I have the 8568B manual set from Artek.? It is definitely better!? I can easily read the signal names and pin numbers on that exact area of the schematic. --John Gord

Thanks All, Indeed the quality is excellent and the price is very fair. Example of the same section that I posted before. [image: image.png] Regards Lou VK3ALB wrote:

It's trivial to edit the source code and comment out that prompt. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

My 8568A manual definitely is much better than your 8568B sample. Raymond

In my experience, Dave's (ArtekManuals') scans are as good as they get. He is dependent on the quality of his original though, which cannot always be a good quality printed version. If you email him

That didn't last long, fortunately. I use PALASM today, for when I need PALs/GALs. It's great...simple, fast, no fluff, no BS, predictable. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

I remember designing with PALs, GALs, and CPLDs back in the 80's.? Great for reducing the number of SSI TTL chips on a board, but they were power-hogs, if I recall correctly. I did the programming

I print schematics on a D sized plotter. The schematics from Artek manuals are always excellent quality and print clearly without dropouts or fuzzed lines, even when enlarged. Well worth the very

Thanks George, That's what I was hoping to hear. -- Regards Lou VK3ALB

All of the manuals I’ve purchased from Artek are much better than your example. George

True, a shift register may be all you can get.? Making a counter can be more difficult because you may not have access to the preset lines on the flipflops. I skipped from the 22V10 directly to