Agreed 100% about VHDL!
-Dave
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2/22/22 20:54, Jim Ford wrote:
A bit later than Palasm was AHDL from Altera, since bought by Intel. Kind of nice, as one could generate fairly complex designs quickly and without the overhead BS of VHDL.? VHDL was designed by committee, and it shows.
Jim Ford
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
-------- Original message --------
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire@...>
Date: 2/22/22 2:02 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PAL misconceptions, was Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] 8516A cable question
On 2/22/22 16:32, Jeff Anderson wrote:
> I remember designing with PALs, GALs, and CPLDs back in the 80's.? Great
> for reducing the number of SSI TTL chips on a board, but they were
> power-hogs, if I recall correctly.
?? That didn't last long, fortunately.
> I did the programming for various designs with ABEL, PALASM, and CUPL.
> Don't recall their syntax any longer, though.
?? I use PALASM today, for when I need PALs/GALs.? It's great...simple,
fast, no fluff, no BS, predictable.
????????? -Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Dave McGuire