Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: Crystal Filter Input and Output Impedance Measurements
Hi John,
I spent quite a while adjusting the resistors on my initial filter and it always seemed a little wobbly on the top, I did get a reasonable result eventually but I think my crystals were probably not the best. For testing purposes I bought a whole load of cheap ones so it would not matter if I made any mistakes as they were only a few pence each. You were right in that the resistance should have been around 200 ohms, I got about 260 ohms at one point and the other end was a bit higher. I always like to try these things initially using cheap components so I do not need to worry about messing them up, once I know I am working along the right lines and I am getting roughly the results I expect I get better parts. After doing this for a while I got distracted by Larry's videos (see previous post) and spent a while learning the very basics of SimSmith and working out a good LC matching network - this appears to have given me a reasonable looking filter which should be good for my 40m receiver I am designing. My design is based on the one Charlie Morris is currently working on, I have just modified it to 40m: Thanks again for the help and suggestions, Kerr |
Re: OOPS!! Re-factory alignment....
Gordon Gibby
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýaha!!! ?yes, thank you, extremely helpful.
The factory alignment does essentially the same steps just slightly different ways.
Thank you for pointing that out, I hadn't seen it.
The way I selected the BFO frequency apparently is just a tad "bassy" for the preferences of the ALE algorithm. ?shifting it (from my pick)?to give another couple hundred hertz on the treble side would make the uBitx almost perfect
for a ALE scanning.
One of the ALE expert's (looking at the schematic) pointed out my error: ?upon closer examination, the transmit relays are NOT clicking at all when one merely scans receiving frequencies; ?I was hearing small pops in the speaker
and thinking those were relays clicking.
The uBitX ?is able to scan at full speed, (selection: five frequencies per second), continuously, without the need for any relay ?actuation. ? Makes it almost a perfect receiver for ALE or similar scanning.
Sent from my iPhone
|
Re: Laser cut ubitx case SVG
No. Its just plywood.
-Max. On 31 December 2017 04:30:44 GMT+00:00, "Paul Schumacher via Groups.Io" <[email protected]> wrote:
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
I'd hope your capacitors had numbers and letters printed on them! Please tell us those. .22pF is mighty small - is that decimal point a fly-spot? That would give you 2x22=44pF, 1.10 the required value. I'd suggest a trip to your nearest vendor or dive into your junkbox or online with a few days' wait for the proper value. There's nothing critical to the value in this position +/- 10%, and no temperature sensitivity - NPO, PTC, NTC, disc ceramic or mica, if it'll fit on the board (or with reasonably short leads) it'll do the job. I've had resistors lift like that and replaced with the smallest axials I could find, standing up? with about 2mm of bend to the leads for the pads. Works fine. Good luck!
73 Dex, ZL2DEX |
Re: Tuner? Well Sure!
Rod Self
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýWilliam,Count me in. I would be inclined to implement it it a separate case to be used with other rigs,also. What are your (er) current thoughts on separate Nano vs integrate into ubitx's Nano? Hope it has its own Nano, and does not rely on the ubitx. No problem if not, I can simply supply a Nano and make the tuner believe it is 'talking' to the ubitx. Maybe I will come up with a stand-alone-controller-project for your tuner, so it can be driven with two wires, start and done. I am interested in supporting this project. Regards, Rod KM6SN On 12/29/2017 07:05 AM, K9HZ wrote:
|
Re: Power output decreases as a function of frequency?
#bitx40
OK John,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
disconnect C6 and C7 - desolder and use the common point of C11 and C41 disconnect C1 and L1 . L1 you need desolder only the start end. Use the common point going to relay and C142. connect the two points listed above. You are done. Now check and see. I had the similar result in an earlier board. Here is what one looked, no issue with this board. Raj At 31-12-2017, you wrote: Raj, |
Gordon Gibby
¿ªÔÆÌåÓý?wow, you got a great deal!!!? Be sure to specify the capacitance in your order!!!? ?You should have enough to go into business for yourself selling those chips!!!
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN <kb3mun@...>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2017 12:17 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 ?
On 12/31/2017 00:12, Gordon Gibby wrote:
I went with . Thanks for the links. 73 de Daniel KB3MUN |
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýOn 12/31/2017 00:12, Gordon Gibby
wrote:
I went with . Thanks for the links. 73 de Daniel KB3MUN |
Gordon Gibby
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýAnother source:
?
CD15FD471JO3 - 470 pF??5%??500WVDC - $2.75 each
I used some like these to do a cheapie way of getting my Bitx40 onto 80 meters....along with an 80 meter LPF on the output of the transmitter.......
worked well.
gordon
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2017 12:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 ?
surface mount (but not sure of the size):? ? Digikey:? ??
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2017 12:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 ?
Amazon:? ?
DigiKey:???
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN <kb3mun@...>
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 11:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 ?
Thanks for the info.
My typo, I used a pair of .22 pF for .44pF (closes I could get).? Your right is doesn't work too well, although I could hear a a QSO around 7.3 MHz. Thanks again, Daniel KB3MUN On 12/30/2017 23:26, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io wrote: 470pf? in an NPO or C0G or silver mica would be ideal. |
Gordon Gibby
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2017 12:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 ?
Amazon:? ?
DigiKey:???
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN <kb3mun@...>
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 11:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 ?
Thanks for the info.
My typo, I used a pair of .22 pF for .44pF (closes I could get).? Your right is doesn't work too well, although I could hear a a QSO around 7.3 MHz. Thanks again, Daniel KB3MUN On 12/30/2017 23:26, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io wrote: 470pf? in an NPO or C0G or silver mica would be ideal. |
Gahhh,? ?3 orders of magnitude.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 09:12 pm, Jerry Gaffke wrote: Still two orders of magnitude off. |
Gordon Gibby
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN <kb3mun@...>
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 11:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 ?
Thanks for the info.
My typo, I used a pair of .22 pF for .44pF (closes I could get).? Your right is doesn't work too well, although I could hear a a QSO around 7.3 MHz. Thanks again, Daniel KB3MUN On 12/30/2017 23:26, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io wrote: 470pf? in an NPO or C0G or silver mica would be ideal. |
Still two orders of magnitude off.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I assume you used two 0.22nF caps.? (nano-Farads isn't used quite so much as pico-Farads and micro-Farads in amateur circles) 220pF = 0.220nF = 0.000220uF = 0.000000000220 Farads. On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 08:56 pm, D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN wrote:
My typo, I used a pair of .22 pF for .44pF (closes I could get).? |
Re: what else should I order from there?
#parts
I use their I2C LCD backpack boards and their SI5351 board (which can be fed either 5V or 3.3V).? They have kits of machined header pins and sockets, and rotary encoders, as well.?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
And the little red boxes are perfect for storing parts and/or project sub-assemblies. ;) On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 07:30 am, Doug W wrote:
|
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThanks for the info.
My typo, I used a pair of .22 pF for .44pF (closes I could get).? Your right is doesn't work too well, although I could hear a a QSO around 7.3 MHz. Thanks again, Daniel KB3MUN On 12/30/2017 23:26, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io wrote: 470pf? in an NPO or C0G or silver mica would be ideal. |
Re: Laser cut ubitx case SVG
Is that Lucite?? and how thick?? 1/8 inch? thanks, Paul K0ZYV From: Max Lock <max@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 3:33 PM Subject: [BITX20] Laser cut ubitx case SVG Hi All, If any of you have access to a laser cutter, or are really handy with a fret saw, you may find this useful. -Cheers Max, G7UOZ. |
470pf? in an NPO or C0G or silver mica would be ideal.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Voltages there are quite low, less than 5v, so most any voltage rating. > I've temporarily repaired with a pair of .22uF in parallel. That would give you 0.44uF, which is 440000pF.? Not good, I'd be surprised if it worked at all. On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 08:07 pm, D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN wrote: I need part specification for BITX40 capacitor C7. I know it is a 470 pF. Is it an NPO? what voltage rating? |
¿ªÔÆÌåÓý2 x 0.22uF in
parallel gives 0.44uF. Much, much, much? bigger value than
470pF. On 31/12/2017 3:07 PM, D. Daniel
McGlothin KB3MUN wrote:
I need part specification for BITX40 capacitor C7. I know it is a 470 pF. Is it an NPO? what voltage rating? This week past, I put together my BITX40. Observing very weak audio signal, I was following the receiver diagnostics video ( ) and found unexpected behavior when probing the band pass filter. I also found that I have a bad audio jack linking the headphone jack and the speaker (probably a overheating problem). Anyway, I was re-soldering the BPF inductors (L1..L3). While there, I decided to resolder the capacitors (C1..C7) as well. C7 came off when soldering one end (the other end "broke" off, and the chip came off on the iron). I've temporarily repaired with a pair of .22uF in parallel. Thanks, Daniel KB3MUN |