¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Crystal Filter Input and Output Impedance Measurements

 

Hi John,

I spent quite a while adjusting the resistors on my initial filter and it always seemed a little wobbly on the top, I did get a reasonable result eventually but I think my crystals were probably not the best. For testing purposes I bought a whole load of cheap ones so it would not matter if I made any mistakes as they were only a few pence each. You were right in that the resistance should have been around 200 ohms, I got about 260 ohms at one point and the other end was a bit higher.

I always like to try these things initially using cheap components so I do not need to worry about messing them up, once I know I am working along the right lines and I am getting roughly the results I expect I get better parts.

After doing this for a while I got distracted by Larry's videos (see previous post) and spent a while learning the very basics of SimSmith and working out a good LC matching network - this appears to have given me a reasonable looking filter which should be good for my 40m receiver I am designing.

My design is based on the one Charlie Morris is currently working on, I have just modified it to 40m:



Thanks again for the help and suggestions,

Kerr


Re: OOPS!! Re-factory alignment....

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

aha!!! ?yes, thank you, extremely helpful.

The factory alignment does essentially the same steps just slightly different ways.


Thank you for pointing that out, I hadn't seen it.

The way I selected the BFO frequency apparently is just a tad "bassy" for the preferences of the ALE algorithm. ?shifting it (from my pick)?to give another couple hundred hertz on the treble side would make the uBitx almost perfect for a ALE scanning.

One of the ALE expert's (looking at the schematic) pointed out my error: ?upon closer examination, the transmit relays are NOT clicking at all when one merely scans receiving frequencies; ?I was hearing small pops in the speaker and thinking those were relays clicking.

The uBitX ?is able to scan at full speed, (selection: five frequencies per second), continuously, without the need for any relay ?actuation. ? Makes it almost a perfect receiver for ALE or similar scanning.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 31, 2017, at 04:26, AndyH <ahecker@...> wrote:

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:01 pm, Gordon Gibby wrote:

?

?(A "manual" for factory alignment would be wonderful....)? ?

Useful???


Re: OOPS!! Re-factory alignment....

 

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:01 pm, Gordon Gibby wrote:

?

?(A "manual" for factory alignment would be wonderful....)? ?

Useful???


Re: Laser cut ubitx case SVG

 

No. Its just plywood.

-Max.

On 31 December 2017 04:30:44 GMT+00:00, "Paul Schumacher via Groups.Io" <[email protected]> wrote:
Is that Lucite?? and how thick?? 1/8 inch?

thanks,

Paul K0ZYV



From: Max Lock <max@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 3:33 PM
Subject: [BITX20] Laser cut ubitx case SVG

Hi All,

If any of you have access to a laser cutter, or are really handy with a
fret saw, you may find this useful.



-Cheers Max, G7UOZ.







--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


Re: #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 #bitx40 #parts

 

I'd hope your capacitors had numbers and letters printed on them! Please tell us those. .22pF is mighty small - is that decimal point a fly-spot? That would give you 2x22=44pF, 1.10 the required value. I'd suggest a trip to your nearest vendor or dive into your junkbox or online with a few days' wait for the proper value. There's nothing critical to the value in this position +/- 10%, and no temperature sensitivity - NPO, PTC, NTC, disc ceramic or mica, if it'll fit on the board (or with reasonably short leads) it'll do the job. I've had resistors lift like that and replaced with the smallest axials I could find, standing up? with about 2mm of bend to the leads for the pads. Works fine. Good luck!
73
Dex, ZL2DEX


Re: Tuner? Well Sure!

Rod Self
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

William,

Count me in.

I would be inclined to implement it it a separate case to be used with other rigs,also.

What are your (er) current thoughts on separate Nano vs integrate into ubitx's Nano?

Hope it has its own Nano, and does not rely on the ubitx. No problem if not, I can simply supply a Nano and make the tuner believe it is 'talking' to the ubitx.

Maybe I will come up with a stand-alone-controller-project for your tuner, so it can be driven with two wires, start and done.

I am interested in supporting this project.

Regards,

Rod KM6SN





On 12/29/2017 07:05 AM, K9HZ wrote:

So after finishing up most of my projects a few days ago¡­ I really needed something to do¡­ so I put on the drawing board¡­ a 100w automatic tuner that can work with the uBITx (intended to go inside the same case actually) that provides power, SWR, band memory for same antennas, low power tune, bypass, etc. all in a kit form for about $30.? I¡¯m prototyping the think now and will work on the tuning/communications code (to integrate into the Raduino) shortly.? I¡¯ve contacted a few of you off-channel to work out some protocol/communication issues¡­? but Stay tuned (double play on words there)! ???

?

?

Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ

?

Owner - Operator

Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC

Staunton, Illinois

?

Owner ¨C Operator

Villa Grand Piton ¨C J68HZ

Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I.

Rent it:

Like us on Facebook!

?

?

email:? bill@...

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gordon Gibby
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 8:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] ALE, WINLINK and uBitX

?

Good pickups!

?

So the ALE (automatic link establishment) crowd, much like the WINLINK crowd, tend to use LOTS of bands....and thus they find ways to make their antenna systems work on mulltiple bands.? ?Here are some of the most popular ways:

?

1.? ?Fan Dipoles (time honored technique of tying multiple dipoles together at the CENTER, and the energy tends to go to the correct one, since all the others present much higher impedances.? ?The wires "fan" out with usually wooden spreaders at the? end and some string involved to keep them somewhat separate.? ?Been there done that many times, my college ham club has a 3-band unit up on the top of an 11 story building rightnow that I built for them.? ?Build for yourself, dirt cheap.?

?

2.? Auto-tuners? --- everyone makes these now and many can tune as soon as they see RF, or even return to previous settings that were memorized.? ?LDG,? and others.? ?Low power versions for $100? ?End fed wire to balanced line fed dipoles---they work with lots of different kinds of wire.?

?

3.? Inherently multiband antennas:? ?example, full wavelength loops.? ?Build for yourself.? ?

?

4.? Carefully tuned end-fed transformer-fed antennas --- there are now several of these on the market and they give an acceptable SWR on mulltiple harmonically related bands.? ?Tend to be close to $100

?

5.? (the one I dislike)? resistively terminated folded dipoles --- these use a resistor to make up for what a folded dipole can't create and give an SWR that is "acceptable" literally across EVERY FREQUENCY in a decade of frequencies.? ?3-30 MHz.? ?The tradeoff is loss, as much as 10 db at times.? And they generally are pricey.

?

6.? There are some multi-band vertical antennas on the market that are basically vertical fan dipoles, but scrunched up in a nice package.? ?An elderly ham in my city has one, 32 feet tall....a gang of us put it up and doggone it does from from 40 meters all the way through 6 meters

?

?

And there are probably many more....

?

Gordon


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Arvo KD9HLC via Groups.Io <arvopl@...>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 9:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] ALE, WINLINK and uBitX

?

An automatic tuner protects the rig during TX.? If the SWR is bad during TX, some of the signal coming out of the transmitter is reflected by the antenna back into the radio where it can cause damage.

That said, RX is optimized by a properly tuned antenna, but some good amount of signal still makes into the radio when receiving, even when the antenna is not perfect.

So I assume Doc G? is scanning for radio traffic, and then when he finds some if he wants to transmit he does something about his SWR for that frequency.



Re: Power output decreases as a function of frequency? #bitx40

 

OK John,

disconnect C6 and C7 - desolder and use the common point of C11 and C41

disconnect C1 and L1 . L1 you need desolder only the start end. Use the common point going to relay and C142.

connect the two points listed above. You are done. Now check and see.

I had the similar result in an earlier board. Here is what one looked, no issue with this board.

Emacs!

Raj

At 31-12-2017, you wrote:

Raj,

Could you suggest a method for bypassing L1-L3? I'm not sure how I would do that with any temporary change, any approach I can think of would be permanent and then attempting to reverse the damage later.

And where is the output filter on the board?

Something is definitely off center, I set the Raduino to transmit out of band and the power tails off in a rather symmetrical pattern centered on 7000khz, with another attachment showing the output power vs frequency.

Thanks!

John


On 12/29/2017 11:20 PM, Raj vu2zap wrote:
Could be something with L1-3. Temporarily bypass the filter and try another test.
I have one board with the filter centered a bit and gives less power higher up the band
but we work only till 7.2MHz.

It could be the output filter also.

Raj




Re: Tuner? Well Sure!

 

Hi Bill
Count me in also. Thanks.
Andy KM4TRT


Re: #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 #bitx40 #parts

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

?wow, you got a great deal!!!? Be sure to specify the capacitance in your order!!!? ?You should have enough to go into business for yourself selling those chips!!!



From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN <kb3mun@...>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2017 12:17 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7
?
On 12/31/2017 00:12, Gordon Gibby wrote:

Amazon:? ?


DigiKey:???



I went with .
Thanks for the links.

73 de Daniel KB3MUN


Re: #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 #bitx40 #parts

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

On 12/31/2017 00:12, Gordon Gibby wrote:

Amazon:? ?


DigiKey:???



I went with .
Thanks for the links.

73 de Daniel KB3MUN


Re: #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 #bitx40 #parts

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Another source:


?


CD15FD471JO3 - 470 pF??5%??500WVDC - $2.75 each



I used some like these to do a cheapie way of getting my Bitx40 onto 80 meters....along with an 80 meter LPF on the output of the transmitter.......


worked well.


gordon




From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2017 12:14 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7
?

surface mount (but not sure of the size):? ?

Digikey:? ??



From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2017 12:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7
?

Amazon:? ?


DigiKey:???




From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN <kb3mun@...>
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 11:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7
?
Thanks for the info.

My typo, I used a pair of .22 pF for .44pF (closes I could get).? Your right is doesn't work too well, although I could hear a a QSO around 7.3 MHz.

Thanks again,
Daniel KB3MUN

On 12/30/2017 23:26, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io wrote:
470pf? in an NPO or C0G or silver mica would be ideal.
Voltages there are quite low, less than 5v, so most any voltage rating.

> I've temporarily repaired with a pair of .22uF in parallel.

That would give you 0.44uF, which is 440000pF.?
Not good, I'd be surprised if it worked at all.



On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 08:07 pm, D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN wrote:
I need part specification for BITX40 capacitor C7. I know it is a 470 pF. Is it an NPO? what voltage rating?


Re: #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 #bitx40 #parts

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

surface mount (but not sure of the size):? ?

Digikey:? ??



From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2017 12:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7
?

Amazon:? ?


DigiKey:???




From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN <kb3mun@...>
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 11:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7
?
Thanks for the info.

My typo, I used a pair of .22 pF for .44pF (closes I could get).? Your right is doesn't work too well, although I could hear a a QSO around 7.3 MHz.

Thanks again,
Daniel KB3MUN

On 12/30/2017 23:26, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io wrote:
470pf? in an NPO or C0G or silver mica would be ideal.
Voltages there are quite low, less than 5v, so most any voltage rating.

> I've temporarily repaired with a pair of .22uF in parallel.

That would give you 0.44uF, which is 440000pF.?
Not good, I'd be surprised if it worked at all.



On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 08:07 pm, D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN wrote:
I need part specification for BITX40 capacitor C7. I know it is a 470 pF. Is it an NPO? what voltage rating?


Re: #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 #bitx40 #parts

 

Gahhh,? ?3 orders of magnitude.


On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 09:12 pm, Jerry Gaffke wrote:
Still two orders of magnitude off.


Re: #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 #bitx40 #parts

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Amazon:? ?


DigiKey:???




From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN <kb3mun@...>
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 11:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7
?
Thanks for the info.

My typo, I used a pair of .22 pF for .44pF (closes I could get).? Your right is doesn't work too well, although I could hear a a QSO around 7.3 MHz.

Thanks again,
Daniel KB3MUN

On 12/30/2017 23:26, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io wrote:
470pf? in an NPO or C0G or silver mica would be ideal.
Voltages there are quite low, less than 5v, so most any voltage rating.

> I've temporarily repaired with a pair of .22uF in parallel.

That would give you 0.44uF, which is 440000pF.?
Not good, I'd be surprised if it worked at all.



On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 08:07 pm, D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN wrote:
I need part specification for BITX40 capacitor C7. I know it is a 470 pF. Is it an NPO? what voltage rating?


Re: #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 #bitx40 #parts

 

Still two orders of magnitude off.
I assume you used two 0.22nF caps.? (nano-Farads isn't used quite so much as pico-Farads and micro-Farads in amateur circles)
220pF = 0.220nF = 0.000220uF = 0.000000000220 Farads.


On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 08:56 pm, D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN wrote:
My typo, I used a pair of .22 pF for .44pF (closes I could get).?


Re: what else should I order from there? #parts

 

I use their I2C LCD backpack boards and their SI5351 board (which can be fed either 5V or 3.3V).? They have kits of machined header pins and sockets, and rotary encoders, as well.?

And the little red boxes are perfect for storing parts and/or project sub-assemblies. ;)


On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 07:30 am, Doug W wrote:
I have a suggestion when someone suggests a vendor.? The idea came to me when Vince found a 1/4" shaft audio pot (great find by the way).

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 03:39 pm, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
Just heard back from Adafruit. This pot: for $1.50 is an audio taper and has a 6mm shaft (1/4" is 6.35mm).

I've never ordered from adafruit because for the longest time they wouldn't ship usps to me so the shipping was a killer.? I see they finally will ship usps.?? What else should I buy from them?? I'm not talking about the standards I can find anywhere but it seems like each vendor has a few things that are very difficult to source anywhere else.? An example would be the M7 nuts for the chinese encoders that Jameco seems to have the market cornered on.? Like most of us I have paid more in shipping than the part costs just to get something I need only to remember a day later I should have ordered something else or spent more time filling my cart on Tayda to hit $5 than it took to find what I was looking for in the first place.? So my suggestion is this, if you are naming a vendor try to also list a few things that are great cart fillers or hard to find anywhere else.? I realize with everyone chasing different projects this isn't always practical or useful, but it might be.


Re: #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 #bitx40 #parts

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks for the info.

My typo, I used a pair of .22 pF for .44pF (closes I could get).? Your right is doesn't work too well, although I could hear a a QSO around 7.3 MHz.

Thanks again,
Daniel KB3MUN

On 12/30/2017 23:26, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io wrote:

470pf? in an NPO or C0G or silver mica would be ideal.
Voltages there are quite low, less than 5v, so most any voltage rating.

> I've temporarily repaired with a pair of .22uF in parallel.

That would give you 0.44uF, which is 440000pF.?
Not good, I'd be surprised if it worked at all.



On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 08:07 pm, D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN wrote:
I need part specification for BITX40 capacitor C7. I know it is a 470 pF. Is it an NPO? what voltage rating?


Re: Laser cut ubitx case SVG

 

Is that Lucite?? and how thick?? 1/8 inch?

thanks,

Paul K0ZYV



From: Max Lock <max@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 3:33 PM
Subject: [BITX20] Laser cut ubitx case SVG

Hi All,

If any of you have access to a laser cutter, or are really handy with a
fret saw, you may find this useful.



-Cheers Max, G7UOZ.







Re: #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 #bitx40 #parts

 

470pf? in an NPO or C0G or silver mica would be ideal.
Voltages there are quite low, less than 5v, so most any voltage rating.

> I've temporarily repaired with a pair of .22uF in parallel.

That would give you 0.44uF, which is 440000pF.?
Not good, I'd be surprised if it worked at all.



On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 08:07 pm, D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN wrote:
I need part specification for BITX40 capacitor C7. I know it is a 470 pF. Is it an NPO? what voltage rating?


Re: #bitx40 #parts need spec's on BITX40 capacitor C7 #bitx40 #parts

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

2 x 0.22uF in parallel gives 0.44uF. Much, much, much? bigger value than 470pF.


On 31/12/2017 3:07 PM, D. Daniel McGlothin KB3MUN wrote:

I need part specification for BITX40 capacitor C7.  I know it is a 470 pF.  Is it an NPO?  what voltage rating?

This week past, I put together my BITX40.  Observing very weak audio signal, I was following the receiver diagnostics video (  ) and found unexpected behavior when probing the band pass filter.  I also found that I have a bad audio jack linking the headphone jack and the speaker (probably a overheating problem).

Anyway, I was re-soldering the BPF inductors (L1..L3).  While there, I decided to resolder the capacitors (C1..C7) as well.  C7 came off when soldering one end (the other end "broke" off, and the chip came off on the iron).

I've temporarily repaired with a pair of .22uF in parallel.

Thanks,
Daniel KB3MUN