¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: uBITX - U1 Getting Fried - possible cause #ubitx

Daniel Conklin
 

I saw the picture of that adapter somewhere, but now I can't find it. Could you link to it please? Thanks.
Dan, W2DLC


Re: njm2073

 

A socket should be fine.
I doubt you will be replacing the chip much now that you have moved away from the DX.


On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:11 pm, @bobbybailey wrote:
today I ordered the 5 volt reg. and some of the 2073 chips,
what I am wondering is there any one know if there is any problems with installing a socket for the audio chip.
I don't want to create any more problems with this rig.


Re: The issues of the TDA2822

Vince Vielhaber
 

According to Tayda, the 2822M is an SGS-Thomson part, while the 2822L is made by UTC. I should also note that the 2822M is also out of stock but they have over 120k 2922Ls.

Vince.

On 03/07/2018 12:44 AM, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io wrote:
I disagree.
Both are spec'd for operating voltages of 1.8 to 15v.
Look like TDA2822 clones to me, in spite of the different part numbers.

And like all the TDA2822 datasheets, they spec distortion by way of
giving specific supply voltages and speaker impedances and power levels
for some max distortion level.
And none of them including the TDA2822 bother to do so for a 12v supply.
I guess that's what John is complaining about.

I believe ST (was SGS-Thomson) was the originator of the TDA2822.
They still make the TDA2822D, which is the SOIC version.
Mouser sells it.
Max dissipation is only 1/2 watt though, as one might expect, a problem
for us.
They probably gave up on the DIP after the first dozen clones showed up.
And all the manufacturers of miniature audio gear wanted to give up on
DIP's as well.

It ain't dead yet.

Jerry, KE7ER


On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 09:22 pm, John Backo wrote:

Neither of Jerry's recommendations are pin for pin replacements.
Both of them are recommended for relatively low voltage
applications, even though the maximum voltage is given as
15v or so.

--
Michigan VHF Corp.


Re: Raduino, powered by a Teensy 3.2. #ubitx #bitx40

Jack Purdum
 

Gerry:

Contact me off line at my QRZ.com email.

Jack, W8TEE



From: gerrykav via Groups.Io <gerrykav@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Raduino, powered by a Teensy 3.2. #ubitx #bitx40

I have done some prototyping of this... with some degrees of success. Ideally it needs an AGC before the Teensy though.
?


You can hear some (poor quality) audio here:??

/ Gerry



Re: Raduino, powered by a Teensy 3.2. #ubitx #bitx40

 

I have done some prototyping of this... with some degrees of success. Ideally it needs an AGC before the Teensy though.

?



You can hear some (poor quality) audio here:??

/ Gerry


My uBITX shipped today

IK6CRE - Stefano
 

I order it?on January 5, 2018 through Paypal that today write me about delivery time: about 3/4 weeks via Indiapost.



Re: USB for digital ops wierd noise and low output power

Francisco Neira - OA4CKN
 

I am a newcomer and upgraded the sketch to have USB access on my bitx40. Also removed C91 and C92 but as soon as I switch to USB comes a howling noise from the speaker. That strange sound dissapears whe returning to LSB. Did you find the answer to your problem?

73 de OA4CKN, grid FH17LW


Re: TDA2822 Replacement

 

Dex,

Yes it was a funny misuse of the word and it was a type-o late at night..... what is not funny is having some kiwi like you come at me and just short of call me stupid and "should go back to middle school". Maybe you should go crawl back under the rock you look like you came from....I am here to enjoy a hobby and share tips, tricks and other info with like minded Hams. I don't come here to be insulted by the likes of you or anyone for a simple type-o.

In the nicest way Dex ....Piss off!


--
David

?N8DAH


Re: The issues of the TDA2822

 

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 09:44 pm, Jerry Gaffke wrote:
And all the manufacturers of miniature audio gear wanted to give up on DIP's as well.
DIP and 12V rails, too.? Seems like everything's either got 2 AA batteries or is charged by a USB connection.

Great discussion on all this!


Re: The issues of the TDA2822

 

What I have been asking Santa aka Farhan is for a similar circuit that just plugs in to the existing 8 pins.
No need for output caps and such as it is already there!

Raj

At 07-03-18, you wrote:
Ash and all,

Jerry Gaffke provided a valuable link:



the second circuit (without crossover distortion compensation) seems to me to be more than adequate, with extremely low? THD.

Uses fairly common parts, and not very complex.


Rod KM6SN




On 03/07/2018 01:01 AM, Ashhar Farhan wrote:
John, others,

Given our experience of the non-generic ICs going out of production, it is best to stick to either discrete or generic ICs. The bitx20 will soon be a 15 year old design. The NorCal is probably older and still being built. We will have to choose parts that are going to be around for a long time, that are easily substituted. This means, we must work with large design margins, discrete or generic ICs.

Given these limitations, we are pretty much limited to either op-amps or discrete devices.

Opinions?


- f


Re: TDA2822 experiments and mods

 

Solution 3: 78L09. the center lead looks soldered but it is floating but the tab is soldered to the copper
below it. The white wire is my fix for prevent the filter relays from clicking during PTT. Yes the board
needs a brush cleaning!

The audio is fine but distorts at high volume. The 9V voltage out does not drop at max volume.

Emacs!



At 06-03-18, you wrote:

I did some experiments with the chip failure.

FCI chips were sourced locally and plugged in. No failure with normal volume.
I raised the volume to a high level and the chip failed immediately!

Solutions

1: Add a resistor in series with the 12V line maybe 10-15 ohms to drop the voltage.

2. Simple solution is to use only a 16 Ohm speaker or add a series 8-10 Ohm resistor with the 8 ohm speakers.

3. Cut the power track to the TDA and insert a 78L08 or 9 to reduce the voltage. There is a track which can be cut
??? and a SMD or leaded regulator can be soldered on the board. This track leads directly to the chip and filter cap.

The second solution may be the simplest.

Further experimentation scheduled for tomorrow!


Re: The issues of the TDA2822

Rod Self
 

Ash and all,

Jerry Gaffke provided a valuable link:



the second circuit (without crossover distortion compensation) seems to me to be more than adequate, with extremely low? THD.

Uses fairly common parts, and not very complex.


Rod KM6SN

On 03/07/2018 01:01 AM, Ashhar Farhan wrote:
John, others,

Given our experience of the non-generic ICs going out of production, it is best to stick to either discrete or generic ICs. The bitx20 will soon be a 15 year old design. The NorCal is probably older and still being built. We will have to choose parts that are going to be around for a long time, that are easily substituted. This means, we must work with large design margins, discrete or generic ICs.

Given these limitations, we are pretty much limited to either op-amps or discrete devices.

Opinions?


- f


Re: TDA2822 Replacement

w7hd.rh
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I think there was some misspelling there.?? Try Occultation or Osculation.

Ron W7HD


On 03/06/2018 11:38 PM, Dexter N Muir wrote:

Raj: I applaud Mr. Hobday's work, and his methods: modern teaching by 'whole word recognition'? isolates languages, and English (the pretty much universal language today thanks to computing and the US's leadership) is a sponge of both lexicon and grammar from everywhere! I just wish spelling could be better taught, together with better diction. The tangles of 'as she is spoke' give caltrops on the highways of discourse, discussion? and communication in general.
p.s. I couldn't find Occulation or Oculation in my dictionaries - was there an accidental occidentalism?

73
Dex, ZL2DEX


-- 
W7HD - NAQCC#7587 OMISS#9898 KX3#6966 LinuxUser#415320


Re: The issues of the TDA2822

 


Greetings

UT Source is showing high stocks (34000) of TD2822M


We still think based on the finding of the GQRP club if using this chip it is better to drop the volts down to 5V using a regulator.




73 Steve


G1KQH


Re: The issues of the TDA2822

 

Probably a good idea.

I can think of several devices which I don't expect to disappear
anytime soon, like the LM324. Or even the JRD audio chips
or the NE5532. I am sure the guitar repair people are full of ideas
as well; they deal with this sort of thing all the time.

Still, I like the idea of a daughterboard which can be interfaced
to the motherboard with little more than adaptive pins, and possibly
additional wiring for adding an AVC or whatever...that is more in keeping
with the BITX idea (think of Sunil and his work) -- but it does go a bit out of the territory of modern
ham trends. In fact, though, it has already been done by adapting a DDS to the VFO
design. Look where that has gotten us. By the time we have gotten around
to the Teensy 3, we will be half way to a SDR. (Hi. Get ready, Arv.)

It is fascinating that the QCX has been so successful at the same time as
the newer BITX'ers are going in a different direction. These new hams are
phenomenal in their own right.

Whatever HF Signals comes up with is sure to be a hit with the BITX'ers.
So...go for it.

john
AD5YE


Re: The issues of the TDA2822

Gordon Gibby
 

NJM2073D. Also available at digikey . Good pick up Jerry

On Mar 7, 2018, at 00:11, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io <jgaffke@...> wrote:

NJM2073D


Re: Dynamic mic on ubitx

 

I solved my Dynamic mic problem by installing the 5 Band Mic Processor by UR8QW.? I mounted the potentiometers on the front panel so that I now have a mic processor with compression, mic level and output level.? Works beautifully with my dynamic mic.

My solution might cost a little more then many are willing to spend but it gives me the ability to fully adjust my mic and audio.

I am very pleased with my solution, so far.? I have just installed it so operation over a number of coming days will be revealing.

A couple of more mods ought to have my UBITX completed.

--
73, W9KJO
Walter


Re: The issues of the TDA2822

 

John, others,

Given our experience of the non-generic ICs going out of production, it is best to stick to either discrete or generic ICs. The bitx20 will soon be a 15 year old design. The NorCal is probably older and still being built. We will have to choose parts that are going to be around for a long time, that are easily substituted. This means, we must work with large design margins, discrete or generic ICs.?

Given these limitations, we are pretty much limited to either op-amps or discrete devices.?

Opinions?


- f

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Konstantinos Konstas <constantine170@...> wrote:
Hi all.
A discrete components design could be more tolerable imho.
Plus it leaves more space for hacks/mods.
Possibly on a small boatd.
Konstantinos, SV1ONW.

On Mar 7, 2018 07:48, "N8DAH" <Dherron@...> wrote:

I put this in today just drop right in and its part status is active


--
David

?N8DAH



Re: TDA2822 experiments and mods

 

So far no issues with my TDA2822L, but since replacement I power off before touching the jacks

As my case is still open I use Arvo's technique to probe the IC. So far no heat issues.

John


Re: TDA2822 experiments and mods

 

I've blown up quite some TDA2822 audio chips and they seem to be working on the edge of their ratings. My uBitx has a built-in speaker wired through a 3,5 mm jack which switches it off when a headphone jack is plugged in. It took me some time before out that this switching process cost me some TDA's. It's very likely the jack connector shorts the audio for a short periode while plugging in.?

Indeed solved by adding a series resistor.

73, Alex
PA1FOX