¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: software problem

Jeff Davis
 

Hi Gary... well you hit the nail on the head. I put all the ino's one after the other and it compiled ok.
However, the Bitx goes into cw mode and sends code?

I dropped each ino in the editor one after the other as listed starting from the top of the list... Is there any particular order?

I'm going to try the newer code with the CAT and I read the cw is improved......

Thanks for the help...


Ubitx V4, looking for a silkscreen pcb printout showing component placement.

Robert McClements
 

Trying to debug a faulty ubitx v4 with old eyes so an electronic copy of the component placement or board silkscreen would really help.

73 Bob GM4CID


Re: [BITX20...build idea

 

Saved that site. But on that page they only have
Push-On Knobs - "D" Shaft which means 1/4-in "bore"
or hole and I did not see one for a smaller shaft. May
on another page.

Thanks for the website. May come in handy some day.

Bob ¡ª KK5R

--------------------------------------------

On Wed, 12/19/18, Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...> wrote:

Subject: Re: [BITX20] [BITX20...build idea
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Bob Lunsford via Groups.Io" <nocrud222@...>
Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2018, 2:10 PM


Knobs with all different sizes of bore...







Or fill 1/4 knob with epoxy after greasing the set
screw and all the way in; ?remove set screw after hardening
, center drill to whatever size you prefer......










On Dec 19, 2018, at 13:01, Ian Reeve <ian.radioworkshop@...>
wrote:







the knobs can be found at radio rallies or hamfest but much
easier to change for a standard sized pot of the correct
value.You could also at a pinch pad out the thin shaft by
wrapping with electrical tape or similar.I used one with the
split splines shaft type
commonly found on all suppliers.? Ian M0IDR






Get
Outlook for Android




From:
[email protected]
<[email protected]>
on behalf of iz oos <and2oosiz2@...>

Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 5:46:32 PM

To: [email protected]

Cc: Bob Lunsford via Groups.Io

Subject: Re: [BITX20] [BITX20...build idea
?


I couldn't find the right volume knob too. So I ended
up finding those wire connectors with two vertical screws.
In the end, admittedly it is a bit ugly, but does well the
job.



Il 19/dic/2018 14:09,
"Rajan Krs via Groups.Io" <rajankrs@...>
ha scritto:












On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 8:19 AM, Bob Lunsford via
Groups.Io
<nocrud222@...
> wrote:




I saw somewhere a comment about the knobs.
The encoder knob is


not a problem since it has a pretty much
standard size shaft diameter.


However, the volume control shaft is
smaller.






I've seen knobs on old clock radios that are this
diameter size but


when I could not lay my hands on the right
knob immediately, I began


to wonder what I could use in the meantime





I used a twist-on wirenut designed for large
size wires. It is yellow



in color ¡ª colors denote splice size.





Twisting it on the shaft provides a usable
knob for the volume control



knob. I suggest using some caution when
putting the wirenut on the



shaft, though, no need for it to be gorilla
tight. Make it tight enough




only to turn radio on and off. Also, if the wirenut
"knob" is not straight


on the shaft, it is easy to move it to the
proper position and make it


straight on the shaft and more what one would
expect of a knob.







Sure, you can go to Mouser and sqqa ASelect parts to
one's heart's content



but this "fix" allows immediate use
even if waiting for that Mouser


package. For me, I want a usable radio and
not a display model even


though I want it to look good. This temporary
"fix: works for me.







Hope this helps someone.






Bob ¡ª KK5R


Re: [BITX20...build idea

 

When I'm building and need an item that is not handy,
the first thing I do is look around to see what I already
have to use in the old experimenter's tradition.

I thought about the shrink tubing idea ¡ª it's a good one
but figured I'd need several layers to make it fit into
a standard knob's hole. While I was looking around,
I saw the wirenuts.

I did not immediately use one for this but then grabbed
one to try it. It only took a couple of seconds and voila,
it was all done and not worth looking around for some
other "fix."

The next hamfest will find such a knob on the list for
what I'll need to bring back home. I know i have that
kind of knob in a container here somewhere and may
find it before then, though.

However, because the layout on my radio has the
other connectors plugged into the front panel, such
as the Microphone plug, the volume control knob
sticking out farther makes it easier to use. Therefore,
I'm thinking this is a good way to go, at least for now.

When I go show off the radio, if anyone comments on
the way I did the knob, I'll tell them to go buy a UBITX
of their own and do it the way THEY want it to be. Ha

Bob ¡ª KK5R

--------------------------------------------

On Wed, 12/19/18, Ted via Groups.Io <k3rta@...> wrote:

Subject: Re: [BITX20] [BITX20...build idea
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2018, 2:00 PM

A short length of heat-shrink
tubing, just length of the shaft and a size that will shrink
nice & tight, will usually take up the slack between
this shaft size and a more standard 1/4" knob
opening.
-ted


Re: designer mods

 

The only mention of the radio needing mods to be legal is on the ubitx.net page, It reads as follows.
WARNING: AS shipped, your ubitx probably will not be compliant with emission requirements.It has been found to generate spurs and harmonics.
There are now simple fixes available to address these issues. Make sure you apply them prior to operating the transceiver on an antenna.

Now that's good and fine. I have the skill to make and design mods to the unit. I and very few others have the test equipment to make these mods and verify they work. Besides there are dozens of "fixes" which one. What we need id the designer to make the required mods on a new radio. Verify that it is legal via spectrum analyzer commercial grade.not some inaccurate SDR toy and approve the fixes as working. Not some vague remark 'Simple fixes available" from a web sight that may or may not be associated with the designer.
Point is if he is a manufacturer of a product he has the responsibility to his buyers and future buyers to at least solve the problems. On person implied there are 'Benz's and Kia's you can't expect a radio this cheap to be a 'Benz. That is true but both Mercedes and Kia are required to operate safely and legally or be recalled.? My version 4 goes into the junk drawer until this Kia meets its specifications....sad. That's my 3 cents worth.


Re: [BITX20...build idea

 

The wirenut I used is the twist-on type. No screws. But I don't
know what you are using but if it works for you, good.

I also only have syringes for diabetes that don't seem appropriate
for making knobs. They are clear white and I can see that the
yellow "fix" knob is better. I also wondered about some bottle lids
and a hole forming shaft that is "potted" with some kind of epoxy
or heat stick glue but the wirenut won out so that thought is nothing
more than a remote memory now.

Bob ¡ª KK5R

--------------------------------------------

On Wed, 12/19/18, iz oos <and2oosiz2@...> wrote:

Subject: Re: [BITX20] [BITX20...build idea
To: [email protected]
Cc: "Bob Lunsford via Groups.Io" <nocrud222@...>
Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2018, 12:46 PM

I couldn't find the right
volume knob too. So I ended up finding those wire connectors
with two vertical screws. In the end, admittedly it is a bit
ugly, but does well the job.

Il 19/dic/2018 14:09,
"Rajan Krs via Groups.Io" <rajankrs@...>
ha scritto:





On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 8:19 AM, Bob Lunsford via
Groups.Io<nocrud222@...
> wrote: I saw
somewhere a comment about the knobs. The encoder knob is
not a problem since it has a pretty
much standard size shaft diameter.
However, the volume control shaft is
smaller.

I've
seen knobs on old clock radios that are this diameter size
but
when I could not lay my hands on the
right knob immediately, I began
to wonder what I could use in the
meantime

I used a twist-on wirenut designed for
large size wires. It is yellow
in color ¡ª colors denote splice size.


Twisting it on the shaft provides a
usable knob for the volume control
knob. I suggest using some caution when
putting the wirenut on the
shaft, though, no need for it to be
gorilla tight. Make it tight enough
only
to turn radio on and off. Also, if the wirenut
"knob" is not straight
on the shaft, it is easy to move it to
the proper position and make it
straight on the shaft and more what one
would expect of a knob.

Sure,
you can go to Mouser and sqqa ASelect parts to one's
heart's content
but this "fix" allows immediate use even
if waiting for that Mouser
package. For me, I want a usable radio
and not a display model even
though I want it to look good. This
temporary "fix: works for me.

Hope
this helps someone.

Bob
¡ª KK5R


Re: designer mods

 

RE " I would agree that I would still purchase the kit if it was listed on the HF Signals site as a "kit" that will need to be upgraded. I have gone back and re-read the home page, and there is no reference to the need to be modified, nor even that anything other than assembly being required."

I put emphasis on the word "hackable" as seen in various forms on the UBITIX website. This, to me, means that it is not legally usable unless it is "hacked" or modified to meet spec. It seemed that heavy emphasis was on the experimental side of the kit. I use mine now for listening but will be more into the transmit acceptability when I get ready to transmit and if this means a box connected to the antenna jack with a series of low pass filters to make it right, then that will be done. I leave the serious hacking to others who seem to see this as a challenge.

I also read all the comments from the group and if there is a fix that nails it, I will be interested. Meanwhile, if it takes some more filtering on the output, I will do this with the idea that most of my activity is on 40 and 80 meters with 17M visited occasionally.

Bob ¡ª KK5R

--------------------------------------------

On Tue, 12/18/18, Evan Hand <elhandjr@...> wrote:

Subject: Re: [BITX20] designer mods
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, December 18, 2018, 10:09 PM

Since I have been
monitoring all of the Bitx threads (only for the last 3
months), I have come to understand that the uBitx is a kit
that really needs to be worked on to make fully
"legal" in the USA.? I would agree that I would
still purchase the kit if it was listed on the HF Signals
site as a "kit" that will need to be upgraded.? I
have gone back and re-read the home page, and there is no
reference to the need to be modified, nor even that anything
other than assembly being required.
Until the production versions include the
modifications needed to be legal, I think that there should
be a "modifications may be required" type of
warning on the web page.? After all, even hams such as
myself who are willing to modify (yes, may even enjoy it)
would not have all of the needed equipment to verify that
the rig will be operating within legal requirements.? They
may, as am I, be looking to use it as a base that other
kits, like a linear, will be added to later, and have a self
built rig (not quite home brew) that they can be proud
of.
I am very pleased with the purchases that I have
made, however I do see others' points on the need to
have a clear way to make it right.? From the information on
this site I believe that those changes are now known and
documented.?
In my opinion the new kits should have the parts
and directions to make it legal.? New product boards should
use the correct relays, as that is only a parts issue, and
include the two wound toroids and cap to correct the spurs
issue.? This would be until the board layout can be changed
and the fix included in the board layout.? Also,
documentation on the fixes should be on the HF Signals web
site so hams do not need to go searching all over the web to
find the corrections.
I would request that others go back and read the
"advertising" page and comment back on their
opinion.? Ashhar has done a good job in making this
available, however there is a responsibility to take
corrective action when a defect becomes
known.??
RespectfullyEvanAC9TU


Re: designer mods

 

G1WDF,

V4 was a audio amp mod only from TDA2822 to discrete transistor and?
it brought out a few test points.? Same circuit for RF and same issues.

Maybe when V5 happens.


Re: Low output on CW UBITX

 

From the last mixer to the antenna CW and SSB are same.

I've seen at least two with a wrong 40M LPF, though it was TX power amp but 80 and 20
had higher power than 40.
Seems the coils had about half the number of turns, they were likely 10M coils and the
caps were also questionable for correct value.? Rewound and recaped it then produced
normal power.

So it can be simple but not obvious.

Allison


Re: No audio from last week may have a solution

 

Where exactly? is C4? I just can't see it? - neither in the schematic nor on the board?


Re: software problem

 

Jeff,
Appears that you are trying to compile just a single ".ino" file (i.e. ubitx_20).? You are missing the remaining required .ino files in the directory as supplied by HFsigs.
Not the best coding practice, but that's how it was done.
Regards,
Gary


Re: [BITX20...build idea

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Knobs with all different sizes of bore...


Or fill 1/4 knob with epoxy after greasing the set screw and all the way in; ?remove set screw after hardening , center drill to whatever size you prefer......




On Dec 19, 2018, at 13:01, Ian Reeve <ian.radioworkshop@...> wrote:

the knobs can be found at radio rallies or hamfest but much easier to change for a standard sized pot of the correct value.You could also at a pinch pad out the thin shaft by wrapping with electrical tape or similar.I used one with the split splines shaft type commonly found on all suppliers.? Ian M0IDR

Get


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of iz oos <and2oosiz2@...>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 5:46:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Bob Lunsford via Groups.Io
Subject: Re: [BITX20] [BITX20...build idea
?

I couldn't find the right volume knob too. So I ended up finding those wire connectors with two vertical screws. In the end, admittedly it is a bit ugly, but does well the job.


Il 19/dic/2018 14:09, "Rajan Krs via Groups.Io" <rajankrs=[email protected]> ha scritto:



On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 8:19 AM, Bob Lunsford via Groups.Io
<nocrud222=[email protected]> wrote:
I saw somewhere a comment about the knobs. The encoder knob is
not a problem since it has a pretty much standard size shaft diameter.
However, the volume control shaft is smaller.

I've seen knobs on old clock radios that are this diameter size but
when I could not lay my hands on the right knob immediately, I began
to wonder what I could use in the meantime

I used a twist-on wirenut designed for large size wires. It is yellow
in color ¡ª colors denote splice size.

Twisting it on the shaft provides a usable knob for the volume control
knob. I suggest using some caution when putting the wirenut on the
shaft, though, no need for it to be gorilla tight. Make it tight enough
only to turn radio on and off. Also, if the wirenut "knob" is not straight
on the shaft, it is easy to move it to the proper position and make it
straight on the shaft and more what one would expect of a knob.

Sure, you can go to Mouser and sqqa ASelect parts to one's heart's content
but this "fix" allows immediate use even if waiting for that Mouser
package. For me, I want a usable radio and not a display model even
though I want it to look good. This temporary "fix: works for me.

Hope this helps someone.

Bob ¡ª KK5R




Re: [BITX20...build idea

 

A short length of heat-shrink tubing, just length of the shaft and a size that will shrink nice & tight, will usually take up the slack between this shaft size and a more standard 1/4" knob opening.

-ted


Re: software problem

Jack Purdum
 

It depends. If the function is used before it's defined, yes. The IDE is supposed to get around this problem, but I've had times when only the addition of a prototype fixed it. I cannot isolate the bug, so I'm not sure why that happens sometimes. It's easier to add the prototype than to try and figure out why.

Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, December 19, 2018, 12:53:46 PM EST, W2CTX <w2ctx@...> wrote:


If the sketch is all .ino files do you need a declaration.


> On December 19, 2018 at 12:07 PM "Jack Purdum via Groups.Io" <jjpurdum=[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>? Oops! Read the wrong function. There should be a function prototype for? si5351bx_setfreq(). Try adding its prototype near the top of the code if it's missing or not in a header file.
> Jack, W8TEE
>
>
>? ? ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <jjpurdum=[email protected]>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018, 12:03:23 PM ESTSubject: Re: [BITX20] software problem
>? Is there a function prototype for setFrequency() near the top of the code or in a header file? While I am not familiar with the code, my guess is that the argument to the function is either a long or unsigned long data type. Try adding:
> void? setFrequency(unsigned long ritRxFrequency);
>
> just after the #include's and see if that helps. If not, drop the unsigned and try again. If that fails, go have a beer.
>
> Jack, W8TEE
>
>? ? On Wednesday, December 19, 2018, 11:56:31 AM EST, Jeff Davis via Groups.Io <ve3coj=[email protected]> wrote:
>
>? I have a version 3 board. I tried loading the original software for the nano and I am getting an error messages.
> 'si5351bx_setfreq' was not declared in this scope. Part of the code is shown below. I don't understand why the code will not work as is.? Thanks in advance.
> Jeff... ve3coj
>
> void stopTx(){
> ? inTx = 0;
>
> ? digitalWrite(TX_RX, 0);? ? ? ? ? //turn off the tx
> ? si5351bx_setfreq(0, usbCarrier);? //set back the cardrier oscillator anyway, cw tx switches it off
>
> ? if (ritOn)
> ? ? setFrequency(ritRxFrequency);
> ? else{
>
>
>
>
>
>



Re: [BITX20...build idea

Ian Reeve
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

the knobs can be found at radio rallies or hamfest but much easier to change for a standard sized pot of the correct value.You could also at a pinch pad out the thin shaft by wrapping with electrical tape or similar.I used one with the split splines shaft type commonly found on all suppliers.? Ian M0IDR

Get


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of iz oos <and2oosiz2@...>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 5:46:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Bob Lunsford via Groups.Io
Subject: Re: [BITX20] [BITX20...build idea
?

I couldn't find the right volume knob too. So I ended up finding those wire connectors with two vertical screws. In the end, admittedly it is a bit ugly, but does well the job.


Il 19/dic/2018 14:09, "Rajan Krs via Groups.Io" <rajankrs=[email protected]> ha scritto:



On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 8:19 AM, Bob Lunsford via Groups.Io
<nocrud222=[email protected]> wrote:
I saw somewhere a comment about the knobs. The encoder knob is
not a problem since it has a pretty much standard size shaft diameter.
However, the volume control shaft is smaller.

I've seen knobs on old clock radios that are this diameter size but
when I could not lay my hands on the right knob immediately, I began
to wonder what I could use in the meantime

I used a twist-on wirenut designed for large size wires. It is yellow
in color ¡ª colors denote splice size.

Twisting it on the shaft provides a usable knob for the volume control
knob. I suggest using some caution when putting the wirenut on the
shaft, though, no need for it to be gorilla tight. Make it tight enough
only to turn radio on and off. Also, if the wirenut "knob" is not straight
on the shaft, it is easy to move it to the proper position and make it
straight on the shaft and more what one would expect of a knob.

Sure, you can go to Mouser and sqqa ASelect parts to one's heart's content
but this "fix" allows immediate use even if waiting for that Mouser
package. For me, I want a usable radio and not a display model even
though I want it to look good. This temporary "fix: works for me.

Hope this helps someone.

Bob ¡ª KK5R




Re: Fw: [BITX20] software problem

 

If the sketch is all .ino files do you need a declaration.

On December 19, 2018 at 12:07 PM "Jack Purdum via Groups.Io" <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


Oops! Read the wrong function. There should be a function prototype for si5351bx_setfreq(). Try adding its prototype near the top of the code if it's missing or not in a header file.
Jack, W8TEE


----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <jjpurdum@...>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018, 12:03:23 PM ESTSubject: Re: [BITX20] software problem
Is there a function prototype for setFrequency() near the top of the code or in a header file? While I am not familiar with the code, my guess is that the argument to the function is either a long or unsigned long data type. Try adding:
void? setFrequency(unsigned long ritRxFrequency);

just after the #include's and see if that helps. If not, drop the unsigned and try again. If that fails, go have a beer.

Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, December 19, 2018, 11:56:31 AM EST, Jeff Davis via Groups.Io <ve3coj@...> wrote:

I have a version 3 board. I tried loading the original software for the nano and I am getting an error messages.
'si5351bx_setfreq' was not declared in this scope. Part of the code is shown below. I don't understand why the code will not work as is.? Thanks in advance.
Jeff... ve3coj

void stopTx(){
? inTx = 0;

? digitalWrite(TX_RX, 0);? ? ? ? ? //turn off the tx
? si5351bx_setfreq(0, usbCarrier);? //set back the cardrier oscillator anyway, cw tx switches it off

? if (ritOn)
? ? setFrequency(ritRxFrequency);
? else{






Re: [BITX20...build idea

 

I couldn't find the right volume knob too. So I ended up finding those wire connectors with two vertical screws. In the end, admittedly it is a bit ugly, but does well the job.


Il 19/dic/2018 14:09, "Rajan Krs via Groups.Io" <rajankrs=[email protected]> ha scritto:



On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 8:19 AM, Bob Lunsford via Groups.Io
<nocrud222=[email protected]> wrote:
I saw somewhere a comment about the knobs. The encoder knob is
not a problem since it has a pretty much standard size shaft diameter.
However, the volume control shaft is smaller.

I've seen knobs on old clock radios that are this diameter size but
when I could not lay my hands on the right knob immediately, I began
to wonder what I could use in the meantime

I used a twist-on wirenut designed for large size wires. It is yellow
in color ¡ª colors denote splice size.

Twisting it on the shaft provides a usable knob for the volume control
knob. I suggest using some caution when putting the wirenut on the
shaft, though, no need for it to be gorilla tight. Make it tight enough
only to turn radio on and off. Also, if the wirenut "knob" is not straight
on the shaft, it is easy to move it to the proper position and make it
straight on the shaft and more what one would expect of a knob.

Sure, you can go to Mouser and sqqa ASelect parts to one's heart's content
but this "fix" allows immediate use even if waiting for that Mouser
package. For me, I want a usable radio and not a display model even
though I want it to look good. This temporary "fix: works for me.

Hope this helps someone.

Bob ¡ª KK5R




Fw: [BITX20] software problem

Jack Purdum
 

Oops! Read the wrong function. There should be a function prototype for si5351bx_setfreq(). Try adding its prototype near the top of the code if it's missing or not in a header file.

Jack, W8TEE


----- Forwarded Message -----

From: Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <jjpurdum@...>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018, 12:03:23 PM EST
Subject: Re: [BITX20] software problem

Is there a function prototype for setFrequency() near the top of the code or in a header file? While I am not familiar with the code, my guess is that the argument to the function is either a long or unsigned long data type. Try adding:

void? setFrequency(unsigned long ritRxFrequency);

just after the #include's and see if that helps. If not, drop the unsigned and try again. If that fails, go have a beer.


Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, December 19, 2018, 11:56:31 AM EST, Jeff Davis via Groups.Io <ve3coj@...> wrote:


I have a version 3 board. I tried loading the original software for the nano and I am getting an error messages.
'si5351bx_setfreq' was not declared in this scope. Part of the code is shown below. I don't understand why the code will not work as is.? Thanks in advance.
Jeff... ve3coj

void stopTx(){
? inTx = 0;

? digitalWrite(TX_RX, 0);? ? ? ? ? //turn off the tx
? si5351bx_setfreq(0, usbCarrier);? //set back the cardrier oscillator anyway, cw tx switches it off

? if (ritOn)
? ? setFrequency(ritRxFrequency);
? else{



Re: software problem

Jack Purdum
 

Is there a function prototype for setFrequency() near the top of the code or in a header file? While I am not familiar with the code, my guess is that the argument to the function is either a long or unsigned long data type. Try adding:

void? setFrequency(unsigned long ritRxFrequency);

just after the #include's and see if that helps. If not, drop the unsigned and try again. If that fails, go have a beer.


Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, December 19, 2018, 11:56:31 AM EST, Jeff Davis via Groups.Io <ve3coj@...> wrote:


I have a version 3 board. I tried loading the original software for the nano and I am getting an error messages.
'si5351bx_setfreq' was not declared in this scope. Part of the code is shown below. I don't understand why the code will not work as is.? Thanks in advance.
Jeff... ve3coj

void stopTx(){
? inTx = 0;

? digitalWrite(TX_RX, 0);? ? ? ? ? //turn off the tx
? si5351bx_setfreq(0, usbCarrier);? //set back the cardrier oscillator anyway, cw tx switches it off

? if (ritOn)
? ? setFrequency(ritRxFrequency);
? else{



Re: No audio from last week may have a solution

 

Sean

Rarely can a capacitor be replaced with a short circuit. Often it is blocking DC, or filtering it. Sometimes it can stay open, but likely the cap is necessary. You result seems to say so. See if you can find a similar value cap. Okay to leave the broken one in place, as long as it isn't a DC short.

Curt