Re: designer mods
|
RE " I would agree that I would still purchase the kit if it was listed on the HF Signals site as a "kit" that will need to be upgraded. I have gone back and re-read the home page, and there is no reference to the need to be modified, nor even that anything other than assembly being required."
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I put emphasis on the word "hackable" as seen in various forms on the UBITIX website. This, to me, means that it is not legally usable unless it is "hacked" or modified to meet spec. It seemed that heavy emphasis was on the experimental side of the kit. I use mine now for listening but will be more into the transmit acceptability when I get ready to transmit and if this means a box connected to the antenna jack with a series of low pass filters to make it right, then that will be done. I leave the serious hacking to others who seem to see this as a challenge. I also read all the comments from the group and if there is a fix that nails it, I will be interested. Meanwhile, if it takes some more filtering on the output, I will do this with the idea that most of my activity is on 40 and 80 meters with 17M visited occasionally. Bob ¡ª KK5R -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 12/18/18, Evan Hand <elhandjr@...> wrote:
Subject: Re: [BITX20] designer mods To: [email protected] Date: Tuesday, December 18, 2018, 10:09 PM Since I have been monitoring all of the Bitx threads (only for the last 3 months), I have come to understand that the uBitx is a kit that really needs to be worked on to make fully "legal" in the USA.? I would agree that I would still purchase the kit if it was listed on the HF Signals site as a "kit" that will need to be upgraded.? I have gone back and re-read the home page, and there is no reference to the need to be modified, nor even that anything other than assembly being required. Until the production versions include the modifications needed to be legal, I think that there should be a "modifications may be required" type of warning on the web page.? After all, even hams such as myself who are willing to modify (yes, may even enjoy it) would not have all of the needed equipment to verify that the rig will be operating within legal requirements.? They may, as am I, be looking to use it as a base that other kits, like a linear, will be added to later, and have a self built rig (not quite home brew) that they can be proud of. I am very pleased with the purchases that I have made, however I do see others' points on the need to have a clear way to make it right.? From the information on this site I believe that those changes are now known and documented.? In my opinion the new kits should have the parts and directions to make it legal.? New product boards should use the correct relays, as that is only a parts issue, and include the two wound toroids and cap to correct the spurs issue.? This would be until the board layout can be changed and the fix included in the board layout.? Also, documentation on the fixes should be on the HF Signals web site so hams do not need to go searching all over the web to find the corrections. I would request that others go back and read the "advertising" page and comment back on their opinion.? Ashhar has done a good job in making this available, however there is a responsibility to take corrective action when a defect becomes known.?? RespectfullyEvanAC9TU |
Bob Lunsford