Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- 7x12MiniLathe
- Messages
Search
Re: 7X14 mini-lathe
Here's some info that may be of interest:
Frank Hoose --- copascetic1 <copascetic1@...> wrote:
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site |
Re: 7X14 mini-lathe
In a message dated 11/15/2002 4:26:22 AM Atlantic Standard Time,
fhoose@... writes: Read your review many time before I purchased my 7X14. I had written to you quite some time ago how thru the largesse of a friend of mine I had the opportunity to "play" with a 9X20 and a 7X10. 9X too big, too many mods to bring it up to speed, 7X many features I liked, variable speed,tumblers, etc., too small. The 7X14 was just right, reminded me of a SB I had many years ago. I am very pleased with the 7X14, just wanted to know what other owners may have experienced with it "under fire" |
Lathe Accuracy
Good Morning All:
After much checking and testing of my Homier 7x12 lathe, I removed the hs assembly, and found the cause of the alignment problem. The locating vee way was gouged out during the machining process, causing the spindle to be out of alignment with the bed assembly. Back to front of the spindle measured a difference of 0.004" difference, and the difference in height between the hs and ts assembly showed the hs to be 0.125" low. A new hs casting is on order, and hopefully, this will correct the alignment problems. I am in the process of replacing the saddle gibs with new ones of brass while waiting for the hs casting,and giving everything a good once over. Other than this setback, I believe these lathes to be a good value for the money, and appear to be quite capable machines. I want to thank everyone for all the help in getting to the root cause of my problem with this lathe (taper turning), and look forward to reporting my progress. Nick |
Re: center to center
Paul W. Chamberlain
Generally very true. Usually the only detractors for a longer bed are budget and shop space.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
When considering how the extra length would be useful, remember all the work that can be done with the tailstock. Drilling, reaming, tapping and threading with a die. These operations can consume quite a bit of the tool space. Especially when you add the length of threading tool holders. Many Model Engineer experts recommend using taps and dies for threads 1/4" and smaller. And sometimes, it's just nice to be able to move the tailstock out of the way without having to remove it from the bed. Paul, Central OR franksjoy@... wrote: So, that would imply, as to lathe size, the bigger the better, no? |
Re: center to center
Paul W. Chamberlain
No...
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
With the HF 7x10, the working distance with the chuck mounted is more like 8". They use the older convention of distance between tapered centers mounted at both the headstock and tailstock to get 10". Also, the headstock spindle bore would not take 1" stock for trying to hold the bolt by its shank with just the head exposed. The bore is just under 13/16", and some users have used a reamer to open it up to a full 13/16". Paul, Central OR franksjoy@... wrote: Retaining the same dimensions you gave, could you do it on a 7X10? |
Re: center to center
Paul W. Chamberlain
Frankie,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
For the lack of a better example, I'll try this one... Imagine you had a big 1" bolt, 12" long. You want to face the underside of the head, and turn the flats off the bottom 1/8" of the hex portion. You could hold the top portion of the bolt head in the chuck, and support the threaded end of the bolt at the tailstock. All of the work would take place within a 1" area near the chuck, but the between center space allows the full length handling of the project. Paul, Central OR lathechuck wrote: With all the talk about bed length, it seems to me the only space that matters is how much space you have between the work piece in a chuck and tool bit in the compound |
Re: Ck'g Tailstock
Bob Colquitt
Nick,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I'm on digest mode so my response is slow coming. First thing to do is pull your tailstock off and ck for burrs, rough spots, etc. after you do the initial alignment ck. Use a small, fine file to ease off. To ck for hi/lo spots, use markup dye [Magic Marker will work also] and a good straightedge on the wear surfaces of the TS. To clean small areas, I use toilet paper dipped in rubbing alcohol - any burr/rough spot will tear the paper. Need to remember to re-oil afterwards as RA has water in it. Might also pull your headstock and ck also if you find anything on the tailstock. The reason why is after you use the lathe, the headstock could settle and your alignment would be off again. That's the problem with the Chinese stuff - in order to keep it cheap, shortcuts are taken. Besides, taking the lathe apart will teach you a lot. Keep some bandaids and hydrogen peroxide around because the burrs can be sharp! -=- Bob Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:51:25 -0800 (PST) From: Nick DeFeo <ntdefeo@...> |
Re: Correcting Lathe accuracy
Here's a link to an article by Jose Rodriguez that may
be helpful. Also some info by Rick Kruger --- ntdefeo <ntdefeo@...> wrote: Good Morning Frank, __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now |
Re: Correcting Lathe accuracy
Good Morning Bob:
I appreciate the quick response and will try this method. Should the ts prove to be too high, would it be better to shim the hs, or lower the ts with some careful filing of the base assembly? I realize some of the problem is due to the carriage assembly needing adjustment, and will tend to that issue prior to testing the hs/ts alignment. Thanks for the info. Sincerely, Nick Bob Colquitt <wahsatch@...> wrote:Nick, Was reading in an old PM Shop Notes last night a possible solution. Buy yourself a piece of ground drill rod a touch over 10" long - something which will go thru the spindle - 1/2" dia.? Center in your chuck and center drill both ends. Mark a spot near both ends with the marks 10" apart. Put centers in both your spindle and tailstock and mount your test rod. Mount a dial indicator in your tool post and ck the height on the rod at both marks and then ck the side at both marks. This will quickly tell you if your tailstock is too hi/lo, off to one side or the other, or both. From there you will be able to know what is off. Good Luck, -=- Bob Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:16:31 -0000Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 7x12minilathe-unsubscribe@... Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now |
Re: Correcting Lathe accuracy
Bob Colquitt
Nick,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Was reading in an old PM Shop Notes last night a possible solution. Buy yourself a piece of ground drill rod a touch over 10" long - something which will go thru the spindle - 1/2" dia.? Center in your chuck and center drill both ends. Mark a spot near both ends with the marks 10" apart. Put centers in both your spindle and tailstock and mount your test rod. Mount a dial indicator in your tool post and ck the height on the rod at both marks and then ck the side at both marks. This will quickly tell you if your tailstock is too hi/lo, off to one side or the other, or both. From there you will be able to know what is off. Good Luck, -=- Bob Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:16:31 -0000 |
Re: Correcting Lathe accuracy
Good Morning Frank,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I am turning 1/2" dia 6061 aluminum and 1/2" 12L14 stock. Using a dial indicator on the carriage, I am seeing .010" reading from the chuck (standard 3 jaw) to the ts, measuring against the rear of the stock. On the top of the stock, I am seeing a 020" from the chuck to the ts, with the live center bearing on the stock, or not. Is it possible the hs is not correctly aligned with the bed, and ts height? I am a former machinist, although that was many years ago, and am just getting back into it as a hobby. I was thinking that either shimming the hs to the ts height to correct the difference, and perhaps some judicial filing of the hs base to correct the parallelism to the bed. Any tricks you could provide would be greatly appreciated. Best regards, Nick -- In 7x12minilathe@y..., Frank Hoose <fhoose@y...> wrote:
It seems unlikely to me that the HS is out of |
Re: Correcting Lathe accuracy
It seems unlikely to me that the HS is out of
alignment. The TS easily could be, but you can get it close enough for most work by simply turning a point onto a piece of stock using the compound and bringing the point of a dead center mounted in the TS to meet it (see photo). What diameter stock are you turning and how are you holding it? Frank Hoose --- ntdefeo <ntdefeo@...> wrote: Good Morning All: __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now |
Correcting Lathe accuracy
Good Morning All:
Having trouble setting up a Homier 7X12 lathe recently purchased. This lathe is turning a taper from tailstock to headstock no matter how much adjustment I make to correct tailstock setover. Is it possible that the tail and head are not set parallel to eachother? Has anyone else run across the same difficulty? Any advice on this problem, with methods to correct it would be greatly appreciated, as this little unit appears to be a good value for the money. Best regards, Nick |
Messages
More
More Options
More
to navigate to use esc to dismiss