开云体育

I had the same problem because my qrz email was not the same as the email I used to join this group. I changed my qrz email so that it synced up with the Group.io and it still got rejected...over and

I didn't know there was another group.U need need a call sign to learn about the radio. What if someone is trying to learn about it for someone else who does have a call sign who doesn't have time to

If you could that would be great. Could you tell me what the data means since I don't know anything about it? I didn't realize you can have spurious emissions on receive so now I'm curious about

You would make my life a lot easier if you provided real comparisons of versions. For example, using a second (reference) transceiver loaded onto the equivalent of an antenna from which telegraph

I have a good spectrum analyzer good to 1.5 GHz.? I have looked at other rigs, mostly VHF and UHF rigs.? Most of the Chinese rigs do look rather bad. I might look at my X6100. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron

Eh, they convinced me... I did this with the settings. "None" acceleration, "Lite" acceleration x5, x10 and "Strong" acceleration x10, x30. Will appear in the next release

That would be a good feature.? Some other rigs have this slow tuning and jump to quicker/faster tuning when rotate tuning knob fast. I have always had issues with the X6100 tune, seems to slow in 10

I was using R1CBU v19 firmware and was trying to get the CAT function to work with N3FJP AC Log.? I've found N3FJP, AC Log, to be perfect for POTA because the fields can be changed and rearranged.?

Not sure what group you are talking about , maybe the "Xiegu X6100 owners" FB group. I think they are trying to prevent spammers from joining so they can post non-X6100 material. I use different email

Same here with me about CW-Decoder in v0.19 is bad Sent: Monday, December 18, 2023 6:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [xiegu-x6100] New version 0.19.0 #R1CBU-Firmware I have the same

Hi what is it like with a dummy load connected, As it sounds like fr is getting in, Dave

Jim, Yes, I had the same problem with my joining the other group being rejected because I didn't have the Email I used be the "QRZ email" that includes my call sign. I don't have a QRZ Email, as I

I had a Kenwood TS-50S and it used "fuzzy logic" to implement a similar feature. The faster you turned the encoder the larger the step. As you slowed down your tuning rate the step got smaller. IMHO

I'm in both groups.

Good afternoon everyone. When the X6100 group was formed I had one of the first X6100 radios and joined the group. I was also appointed as one of the admins at the time and was not asked if I wanted

I’m in both groups wrote:

I was just wondering if anyone here was also on the other X6100 group on groups.io?? ?I am trying to learn everything I can about this radio, so I tried to also join the other group.? However, I

I recently (a month ago) purchased a x6100 and an XPA125b amplifier and I m having this issue..a link of a video to help you explain myself https://m.youtube.com/watch?v= zeijQTFQo6E (

I just wanted to make sure this Radio doesn't put out spurious emissions above appropriate levels. I am going to get mine tested if I can find a way to do so as I don't have the equipment for it. For

I have the same experience as @scot forshaw, previous versions of the CW decoder worked amazingly well (especially compared with the Xiegu stock decoder). Latest updates indeed do not function well,