Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- W4dccqa
- Messages
Search
New file uploaded to WiringForDCC
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the WiringForDCC group. File : /MGL Dominos/INTERCHANGE DOMINOS.jpg Uploaded by : lafoote <lafoote@...> Description : Interchange Dominos - 12 Switches You can access this file at the URL: To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit: Regards, lafoote <lafoote@...> |
Atlas Code 55 NScale Turnouts
Michael
List,
I am in the process of trying to figure out how to wire the new Atlas Code 55 NScale Turnouts for a full DCC layout. I am using a Digitrax Chief System. Your wonderful website doesn't seem to address these turnouts. It seems to be a little out of date but it is still one of the best references on the Internet. I have a small Interchange section with 12 of them on it. Some creating crossovers and some for stubs. The new turnouts have a small tab on one side with a hole for soldering or using a screw. The instructions that come with them all reference to the Atlas switch machines BUT I am using Tortoise slow motion machines. I have been trying to figure it out before I burn up a bunch of decoders. Can you help me somehow? I am uploading a JPEG of the interchange for you to look at. IT has changed a little after the LDSIG gave me input but the design is almost identical except for the distances between the switches. Thanks in advance. Yours Truly, Mike Langford SOO Line 1964-67 |
Re: Resistance Soldering
wirefordcc
I'm glad to hear that people are watching the resistance soldering
video and getting something out of it. You're right, the solder doesn't stick to the hemostat. I think the hemostate is chrome plated. After about 7 years of use, some of the chrome has come off my hemostats. Occassionally, it now sticks. But until you mentioned it, I hadn't really thought about it. The solder never flows around the hemostat. It does sometimes flow under the jaw and does solder your wire and track together on the other side. But not as much as you might think. The reason is that the hemostat sucks a lot of heat away from the rail. So yes, things work out just like in the video. Happy Thanksgiving everyone! Remember, hemostats make great stocking stuffers. Resistance soldering stations make great Christmas presents. My wife says I don't need any more locomotives. If I don't need any more trains, what am I living for??? :-) |
Resistance Soldering
jmscnw
I will be purchasing a Resistance Soldering station soon but have
a question regarding demonstration video on WiringForDCC site: It appears you are clamping down other end of wire with a hemostat or other type of clamp. Won't the solder flow around the clamp and fuse itself to the rail ? This doesn't occur in the video clip so I am wondering how you accomplished this. |
Re: Terminating bus ends
The Newark part number is for a metal film resistor, Not wire wound.
I just like to see things run cool to the touch as much as possible. For 54 cents a resistor, it's money well spent. --- In WiringForDCC@..., Mark Gurries <gurriesm@c...> wrote: worse! touch. There is nothing wrong with using larger resistors if your goal isto reduce any discomfort you have in working with them or coming intoheat. Example: you could use 3 1/2W 39Ohm resistors in series. That willgive you a long 117 ohm 1.5W resistor. The resistance accuracy is notthe critical.hot.--- In WiringForDCC@..., "beckemeier53221" hot tothe touch.C317C104M5U5CA. |
Re: Terminating bus ends
Mark Gurries
Sorry...typo...39 ohm series...somehow I must have hit the zero button
right before I hit the send button. Mark, shouldn't that read .....1/2W 390Ohm resistors in "parallel"?Best Regards, Mark Gurries Linear Technology Power Supply & Battery Charger Applications Engineer/Manager --------------------------------------------------------- Model Railroad Club and NMRA DCC presentations are at: -------------------------------------------------------- Audio Enthusiast (Love SAE equipment) ---------------------------------------------------------- |
Re: Terminating bus ends
Power is an odd beast and is governed by I^2R .
In Series, I remains constant, but you break up your R (in series Resistance is addative), and therefore your voltage drop. You can arrive at the same result using Ohm's law, but it takes more steps; I think I^2 R is more illustrative. Just remember there is teh over all R and the individual Rs.... But the same applies in Parrallel (power-wise), but for different reasons. With parallel Resistance you need to work out the parrallel resistance formula, then ratio the current through the individual resistors, then apply I^2 R. For similarly sized components, each carries half the current. Basically, In series, for similarly size resistors, each carries the same current, but has a lower voltage drop (each device has half the drop). Whereas in parallel, each device carries half the current, but at the same voltage drop. That may seem confusing, but believe me, it's based on actual math. As my professors used to say: The proof is left as an exercise for the student! Does this help? |
Re: Terminating bus ends
kdkalit
Mark, shouldn't that read .....1/2W 390Ohm resistors in "parallel"?
I thought wattages are additive in parallel and resistance is additive in series? Or am I all mixed up? Ken --- In WiringForDCC@..., Mark Gurries <gurriesm@c...> wrote: heat. Example: you could use 3 1/2W 39Ohm resistors in series. Thatwill give you a long 117 ohm 1.5W resistor. The resistance accuracy is notthe critical.hot.--- In WiringForDCC@..., "beckemeier53221" V hotCapacitor. It really cleaned up the signal nice, and is not as toBest Regards,the touch.C317C104M5U5CA. |
Re: Terminating bus ends
kdkalit
Mark, shouldn't that read .....1/2W 390Ohm resistors in "parallel"?
I thought wattages are additive in parallel and resistance is additive in series? Or am I all mixed up? Ken --- In WiringForDCC@..., Mark Gurries <gurriesm@c...> wrote: heat. Example: you could use 3 1/2W 39Ohm resistors in series. Thatwill give you a long 117 ohm 1.5W resistor. The resistance accuracy is notthe critical.hot.--- In WiringForDCC@..., "beckemeier53221" V hotCapacitor. It really cleaned up the signal nice, and is not as toBest Regards,the touch.C317C104M5U5CA. |
Re: Terminating bus ends
Mark Gurries
Do not use wirewound resistors. They will actually make things worse!
Hot is a relative term. Power resistors normally are hot to the touch. There is nothing wrong with using larger resistors if your goal is to reduce any discomfort you have in working with them or coming into contact with them. But it not required. There is not enough power to cause any fire hazard or burn. You can always use a series string of resistors to spread out the heat. Example: you could use 3 1/2W 39Ohm resistors in series. That will give you a long 117 ohm 1.5W resistor. The resistance accuracy is not the critical. --- In WiringForDCC@..., "beckemeier53221"Best Regards, Mark Gurries Linear Technology Power Supply & Battery Charger Applications Engineer/Manager --------------------------------------------------------- Model Railroad Club and NMRA DCC presentations are at: -------------------------------------------------------- Audio Enthusiast (Love SAE equipment) ---------------------------------------------------------- |
Re: Reversing section advice
Vollrath, Don
Blair, One more thought.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
If some of your track is hidden, it one more reason for making track polarity reversals and switch controls occur automatically. For example: a train exiting out of loop L should automatically throw SW2 as it approaches the exit...and correct the track polarity of L to match. If you can't see the train, it will be difficult if not impossible to throw toggle switches manually to do the job. There is an example of how to do this using an auto-reverser and relay at DonV -----Original Message-----
From: WiringForDCC@... [mailto:WiringForDCC@...]On Behalf Of Rasa and Blair Smith Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 7:28 PM To: WiringForDCC@... Subject: RE: [WiringForDCC] Reversing section advice <U said> The flawless performance of this hidden trackage is important to me, as it will be central to the operation of both my main line and one of the two primary interchange railroads on my layout. |
Re: Thinking switches.......
Vollrath, Don
Reread Allan's ideas on DCC friendly switches at the link listed below. The bane of DCC is poor electrical connections and occasional short circuits can cause problems. Yes, you will want all rails energized.
I'm not familiar with Fleishmann-Profi products. I like Atlas cd 83 switches, but add wire bonding connections. The new DCC friendly switches from Walthers also look good as long as you add bonding wires and use an external microswitch to provide supplemental power to the frog. DonV |
Re: Reversing section advice
Vollrath, Don
Blair,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
My solutions 2 and 3 using relays do not have any real drawbacks. You simply add more insulating rail gaps in the appropriate places and wire up a DPDT relay(s) to control power to those sections of track. If you use Tortoise switch machines for turnout control this is simple to do. [Wire a 12Vdc relay coil in parallel with the Tortoise motor, but add a diode so that the relay coil gets energized with the tortoise in only one direction.] If you plan on using manual throws, add a DPDT toggle sw to do the same thing manually. Small electromechanical relays and toggle switch contacts change state in milliseconds. Any sound decoders on your locos won't even notice that track polarity has changed. Slide switches or 2 separate SPDT contact sets or microswitches or the contacts internal to a Tortoise may interrupt track power momentarily causing an annoying re-start of loco movement or sound. The advantage of using a relay is that the cost of relay or two is far less than any Auto-Reverser. Loy's ARSC is ~$80 USD. Solution 1 with the Loy's toys ARSC may not be totally workable as your own words indicate that track section Y space may be slightly too short. It needs to be longer than the active wheelbase of your longest loco consist PLUS about 2 more inches at each end for what L-T calls portals. Each of these need to be slightly longer than a 3 axle passenger truck, but no longer. See my short track reverser explanations in the files section of this forum. One other comment - For almost any A-R units, You may have difficulty starting up your DCC system if locos are bridging the isolating gaps at a reversing section of track. This occurs because the polarity detecting mechanism needs power to select the proper state and there is no power until the booster gets going. But if there is an instant track short on power up, the booster can't provide power to the relay or A-R unit for self correction...Catch 22. A manual toggle switch system, or one using a separate power source for relays can avoid this problem. A simple way is to simply avoid leaving locos bridging A-R rail gaps when you suspend operations. DonV -----Original Message-----
From: WiringForDCC@... [mailto:WiringForDCC@...]On Behalf Of Rasa and Blair Smith Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 7:28 PM To: WiringForDCC@... Subject: RE: [WiringForDCC] Reversing section advice Hello Don Thanks for the informative and very useful response; yes the explanations are excellent. As an electronics tech, everything makes sense. Your comments about relays (and switches) make me think that although that will accomplish what I want electrically, I will pay an unacceptable price in performance if the train is visible. Since the reversing section trackage in question is all staging, however, I wonder if I will even notice a stagger, if that is the only effect. Are there other drawbacks you can identify to solutions 2 and 3? Regardless, I am extremely interested in your offer of more data in solution number 1, as my section Y is only longer by about one inch than my longest conceived locomotive consist; the power on my longest lighted passenger train would be shorter, but some of the long freights will likely be 4 SD40-2 units, which fit with an inch to spare. The flawless performance of this hidden trackage is important to me, as it will be central to the operation of both my main line and one of the two primary interchange railroads on my layout. Regards Blair Smith |
Re: Terminating bus ends
Ken
--- In WiringForDCC@..., "beckemeier53221"
<MBeckemeier@w...> wrote: Thanks for the info Mike. I had already decided to use a 2 watt, now I'll probably go with the 3 as you used. Thanks for the info. Ken I can attest to the resistors getting toasty. I had to installover 90 of them on our club layout. Even the 1 watt resistor got quite hot.to the touch.C317C104M5U5CA. Resistor:5093NW130R0J
|
Re: Terminating bus ends
Ken
--- In WiringForDCC@..., "beckemeier53221"
<MBeckemeier@w...> wrote: Thanks for the info Mike. I had already decided to use a 2 watt, now I'll probably go with the 3 as you used. Thanks for the info. Ken I can attest to the resistors getting toasty. I had to installover 90 of them on our club layout. Even the 1 watt resistor got quite hot.to the touch.C317C104M5U5CA. Resistor:5093NW130R0J
|
Re: Terminating bus ends
Regarding the values of the Resistor and Capacitor:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I can attest to the resistors getting toasty. I had to install over 90 of them on our club layout. Even the 1 watt resistor got quite hot. I eventually went with a 3 watt 130 ohm resistor and a 0.1uf 50 V Capacitor. It really cleaned up the signal nice, and is not as hot to the touch. Capacitor: Newark Part Number: 08B5602 Manufacturer Part Number: C317C104M5U5CA. Resistor: Newark Part Number: 94C3740 Manufacturer Part Number : 5093NW130R0J Mike Beckemeier If you wire your layout with the |
Re: Reversing section advice
Hello Don
Thanks for the informative and very useful response; yes the explanations are excellent. As an electronics tech, everything makes sense. Your comments about relays (and switches) make me think that although that will accomplish what I want electrically, I will pay an unacceptable price in performance if the train is visible. Since the reversing section trackage in question is all staging, however, I wonder if I will even notice a stagger, if that is the only effect. Are there other drawbacks you can identify to solutions 2 and 3? Regardless, I am extremely interested in your offer of more data in solution number 1, as my section Y is only longer by about one inch than my longest conceived locomotive consist; the power on my longest lighted passenger train would be shorter, but some of the long freights will likely be 4 SD40-2 units, which fit with an inch to spare. The flawless performance of this hidden trackage is important to me, as it will be central to the operation of both my main line and one of the two primary interchange railroads on my layout. Regards Blair Smith |
Re: Terminating bus ends
Vollrath, Don
No offense taken and I agree. As originally stated it could be misinterpreted by someone who is trying to follow the directions written by someone else word for word. But then, I didn't write that. There is a learning opportunity here for everyone. Re-read what you print very carefully before you hit the send button. Try to understand how or why someone else might be confused by the wording you have chosen. Always write your questions and answers to be crystal clear. And for you readers...If there is something that seems confusing...Ask.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: WiringForDCC@... [mailto:WiringForDCC@...]On Behalf Of Ken Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 1:49 PM To: WiringForDCC@... Subject: [WiringForDCC] Re: Terminating bus ends Don, please don't take offense as I'm really not trying to be flip here or play on semantics, but if the wording had indeed said one per bus, I wouldn't have asked the question I did. But the wording says "Yes, you will need two of these circuits for each bus - one at each end." To me, the key words are "two", "each" and "each" & that means if I have one bus, it is a bus with two ends and the ends are dangling and booster, and the wording states emphatically that each bus requires two, not one. So to me, that means put one at the dangling end and another at the booster end just like the wording said. And since, with my limited DCC and electronic knowledge, it just didn't sound right, it is why I posed my question. But, I do thank you for the clarification. I really do appreciate your taking the time to explain to a novice like myself. Ken --- In WiringForDCC@..., "Vollrath, Don" <dvollrath@m...> wrote: hose, how many nozzles would you need? :-) each DCC bus run at the end opposite from the booster." Do not put a terminator at the booster. If you wire your layout with the booster near the center and multiple DCC buses fanning out like a star, put an R/C terminator at the far end of each bus. it is non-polarized. Any 50V or higher mylar, ceramic, polycarbonate, polystyrene or paper film type will all work OK. However, do NOT use an electrolytic or tantalum type as they are not rated for this type of duty and are very likely to be polarized. For HO scale a 0.1 MFD capacitance value of just about any (+/-1, 2, 5, 10, or 20%) tolerance will work. And yes, do use a 100-150 ohm, 1 watt rated resistor. A 1/2 watt resistor will work, but it will get hot...which reduces the lifetime.
Yahoo! Groups Links |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss