Comparing my Bonich'72 starting data with the above I can see only one difference. My data has three digits past the decimal and your data is rounded to off to two digits past the decimal. Could that be the difference? I have repeated this twice. I also checked the original Davis data which were downloaded along with Matrix 2.3 (Borgatti, et al, 2018). Very strange. I am using UCINET ver. 6.742.? The important point is to find the best correlation score with the original which is the point I needed to know. It is interesting to me how the Z-scores and frequencies respond.Thank you again.
