开云体育

Hi, I am using Windows 11 and Ucinet runs. Best Regards, Lara Bertola Sent: 17 May 2022 16:53 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ucinet] windows 11 Thanks Paulo and Andrea. Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022

Thanks Paulo and Andrea. Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 09:53 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ucinet] windows 11 Dear Steve, I am using Windows 11 on daily basis and I confirm that Ucinet runs

Dear Steve, I am using Windows 11 on daily basis and I confirm that Ucinet runs smoothly on this system. Best Andrea Salvini Inviato da Posta per Windows Da: Steve Borgatti Inviato: martedì 17 maggio

Hi, until now ucinet worked without problems in w11. (-: Obter o Outlook para Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 10:49:01 AM To:

Hi, a potential customer wants to know if UCINET runs on Windows 11. I assume it does, but don't have a Windows 11 machine to confirm. Any of you running UCINET on Windows 11? thanks steve Stephen P.

Hi Martin, Thanks! May I ask two more questions about the UCINET functions? 1. What’s the difference between metric and non-metric MDS? Can I assume that the former is for valued networks and the

Hi I vaguely recall an error in the Davis data that was corrected and this could cause the change. Also we do update and improve routines and correct bugs and these too could make a difference. Martin

Hi Martin, Thanks! That’s really helpful. I tried the dual-projection method, following the steps mentioned in the document. There are indeed 5 core events now. But the women-by-women partition

Hi Dual core periphery in UCINET uses the categorical method whereas xUCINET uses the dual projection which is a continuous method. The later and usually better method is the dual projection. This can

Dear all, I’ve used UCINET to run Davis_SouthernWomen data, using 2-mode categorical core-periphery. As the attached output shows, the core events are 7, 8, and 9. But these results seem different

Sure. Suppose I construct the woman-woman 1-mode projection from the davis data, accepting the default output name of davisrows. Now, I run network|subgroup|fgroups on davisrows:

Hi, there is a bug. You can fix the problem by installing the "blockmodeling" package before installing the xUCINET package. In R Studio, use the install.packages function as follows: Then following

Dear all, I’ve tried to install xUCINET on RStudio, but failed. I followed the steps as suggested here: https://www.analyzingsocialnetworksusingr.com/xucinet. The error message is: ERROR: dependency

Is there a way to also dichotomize in UCINET via g-transitivity?

So far dichotomizing and exporting has worked fine, at least for 115 and 133 symmetric datasets I've tried and that includes success with finding triads and tetrads although that will take some time

Comparing my Bonich'72 starting data with the above I can see only one difference. My data has three digits past the decimal and your data is rounded to off to two digits past the decimal. Could that

Actually, I think I might have mixed up the cutoff with the correlation. But, btw, the numbers you are showing look slightly different from mine. A problem with the sorting? steve

1. I cannot still am not sure about the 0.816 value and although that is a good correlation, there are higher values. 2. Thank you Nelson, but I do not do network analysis on a consistent basis every

Hi Scott, I use UCINet for many network analysis, but for motif counting, characterizing and modelling I prefer working in R (i.e., igraph). Best of luck. Nelson Jatel, Doctoral Candidate Nelson R.

Thank you. Actually this approach to dichotomizing is forcing me to reassess my method which was assigning 1 to mean +/- 1SD and all else a zero with the recognition that low degree individuals are