开云体育

We had to do that here at the University of Illinois, too. Back in the early 70's we were doing some ionospheric propagation studies along with the University of Houston. We flew two cesium clocks to

Back 'in-the-day' I had to carry (transport) the 'flying clock' from Northwest to White-House (no not that wh house) to establish the exact 'phase' error for the ROTHR (Relocatable Over The Horizon

Early tinySA firmware was not very good at avoiding compression with strong input signals It is easy to check for compression Switch to manual attenuator mode and increase attenuation above the auto

I'm building a 1kW+ HF power amplifier.? I've a 2kW homebrew dummy-load with a 60dB PAD (measured with a nanoVNA it's around 60db flat to 100MHz). With an IC7300 at 100% FM, 7.2MHz, the tinySA reads

Which is why I wrote it as "milliHertz". MilliHertz just would not be right. :) "W0LEV via groups.io" <davearea51a@...> wrote: -- 73 -Jim NU0C

Yes. mHz is needed to "compete" in the FMTs. However, we should use correct abbreviations for the units. Having once been professionally involved in precision timekeeping in the early days of GPS,

We all like to poke fun about this but if you ever participate in the FMT you actually do need milliHertz precision to get into the "green box". "W0LEV via groups.io"

200Mc/min would be much neater than 3.3333333333(ad nauseam) Mc/s though:-) Cheers...Bob VK2ZRE

Dog gone it, you are right.? It could be 200 Mega cycles per minute.? Mea Culpa.

Thanks Herb, That works! [email protected]> wrote:

You can use the "trace {# } value" console command to retrieve the values for each trace. For example, "trace 2 value" will return 450 values for trace 2 in dBm if the default units are dBm for the

And mmF (micki-micki-imikes) and mF (micki-mikes) and cps (cycles per second)........ Dave - W?LEV [email protected]> wrote: -- *Dave - W?LEV*

Isn't it 200 Mc/s ? Mike N2MS

It is not difficult to build your own. I have built a number of loopstick antennas using ferrite rods. I chose the Amidon Associates R33-050-750 rods. https://www.amidoncorp.com/r33-050-750/ I

Dave, are you sure that isn't 200 Mc ?? ;)?? What's this Hertz stuff ?

Is there a way to collect the data from multiple displayed traces? I can collect the first trace with "data 2". I don't see how to collect the others.

QUOTE: 200 mhz. 200 milliHertz? That's the realm of earthquakes and subsonics! Possibly you mean 200 MHz, MegaHertz. Dave - W?LEV [email protected]> wrote: -- *Dave - W?LEV*

I have used both the TinySA and the Ultra at 90 kHz. I believe I have also used both to receive WWVB at 60 kHz. Zack W9SZ [email protected]>

Because antennas with showing that frequency was suggested, and no one corrected that person, so I assumed those antennas could be used.

I bought the moxon v2 915mhz, it's no better than the antenna that is included. I bought the video aerial systems antenna just for fun, and it's actually way better, but still very little under 200