Back 'in-the-day' I had to carry (transport) the 'flying clock'
from Northwest to White-House (no not that wh house) to establish
the exact 'phase' error for the ROTHR (Relocatable Over The
Horizon Radar). Why? Yeah, that's another kettle of fish to
digest. Bottom line, it had to do with the 'error' distance
between the transmitter site at wh-house and our receiver site at
NW. If you stuck your periscope out of the water 1000+ miles away
and were traveling just over 5mph, (knots) well let's just say you
now became a 'target' of interest. Yeah, Dave, then came GPS and
the gee-dunk trips were over.
Mike C. Sand Mtn GA
On 10/5/2024 12:48 PM, W0LEV wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Yes.?
mHz is needed to "compete" in the FMTs.? However, we should
use correct abbreviations for the units.?
Having
once been professionally involved in precision timekeeping in
the early days of GPS, I well appreciate error bars in the
10^-14 Hz (in the lab, only).? Of course, once on orbit, we
had to correct for relativity.? Now we take GPS for granted.?
Dave
- W?LEV
Dave
- W?LEV
We all like to poke fun about this but if you ever participate
in the FMT you actually do need milliHertz precision to get
into the "green box".
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:12:53 +0000
"W0LEV via "
<davearea51a=[email protected]>
wrote:
> QUOTE:? 200 mhz.
>
> 200 milliHertz?? That's the realm of earthquakes and
subsonics!? Possibly
> you mean 200 MHz, MegaHertz.
>
> Dave - W?LEV
--
73
-Jim
NU0C
--