200Mc/min would be much neater than 3.3333333333(ad nauseam) Mc/s
though:-)
Cheers...Bob VK2ZRE
On 5/10/2024 4:27 am, rich wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Dog gone it, you are right.? It could be 200 Mega cycles per
minute.? Mea Culpa. ??
On 10/4/24 1:43 PM, Mike N2MS via
groups.io wrote:
Isn't
it 200 Mc/s ?
?