Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
A repeater is ONLY a repeater when it is repeating...otherwise it is a amateur station falling under other rules...this is why a REPEATER in Autopatch mode is NOT a repeater but a full duplex base
By
Chris Boone WB5ITT
·
#215478
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Thats an easy one. PI 5 for the win.
By
Kory Oldham W4RZ
·
#215477
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
What about a Pi? Which is better, the 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5? Mick - W7CAT
By
Teton Amateur Radio Repeater Association (TARRA)
·
#215476
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Beacon: Part 97 - Page 5 - section 9 defines "Beacon" as: An amateur station transmitting communications for the purposes of observation of propagation and reception or other related experimental
By
digitalradiohacker
·
#215475
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Chris, Page 8 section 47of Part 97 defines "Third party communications" as: A message from the control operator (first party) of an amateur station to another amateur station control operator (second
By
digitalradiohacker
·
#215474
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
hahahahaha
By
Kory Oldham W4RZ
·
#215473
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
For giggles, I had to see what ChatGPT had to say about it (I'm certainly not calling this a qualified source and I've caught ChatGPT in errors before). In the United States, beaconing an ID on an
By
Ken Arck AH6LE
·
#215472
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
No it is not. It is a licensed repeater, identifying per regulations. Just because you don¡¯t agree changes nothing. If ALL it did was identify, without ever passing other traffic you would be
By
Tom Cole
·
#215471
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Can we discuss PC vs MAC next?
By
Ken Arck AH6LE
·
#215470
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
[email protected]> wrote: ? ? ? Tom you need to read part 97 and take your license test again... the only time the repeaters required to ID is when it's in use!
By
Chris Boone WB5ITT
·
#215469
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
No it's not allowed....ask Riley or Laura Smith.. When a station is not repeating another station, it falls under other rules. This is the same thing as when it's in Auto patch mode, it's no longer a
By
Chris Boone WB5ITT
·
#215468
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
That was my point. It is not prohibited, so therefore is allowed. In fact, one could ID every 5 minutes and be legal.
By
Tom Cole
·
#215467
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
I wonder if someone can walk me through this? I'm based in the UK, and our rules are ging to be different. For example, the only rule that I think would apply here is "unattended operation". For
By
digitalradiohacker
·
#215466
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit, attempt #2
The SLR does...via the GPIO pins..I opened an archive I have for a SLR8000 and set GPIO 2 to low going, debounce and TX PL Inhibit....it should work once written into the cpg..I don't have a SLR8000
By
Chris Boone WB5ITT
·
#215465
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit, attempt #2
Chris Does the SLR allow external logic control of encoded tone? I know the Quantar does but have no idea about the SLR. Ken
By
Ken Arck AH6LE
·
#215464
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit, attempt #2
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 02:00 PM, Chris Boone WB5ITT wrote: > > Mike I'm not sure why you did all that. I don't understand what you're > trying to do. The SLR 8000 will not send PL during the IDs if
By
Mike Sullivan
·
#215463
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit, attempt #2
Mike I'm not sure why you did all that. I don't understand what you're trying to do. The SLR 8000 will not send PL during the IDs if you have the correct checkbox marked. I guess it's because you're
By
Chris Boone WB5ITT
·
#215462
·
|
RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit, attempt #2
Going to try this again since my other topic was hijacked and turned into a cryfest over ID's.. So, again, RC-210 to a SLR-8000 no TS64. Everything works great, but I am attempting to set up the
By
Mike Sullivan
·
#215461
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Hello Jeff, Any plans for the holiday? Just wondering if you would like to go pound sand with me? By the way Tom, you forgot to give your call sign like us respectable hams do! Mick - W7CAT
By
Teton Amateur Radio Repeater Association (TARRA)
·
#215460
·
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
"There isn't anything in the rules that says you are supposed to transmit every ten minutes that a repeater is available" There probably isn't anything in the rules about me wearing a red t-shirt, but
By
digitalradiohacker
·
#215459
·
|