¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: upgrade cdm 750 dash to 1250 remote
i just changed a cdm 750 4 channel to 36 channel for testing haven't got much further but planning to put it in 6 meters. i used chirp to do this works ok for both control head swap and band change.
By dewey jones · #215492 ·
Tait TM-8105 UHF AllStarLink Ready Repeaters -- Memorial Day Sale
Memorial Day Sale - $100 Off 40 Watt UHF 70CM Watt AllStarLink Repeaters including Raspberry Pi computer, Sound Interface, and 2 Tait Radios, ready to go and link to the AllStar Network!
By Skyler Fennell · #215491 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Honto da na! Burt, K60QK
By Burt K6OQK · #215490 ·
upgrade cdm 750 dash to 1250 remote
Is this possible to do? It's a low band d split 25 to 40 w.
By Part 15 Engineer · #215489 ·
Re: ID intervals (was: [repeater-builder] RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit)
The FCC has said no several times to that but I guess he's not listening [email protected]> wrote:
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215488 ·
ID intervals (was: [repeater-builder] RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit)
At 5/23/2025 01:48 PM, you wrote: That was my point. It is not prohibited, so therefore is allowed. In fact, one could ID every 5 minutes and be legal. Really? OK then, how about every 3 minutes? 2
By Bob Dengler · #215487 ·
M1225LS Radio Password Bypass
I have 2 UJF M1225 LS radios that have passwords that previous owners don't have available. I once heard there was a bypass password for these radios. Is that true?
By jim_everson · #215486 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
like you pointing out the errors of my ways so I'll ignore you". Nice attitude, especially in amateur radio where we are supposed to be self-policing. Clearly you can't even police yourself. I was
By Bob Dengler · #215485 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
At 5/22/2025 07:55 PM, you wrote: On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:47 PM, Chris Boone WB5ITT wrote: Uhhh beacon IDing, etc is illegal under part97..several repeaters have gotten emails from Riley about it.
By Bob Dengler · #215484 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
I like em round myself (TARRA) via groups.io <tarra@...> wrote:
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215483 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
What is your callsign?? You seem to hiding something...as to Beacons, any amateur station keying up periodically and transmitting information (ID, TIME< Telemetry, etc) is a BEACON..GO ask Laura Smith
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215482 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Excuse me BUT what do you call an autopatch or a manual phone patch on HF? How about letting a non amateur talk on your station? THATS 3RD Party... IT has been for decades.....You didn't look deep
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215481 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
What about Linux???? [email protected]> wrote:
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215480 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Ken, you forgot the important part WHEN a repeater is beaconing ID every 10min, hour, whatever, since it is NOT in the AUTO BEACON subband, it MUST be monitored by a CONTROL OP as required by Part 97
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215479 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
A repeater is ONLY a repeater when it is repeating...otherwise it is a amateur station falling under other rules...this is why a REPEATER in Autopatch mode is NOT a repeater but a full duplex base
By Chris Boone WB5ITT · #215478 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Thats an easy one. PI 5 for the win.
By Kory Oldham W4RZ · #215477 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
What about a Pi? Which is better, the 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5? Mick - W7CAT
By Teton Amateur Radio Repeater Association (TARRA) · #215476 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Beacon: Part 97 - Page 5 - section 9 defines "Beacon" as: An amateur station transmitting communications for the purposes of observation of propagation and reception or other related experimental
By digitalradiohacker · #215475 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Chris, Page 8 section 47of Part 97 defines "Third party communications" as: A message from the control operator (first party) of an amateur station to another amateur station control operator (second
By digitalradiohacker · #215474 ·
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
hahahahaha
By Kory Oldham W4RZ · #215473 ·