¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
Dan, I knew a Motorola (or Harris) solution was probably going to be the result of my query. L.M.A.O. I've heard your "sales pitch" before, having sat through similar sales and engineering briefings,
By David McGough · #183864 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
Most of us on this list are advanced to expert level in repeater design, installation, acceptance testing, performance verification, operation and site environmental considerations. Although you
By tony dinkel <td47@...> · #183863 ·
Re: Help identifying external interference source to our repeater
Hi John, I noticed you are centering in on the repeater's input. I doubt that's the strongest frequency (that would be like winning the reverse lottery). Look around elsewhere. and probably, you may
By wj9jrg · #183862 ·
Re: Help identifying external interference source to our repeater
Hi John, I listened to the audio and noticed a few things. Each pulse is fast rise/fast fall, 2 or 3 strengths, random, but in spread clusters. Almost like static discharge. Area of coverage suggests
By Frank Perkins · #183861 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
I would agree with that. Environmental noise is almost always above top quality high performance receiver noise floors, so therefore your definition of desense would be occurring, even on a receive
By Skyler Fennell · #183860 ·
Re: Port-A-Peater M100A Documentation
Gale, A friend of mine had one of these early "repeater controllers" that was intended to take two mobile radios (of that era) and make a portable repeater for emergency use.? As I recall, it's a
By Kevin Custer · #183859 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
I accept your apology and look forward to properly educating by using facts backed up by solid engineering.? We all have opinions, but not many of us have the ability to write in a manner that's
By Kevin Custer · #183857 ·
Port-A-Peater M100A Documentation
I'm looking for a copy of the documentation that came with a device called Port-A-Peater, built by a company called W-S Engineering located in Pine Hill, NJ.? A quality control tag on the inside of
By Gale Sorum · #183856 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
I started this thread and as a relative noob in this area I have appreciated the discourse as to grades of repeaters and some of the issues that come up more often in some than others. Different
By Eric Fort · #183855 ·
Re: Motorola service monitor R2001D
I haven't found a way to edit a post. The 2007 Allied catalog lists the series 251 as a diameter of 0.095. Lead diameter 1/16 to 10A 0.025 and 12 to 15A 0.032 The current series 251 are fatter.than to
By Steve K7LZJ · #183854 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
On my previous post before that I mentioned both environmental / site noise and transmitter noise. I was corrected by David McGough that desense is only defined as degradation due to your transmitter,
By Skyler Fennell · #183852 ·
Re: Help identifying external interference source to our repeater
John, A few questions: 1) Do you have an attenuator to put between the antenna of the 2nd video and the receiver? This would allow you to narrow the directivity of the source. 2) Have you explored the
By David McBrayer <d_mcbrayer@...> · #183849 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
Mr. Woodie, Your initial statement about desense was " EVERY repeater has some level of desense, even with the best hardware and duplexers.? It is unavoidable as any high-powered transmission will
By Kevin Custer · #183848 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
I eagerly await an actual technical conversation. How does a GTR8000 outperform other repeaters? Something more than ¡°better components.¡± Do you have spectrum analyzer plots you can share showing
By Matt Wagner · #183847 ·
Re: Motorola service monitor R2001D
Clarification of my inclusion of 275 series NOS ONLY.? Low current only. Currently available 275 series are ONLY 20 to 30A and 32V rated.? Specified at 0.133" Old cut sheets for the 275 listed 2
By Steve K7LZJ · #183846 ·
FS: MSF5000 TLN2419A test set
I have a rarely used, still in plastic MSF5000 TLN2419A test set for sale. Includes: Test set Real manual Ribbon cable RJ45 cable Picture here https://ibb.co/L5rLzZx $100 shipped.? PayPal only. Email
By Jacob AD?JA · #183844 ·
Re: Help identifying external interference source to our repeater
Whatever it is, you will be surprised. You need to do a little more, especially in the DF area. The good news, compared to a human jammer, is that is is there all the time. Can you hear it on a
By K8TB · #183843 ·
Help identifying external interference source to our repeater
Hello all. I'm hoping someone can help me track down a new source of noise we're hearing on the input to our local 2m repeater at 147.990MHz. Here's a couple short videos of what it sounds like while
By john@... · #183840 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
I wonder if he knows of any good repeater controllers to use? ; ) Mick - W7CAT
By Teton Amateur Radio Repeater Association (TARRA) · #183838 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
As a Kenwood Dealer, we sell quite a few of the NXR series for Amateur use (as well as commercial of course). They work excellently in the Amateur service, are pretty much bullet proof and will
By Ken Arck AH6LE · #183837 ·