Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
No it's not allowed....ask Riley or Laura Smith..
When a station is not repeating another station, it falls under other rules. This is the same thing as when it's in Auto patch mode, it's no longer a repeater, it's a station carrying third-party traffic and must follow third-party traffic rules. If it is beaconing it falls under the beacon rules! Automatic beaconing on two meters is restricted to 144.275 to 144.3. If you are automatically beaconing outside of that sub band, the rules require a control operator monitor the transmitter during its operation. Those are the rules! Like them or not they're in part 97.203
Chris WB5ITT?
That was my point. It is not prohibited, so therefore is allowed. In fact, one could ID every 5 minutes and be legal.? On May 23, 2025, at 12:18?PM, digitalradiohacker via <digitalradiohacker=[email protected]> wrote:
? "There isn't anything in the rules that says you are supposed to transmit every ten minutes that a repeater is available"
There probably isn't anything in the rules about me wearing a red t-shirt, but I'm doing it anyway.
If something isn't prohibited, it is allowed.
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
That was my point. It is not prohibited, so therefore is allowed. In fact, one could ID every 5 minutes and be legal.?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On May 23, 2025, at 12:18?PM, digitalradiohacker via groups.io <digitalradiohacker@...> wrote:
? "There isn't anything in the rules that says you are supposed to transmit every ten minutes that a repeater is available"
There probably isn't anything in the rules about me wearing a red t-shirt, but I'm doing it anyway.
If something isn't prohibited, it is allowed.
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
I wonder if someone can walk me through this?
I'm based in the UK, and our rules are ging to be different. For example, the only rule that I think would apply here is "unattended operation". For remote (unattended) operation, an amateur must hold the top class of license (simply called "full license"). There are some requirements for being able to knockdown the system etc, but other than that, we can pretty much do as we like. Grandfather clock? Fine. Hourly or minute by minute repeater announcement? Go ahead.
So far, a lot of people have stated that this is "illegal", but no one has posted the chapter and verse that specifically prohibits it, and perhaps this is where the source of the argument is.
If someone could post exactly what they are looking at, and it turned out to be right, there would be no argument surely?
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit, attempt #2
The SLR does...via the GPIO pins..I opened an archive I have for a SLR8000 and set GPIO 2 to low going, debounce and TX PL Inhibit....it should work once written into the cpg..I don't have a SLR8000 lying around to test it though
Thats why I asked him to send me his CTB file so I can look at it
Chris
Chris
Does the SLR allow external logic control of encoded tone? I know the
Quantar does but have no idea about the SLR.
Ken
At 11:00 AM 5/23/2025, you wrote:
Mike I'm not sure why you did
all that. I don't understand what you're trying to do. The SLR 8000 will
not send PL during the IDs if you have the correct checkbox marked. I
guess it's because you're using an external controller. Are you having
the RC 210 do that, send the IDs? Why don't you post your code plug and
I'll take a look at it.
Chris WB5ITT?
On Fri, May 23, 2025, 12:55?€?PM Mike Sullivan via
<Kn4imu=[email protected]
> wrote:
- Going to try this again since my other topic was hijacked and turned
into a cryfest over ID's..
- So, again, RC-210 to a SLR-8000 no TS64. Everything works great, but
I am attempting to set up the repeater so that the CW ID does not send PL
Tone. (This is our choice, do not start your crying about ID in here)
This is how our old config (VXR-7000 with TS64) was set up. Nothing has
changed regarding controller programming yet.
- My thinking was tying the CTCSS Control pin to GPIO and enabled Tx PL
Inhibit would do this just fine. However when I have Tx PL Inhibit
programed in, whether set for Active High or Active Low, it strips PL
constantly. Is there something I am missing regarding the CTCSS Control
output or the way the Tx PL Inhibit function works? Or is there something
silly I'm missing on the RC-210 to change the CTCSS Control
functionality?
- (Please, for the love of god, keep the ID fight out of here)
- Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
President and CTO - Arcom Controllers
Makers of repeater controllers and accessories
Phone: (503) 678 6182
Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave.
We offer complete turn-key repeater packages!
"We don't just make 'em. We use 'em!"
![[]](http://www.arcomcontrollers.com/arcom.png)
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit, attempt #2
Chris
Does the SLR allow external logic control of encoded tone? I know the
Quantar does but have no idea about the SLR.
Ken
At 11:00 AM 5/23/2025, you wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Mike I'm not sure why you did
all that. I don't understand what you're trying to do. The SLR 8000 will
not send PL during the IDs if you have the correct checkbox marked. I
guess it's because you're using an external controller. Are you having
the RC 210 do that, send the IDs? Why don't you post your code plug and
I'll take a look at it.
Chris WB5ITT?
On Fri, May 23, 2025, 12:55?€?PM Mike Sullivan via
<Kn4imu=[email protected]
> wrote:
- Going to try this again since my other topic was hijacked and turned
into a cryfest over ID's..
- So, again, RC-210 to a SLR-8000 no TS64. Everything works great, but
I am attempting to set up the repeater so that the CW ID does not send PL
Tone. (This is our choice, do not start your crying about ID in here)
This is how our old config (VXR-7000 with TS64) was set up. Nothing has
changed regarding controller programming yet.
- My thinking was tying the CTCSS Control pin to GPIO and enabled Tx PL
Inhibit would do this just fine. However when I have Tx PL Inhibit
programed in, whether set for Active High or Active Low, it strips PL
constantly. Is there something I am missing regarding the CTCSS Control
output or the way the Tx PL Inhibit function works? Or is there something
silly I'm missing on the RC-210 to change the CTCSS Control
functionality?
- (Please, for the love of god, keep the ID fight out of here)
- Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
President and CTO - Arcom Controllers
Makers of repeater controllers and accessories
Phone: (503) 678 6182
Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave.
We offer complete turn-key repeater packages!
"We don't just make 'em. We use 'em!"
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit, attempt #2
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 02:00 PM, Chris Boone WB5ITT wrote:
Mike I'm not sure why you did all that. I don't understand what you're trying to do. The SLR 8000 will not send PL during the IDs if you have the correct checkbox marked. I guess it's because you're using an external controller. Are you having the RC 210 do that, send the IDs? Why don't you post your code plug and I'll take a look at it.
?
Chris WB5ITT?
Going to try this again since my other topic was hijacked and turned into a cryfest over ID's..
So, again, RC-210 to a SLR-8000 no TS64. Everything works great, but I am attempting to set up the repeater so that the CW ID does not send PL Tone. (This is our choice, do not start your crying about ID in here) This is how our old config (VXR-7000 with TS64) was set up. Nothing has changed regarding controller programming yet.
My thinking was tying the CTCSS Control pin to GPIO and enabled Tx PL Inhibit would do this just fine. However when I have Tx PL Inhibit programed in, whether set for Active High or Active Low, it strips PL constantly. Is there something I am missing regarding the CTCSS Control output or the way the Tx PL Inhibit function works? Or is there something silly I'm missing on the RC-210 to change the CTCSS Control functionality?
(Please, for the love of god, keep the ID fight out of here)
Mike
Yes, the controller is handling it. We use CWID every 10 minutes and a voice ID at the top of the hour as a "grandfather clock". Would like to keep it that way. I know the repeater will strip it when in repeat mode, but we need the RC210 for interfacing to Allstar and remote base. Mike
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit, attempt #2
Mike I'm not sure why you did all that. I don't understand what you're trying to do. The SLR 8000 will not send PL during the IDs if you have the correct checkbox marked. I guess it's because you're using an external controller. Are you having the RC 210 do that, send the IDs? Why don't you post your code plug and I'll take a look at it.
Chris WB5ITT?
Going to try this again since my other topic was hijacked and turned into a cryfest over ID's..
So, again, RC-210 to a SLR-8000 no TS64. Everything works great, but I am attempting to set up the repeater so that the CW ID does not send PL Tone. (This is our choice, do not start your crying about ID in here) This is how our old config (VXR-7000 with TS64) was set up. Nothing has changed regarding controller programming yet.
My thinking was tying the CTCSS Control pin to GPIO and enabled Tx PL Inhibit would do this just fine. However when I have Tx PL Inhibit programed in, whether set for Active High or Active Low, it strips PL constantly. Is there something I am missing regarding the CTCSS Control output or the way the Tx PL Inhibit function works? Or is there something silly I'm missing on the RC-210 to change the CTCSS Control functionality?
(Please, for the love of god, keep the ID fight out of here)
Mike
|
RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit, attempt #2
Going to try this again since my other topic was hijacked and turned into a cryfest over ID's..
So, again, RC-210 to a SLR-8000 no TS64. Everything works great, but I am attempting to set up the repeater so that the CW ID does not send PL Tone. (This is our choice, do not start your crying about ID in here) This is how our old config (VXR-7000 with TS64) was set up. Nothing has changed regarding controller programming yet.
My thinking was tying the CTCSS Control pin to GPIO and enabled Tx PL Inhibit would do this just fine. However when I have Tx PL Inhibit programed in, whether set for Active High or Active Low, it strips PL constantly. Is there something I am missing regarding the CTCSS Control output or the way the Tx PL Inhibit function works? Or is there something silly I'm missing on the RC-210 to change the CTCSS Control functionality?
(Please, for the love of god, keep the ID fight out of here)
Mike
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Hello Jeff,
Any plans for the holiday? Just wondering if you would like to go pound sand with me?
By the way Tom, you forgot to give your call sign like us respectable hams do!
Mick - W7CAT
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Cole" To: [email protected]Sent: Friday, May 23, 2025 10:50:58 AM Subject: Re: [repeater-builder] RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
On May 23, 2025, at 10:33?AM, Teton Amateur Radio Repeater
Association (TARRA) wrote:
?
Have you ever read Part 97? Do you know what it is about?
¡ì 97.119 Station identification.
(a) Each amateur station, except a space station or telecommand
station, must transmit its assigned call sign on its transmitting channel at the end of each communication, and at least every 10 minutes during a communication
There isn't anything in the rules that says you are supposed to
transmit every ten minutes that a repeater is available.
There is also nothing that says you can¡¯t. Now go pound sand with
your buddy Jeff.
-- Untitled Document
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
"There isn't anything in the rules that says you are supposed to transmit every ten minutes that a repeater is available"
There probably isn't anything in the rules about me wearing a red t-shirt, but I'm doing it anyway.
If something isn't prohibited, it is allowed.
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
On May 23, 2025, at 10:33?AM, Teton Amateur Radio Repeater Association (TARRA) <tarra@...> wrote:
?
Have you ever read Part 97? Do you know what it is about?
¡ì 97.119 Station identification.
(a) Each amateur station, except a space station or telecommand station, must transmit its assigned call sign on its transmitting channel at the end of each communication, and at least every 10 minutes during a communication
There isn't anything in the rules that says you are supposed to transmit every ten minutes that a repeater is available.
There is also nothing that says you can¡¯t. Now go pound sand with your buddy Jeff.
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Have you ever read Part 97? Do you know what it is about?
¡ì 97.119 Station identification.
(a) Each amateur station, except a space station or telecommand station, must transmit its assigned call sign on its transmitting channel at the end of each communication, and at least every 10 minutes during a communication
There isn't anything in the rules that says you are supposed to transmit every ten minutes that a repeater is available.
"We¡¯ve been running our repeaters for well over 40 years this way." Maybe they have been "grandmothered in".
Since you are doing everything proper and legal, then there is nothing to worry about with giving your call sign (do you have one?). And the call signs for these legal repeaters.
Maybe all of us should turn on our "email CTCSS decoders" and then we won't see him again!
Mick - W7CAT
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Cole" To: [email protected]Sent: Friday, May 23, 2025 08:11:41 AM Subject: Re: [repeater-builder] RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Transmitting your ID is not the same as beaconing. I said I was going back the original subject of DMR beacons. I
wasn't talking about ID's.
Clearly you were.
Until then, go pound sand. Rephrasing: "I don't like you pointing out the errors of my ways so
I'll ignore you". Nice attitude, especially in amateur radio where we are supposed to be self-policing. Clearly you can't even police yourself.
I was quite clear. YOUR INTERPRETATION of the rules are irrelevant.
We¡¯ve been running our repeaters for well over 40 years this way. If it were illegal, we would have gotten a notice in that time. Smarter people than you set our systems up initially. I trust THEIR judgement. We police ourselves quite well. You just don¡¯t like the fact that we don¡¯t take your comments as gospel. Have a blessed day Jeff.
-- Untitled Document
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Jeff,
Since you obviously think you must have the last word, go ahead. I¡¯m through dealing with your arrogance and stupidity. Have a blessed day.
|
Re: Using HF rig or 6M repeaters
Between ensuring they are using FM, best amplitude for mic gain, and when possible a vertical antenna - these things have greatly helped those doing this
Jason
Mike audio gain can be much different between SSB, AM and FM operation.
They may have to remember what the optimum setting for mike gain is for
each mode and reset the control.
73, Joe, K1ike
On 5/22/2025 9:26 PM, Chuck Kelsey via wrote:
> I have some potential users of my 6M FM repeater that want to use their
> HF rigs for that purpose. Unfortunately most that have tried have
> terrible audio - over driven and distorted. What do they need to pay
> attention to with their rigs? FWIW, I do not have an HF radio because I
> have zero interest, so I'm no help to them.
>
> Chuck
> WB2EDV
>
|
OT: Hytera MD652U DMR Radio
Hi Guys:
I am looking for the software and a programming cable for the Hytera MD652U DMR radio.
Appreciate any info!
Thanks,
Ramesh, VA3UV, WA3UV
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
I said I was going back the original subject of DMR beacons. I wasn't talking about ID's.
Clearly you were.
I quote myself: "Going back to the original discussion regarding DMR beaconing," Perhaps your problems understanding the rules is related to your inability to read what has been written very clearly. We¡¯ve been
running our repeaters for well over 40 years this way. If it were illegal, we would
have gotten a notice in that time. "I've been stealing toilet paper from the Walmart bathroom for 40 years and have never been caught so it must be legal." Smarter people than you set our systems up initially. Really? Who were they? I enjoy meeting people smarter than me and having intellectual discussions with them, it's a great way to learn new things. --- Jeff WN3A
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Transmitting your ID is not the same as beaconing. I said I was going back the original subject of DMR beacons. I wasn't talking about ID's.
Clearly you were.
Until then, go pound sand. Rephrasing: "I don't like you pointing out the errors of my ways so I'll ignore you". Nice attitude, especially in amateur radio where we are supposed to be self-policing. Clearly you can't even police yourself.
I was quite clear. YOUR INTERPRETATION of the rules are irrelevant. We¡¯ve been running our repeaters for well over 40 years this way. If it were illegal, we would have gotten a notice in that time. Smarter people than you set our systems up initially. I trust THEIR judgement. We police ourselves quite well. You just don¡¯t like the fact that we don¡¯t take your comments as gospel. Have a blessed day Jeff.
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Not at all. Transmitting the repeater ID every 10 minutes is not only legal, but
required. It is required that you ID during and at the end of activity. It is not required that you identify every 10 minutes when there is no activity. In fact, it is not permitted. Transmitting an ID for no reason repeatedly is a one-way transmission. It is not permissible as evidenced by FCC warning letters over the years. There are several people *on this list* that have received such warnings, and no, I'm not going to rat them out. Your interpretation. Nope, fact. Your interpretation is that if you don't get caught doing something that's wrong that it's fine to do it. The purpose is that the FCC states we must ID every ten minutes. That's not what the rules say, read them again. Again, your interpretation. Why are you so concerned about your supposed ¡°RF
±è´Ç±ô±ô³Ü³Ù¾±´Ç²Ô¡±? Because you're not the only repeater in the planet on the channel. Even if your coordinator gives you something akin to geographic exclusivity on the channel doesn't mean there aren't distant users that can hear your pointless ID's, or even potentially interfere with their use or reception of another co-channel or adjacent-channel repeater if they are on the fringes. Transmitting your ID is not the same as beaconing. I said I was going back the original subject of DMR beacons. I wasn't talking about ID's. Until then, go pound sand. Rephrasing: "I don't like you pointing out the errors of my ways so I'll ignore you". Nice attitude, especially in amateur radio where we are supposed to be self-policing. Clearly you can't even police yourself. You have the shoplifter's attitude of "as long as I don't get caught I may as well keep doing it." --- Jeff WN3A
|
Re: RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
Even if it was legal to id every ten minutes, I wouldn't monitor
a repeater that did that. Just no need for that.
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr
wa0vjr@...
irlp 7135
allstar 56023
echolink 790800
new home phone 785 852-1102
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: "John S via groups.io" <johns@...> To: < [email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2025 7:33 AM Subject: Re: [repeater-builder] RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit I would have used a different term other than ignorant. On 2025-05-23 00:32, Teton Amateur Radio Repeater Association (TARRA) wrote: Can't argue with the ignorant!
Mick - W7CAT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Cole"
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 09:48:35 PM
Subject: Re: [repeater-builder] RC-210 and SLR-8000 PL Inhibit
So, you are going to monitor the frequency 24/7 and testify
that
something didn¡¯t key the repeater to trigger the ID? Of course
you
aren¡¯t. The FCC requires we ID every 10 minutes when the
repeater is
in use. It is in use from 0600 until 2359. The only way the
FCC would
even check on when a repeater IDs is if a sad ham complains.
Don¡¯t be
that Sad Ham.
|
Re: Using HF rig or 6M repeaters
Mike audio gain can be much different between SSB, AM and FM operation. They may have to remember what the optimum setting for mike gain is for each mode and reset the control.
73, Joe, K1ike
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 5/22/2025 9:26 PM, Chuck Kelsey via groups.io wrote: I have some potential users of my 6M FM repeater that want to use their HF rigs for that purpose. Unfortunately most that have tried have terrible audio - over driven and distorted. What do they need to pay attention to with their rigs? FWIW, I do not have an HF radio because I have zero interest, so I'm no help to them.
Chuck
WB2EDV
|
Chris Boone WB5ITT
digitalradiohacker
Ken Arck AH6LE