¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Logbook Profiles

 

I would think you should be able to create different?station profiles for each callsign.? Then select it when using those conditions.? You can create user filters to filter the log by callsign as well.

image.png

Michael, AA5SH

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 1:29?PM Dave, G8FXM via <webmaster=[email protected]> wrote:
I have a few different callsigns (RSL's), is it possible to segregate logs dependant on callsign used similar the the profile feature of CQRLog or log into different SQL databases/tables?
--
73'd de Dave, G8FXM


Logbook Profiles

 

I have a few different callsigns (RSL's), is it possible to segregate logs dependant on callsign used similar the the profile feature of CQRLog or log into different SQL databases/tables?
--
73'd de Dave, G8FXM


Re: #featurerequest #featurerequest

 

It is the simplest change in the upcoming release.

Regards
Ladislav

¨²t 20. 8. 2024 v?17:23 odes¨ªlatel WW4DX via <WW4DX=[email protected]> napsal:

WOW!!!


Re: #featurerequest #featurerequest

 

WOW!!!


Poll - Using Callbook's QTH information for Digi modes - last 3 day

 

Hello,

If you want to influence QLog, you have the last 3 days to accept or reject a feature request. The poll is open until 23/8, and the question is:

Should QLog use Callbook's QTH information and save it when using external QSO sources (WSJTX, FLDigi, etc.) when matching the callsign and partially matching the gridsquare (e.g., JN70 from QSO and JN70AA from the callbook)?

Github link .


Regards
Ladislav


Re: #featurerequest #featurerequest

 

OK. The next release will display the LP azimuth.

Regard
Ladislav

¨²t 20. 8. 2024 v?10:35 odes¨ªlatel WW4DX via <WW4DX=[email protected]> napsal:

You are correct.
?
Still using the manually activated Hy-Gain controller for the Tail Twister


Re: Multiple call signs in alert #featurerequest

 

Hi Wolfgang,
oh, did you mean using regex? Not very user friendly, but ok. I got it sorted. Thanks for pointing me.
--
___
Slav, EI6KW, SP3RXO


Re: #featurerequest #featurerequest

 

You are correct.
?
Still using the manually activated Hy-Gain controller for the Tail Twister


Re: Multiple call signs in alert #featurerequest

 

It is possible. You can find all information on this in the wiki.

?

Wolfgang, DL2KI


Multiple call signs in alert #featurerequest

 

Hi,
Is it possible to add multiple call signs to one alert? If not, it could be useful for award hunting, current dx expeditions hunting etc. etc.
--
___
Slav, EI6KW, SP3RXO


Re: #featurerequest #featurerequest

 

Hi,

only SP is displayed but Rotator Widget can rotate SP or LP. Based on the fact that you are asking, I conclude that you do not have a rotator connected via QLog. So the LP would be good to see, right?


ne 18. 8. 2024 v?17:08 odes¨ªlatel WW4DX via <WW4DX=[email protected]> napsal:

Amazing logging program!!!!
?
Any way to display the long path in the info screen?
?
?


#featurerequest #featurerequest

 

Amazing logging program!!!!
?
Any way to display the long path in the info screen?
?
?


Antenna Follows Band #featurerequest

 

Hi
?
In settings under the equipment section it is possible to enter antenna profiles. Thank you.
?
When entering contacts in the main window there is an option to select the antenna in use under the "My Station" tab.
?
My request is as follows:
?
Please provide an option (check box) to allow the antenna to follow the radio. Having a check box to "Opt In" will allow greater scope for operator efficiency.
?
To clarify:? When the radio is on 10m then the antenna in "My Station" automatically follows and reads the correct antenna from the "Antenna Profiles" section in setup. The same occurs when changing to any other band.
?
73
Adam VK4IM
?
?


Re: #featurerequest SWL and USERDEF fields options #featurerequest

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks Ladislav,

I'll take into account your advice of usign SIG and SIG_INFO fields.

Regards.

----

El 2/8/24 a las 11:04, ok1mlg via groups.io ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:

Thank you for your explanation.

For this case, it is more appropriate to use SIG and SIG_INFO. You don't think UserDefine fields should be part of QLog.

Regards
Ladislav

p¨¢ 2. 8. 2024 v?9:50 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:

Hi,

maybe USERDEFINED ADIF fields is a feature not much people use. I only suggested 'cos I use it but it maybe worthless and difficult to implement.

Next an edited example from a simple ADIF registry with USERDEFINED field:

<adif_ver:5>3.0.9

<USERDEF1:3:S>DME
<USERDEF2:3:S>DCE
<USERDEF3:4:S>DEFE
<USERDEF4:4:S>DMVE
<USERDEF5:4:S>DMUE
<USERDEF6:4:S>DVGE
<USERDEF7:3:S>DEE
<USERDEF8:4:S>EAFF
<eoh>

<qso_date:8:d>20240610 <time_on:6>195930 
<call:6>EA5XXX <band:2>6M <mode:3>FT8 <tx_pwr:3>100 
<rst_sent:3>+01 <rst_rcvd:3>+04 <time_off:6>200029 
<name:12>Name Example <qth:25>02320 Balazote (Albacete) 
<comment:25>FT8? Sent: +01? Rcvd: +04 
?
?<dxcc:3>281? <ituz:2>37? <cqz:2>14 ?
<pfx:3>EA5? <cont:2>EU? <freq:9>50.315441 ?
<gridsquare:4>IM88 ?
<notes:9>Notes ...

<qso_complete:1>? ?
? <lotw_qsl_sent:1>Y? <lotw_qsl_rcvd:1>N ?
<lotw_qslsdate:8>20240716? <lotw_qslrdate:8>20240716? ?

?<DME:5>02012 ?

<distance:5>00111 ?

<qrzcom_qso_upload_status:1>Y ?
<qrzcom_qso_upload_date:10>2024-06-10 ?
?
?<app_qrzlog_logid:10>1109247426 
<my_name_intl:25>V¨ªctor Jos¨¦ 'Vic' S¨¢nchez <my_city_intl:8>Albacete <my_postal_code_intl:5>02003 
<my_state:2>AB <my_cq_zone:2>14 <my_itu_zone:2>37 
<my_gridsquare:6>IM98bx <my_lat:11>N038 58.750 <my_lon:11>W001 52.500 <my_rig_intl:12>Yaesu FT-847 <station_callsign:6>EA4GRG <operator:6>EA4GRG 

<eor>

----

El 1/8/24 a las 16:26, ok1mlg via ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
Hi,

The SWL Check is not a problem. I don't see from your description how you use it, but I assume that the SWL check should be present in the QSO Detail Dialog, right?

On the other hand, I have a problem with the UserDefined field. Unfortunately, it is still not clear from your description how you use it. Also, keep in mind that UserDefined fields are not transferable between applications. So, I would be very careful with this one. I just want to know if something that is already used in ADIF (e.g. SIG field) can be used instead of UserDefined fields. That's why I would like you to describe an example of its usage.

Regards
Ladislav


st 31. 7. 2024 v?11:11 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:

Hi,

thanks for your answer and sorry if I misunderstanding

El 31/7/24 a las 11:00, ok1mlg via ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
HI,

It's not a problem to add something. But I have to know what and why it should be added. Unfortunately, it is not entirely clear from your description what and why you want to add.

SWL Check - Do you mean ADIF field "SWL"?

Yes. Sometimes I receive listener-only reports and it could be interesting.


USERDEF - Do you mean ADIF's USERDEF that are defined like ? Can you please describe what you use it for?
Yes. I usually use for some kind of awards to store extra information for easy searching.


Regards
Ladislav

Both are only suggestions.

Regards.


st 31. 7. 2024 v?10:39 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:
Hi all,

this is my first post in QLog mailing list. I've just trying it and it
looks very well. I'd like to ask for a couple of features to take into
account for future releases, if it was possible:

- SWL check (or whatever seemly) in a QSO info

- USERDEF fields support

Thanks in advance and congratulations for your work.







Re: #featurerequest SWL and USERDEF fields options #featurerequest

 

Thank you for your explanation.

For this case, it is more appropriate to use SIG and SIG_INFO. You don't think UserDefine fields should be part of QLog.

Regards
Ladislav

p¨¢ 2. 8. 2024 v?9:50 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:

Hi,

maybe USERDEFINED ADIF fields is a feature not much people use. I only suggested 'cos I use it but it maybe worthless and difficult to implement.

Next an edited example from a simple ADIF registry with USERDEFINED field:

<adif_ver:5>3.0.9

<USERDEF1:3:S>DME
<USERDEF2:3:S>DCE
<USERDEF3:4:S>DEFE
<USERDEF4:4:S>DMVE
<USERDEF5:4:S>DMUE
<USERDEF6:4:S>DVGE
<USERDEF7:3:S>DEE
<USERDEF8:4:S>EAFF
<eoh>

<qso_date:8:d>20240610 <time_on:6>195930 
<call:6>EA5XXX <band:2>6M <mode:3>FT8 <tx_pwr:3>100 
<rst_sent:3>+01 <rst_rcvd:3>+04 <time_off:6>200029 
<name:12>Name Example <qth:25>02320 Balazote (Albacete) 
<comment:25>FT8? Sent: +01? Rcvd: +04 
?
?<dxcc:3>281? <ituz:2>37? <cqz:2>14 ?
<pfx:3>EA5? <cont:2>EU? <freq:9>50.315441 ?
<gridsquare:4>IM88 ?
<notes:9>Notes ...

<qso_complete:1>? ?
? <lotw_qsl_sent:1>Y? <lotw_qsl_rcvd:1>N ?
<lotw_qslsdate:8>20240716? <lotw_qslrdate:8>20240716? ?

?<DME:5>02012 ?

<distance:5>00111 ?

<qrzcom_qso_upload_status:1>Y ?
<qrzcom_qso_upload_date:10>2024-06-10 ?
?
?<app_qrzlog_logid:10>1109247426 
<my_name_intl:25>V¨ªctor Jos¨¦ 'Vic' S¨¢nchez <my_city_intl:8>Albacete <my_postal_code_intl:5>02003 
<my_state:2>AB <my_cq_zone:2>14 <my_itu_zone:2>37 
<my_gridsquare:6>IM98bx <my_lat:11>N038 58.750 <my_lon:11>W001 52.500 <my_rig_intl:12>Yaesu FT-847 <station_callsign:6>EA4GRG <operator:6>EA4GRG 

<eor>

----

El 1/8/24 a las 16:26, ok1mlg via ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
Hi,

The SWL Check is not a problem. I don't see from your description how you use it, but I assume that the SWL check should be present in the QSO Detail Dialog, right?

On the other hand, I have a problem with the UserDefined field. Unfortunately, it is still not clear from your description how you use it. Also, keep in mind that UserDefined fields are not transferable between applications. So, I would be very careful with this one. I just want to know if something that is already used in ADIF (e.g. SIG field) can be used instead of UserDefined fields. That's why I would like you to describe an example of its usage.

Regards
Ladislav


st 31. 7. 2024 v?11:11 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:

Hi,

thanks for your answer and sorry if I misunderstanding

El 31/7/24 a las 11:00, ok1mlg via ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
HI,

It's not a problem to add something. But I have to know what and why it should be added. Unfortunately, it is not entirely clear from your description what and why you want to add.

SWL Check - Do you mean ADIF field "SWL"?

Yes. Sometimes I receive listener-only reports and it could be interesting.


USERDEF - Do you mean ADIF's USERDEF that are defined like ? Can you please describe what you use it for?
Yes. I usually use for some kind of awards to store extra information for easy searching.


Regards
Ladislav

Both are only suggestions.

Regards.


st 31. 7. 2024 v?10:39 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:
Hi all,

this is my first post in QLog mailing list. I've just trying it and it
looks very well. I'd like to ask for a couple of features to take into
account for future releases, if it was possible:

- SWL check (or whatever seemly) in a QSO info

- USERDEF fields support

Thanks in advance and congratulations for your work.







Re: #featurerequest SWL and USERDEF fields options #featurerequest

 

Thank you for your explanation.


p¨¢ 2. 8. 2024 v?9:50 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:

Hi,

maybe USERDEFINED ADIF fields is a feature not much people use. I only suggested 'cos I use it but it maybe worthless and difficult to implement.

Next an edited example from a simple ADIF registry with USERDEFINED field:

<adif_ver:5>3.0.9

<USERDEF1:3:S>DME
<USERDEF2:3:S>DCE
<USERDEF3:4:S>DEFE
<USERDEF4:4:S>DMVE
<USERDEF5:4:S>DMUE
<USERDEF6:4:S>DVGE
<USERDEF7:3:S>DEE
<USERDEF8:4:S>EAFF
<eoh>

<qso_date:8:d>20240610 <time_on:6>195930 
<call:6>EA5XXX <band:2>6M <mode:3>FT8 <tx_pwr:3>100 
<rst_sent:3>+01 <rst_rcvd:3>+04 <time_off:6>200029 
<name:12>Name Example <qth:25>02320 Balazote (Albacete) 
<comment:25>FT8? Sent: +01? Rcvd: +04 
?
?<dxcc:3>281? <ituz:2>37? <cqz:2>14 ?
<pfx:3>EA5? <cont:2>EU? <freq:9>50.315441 ?
<gridsquare:4>IM88 ?
<notes:9>Notes ...

<qso_complete:1>? ?
? <lotw_qsl_sent:1>Y? <lotw_qsl_rcvd:1>N ?
<lotw_qslsdate:8>20240716? <lotw_qslrdate:8>20240716? ?

?<DME:5>02012 ?

<distance:5>00111 ?

<qrzcom_qso_upload_status:1>Y ?
<qrzcom_qso_upload_date:10>2024-06-10 ?
?
?<app_qrzlog_logid:10>1109247426 
<my_name_intl:25>V¨ªctor Jos¨¦ 'Vic' S¨¢nchez <my_city_intl:8>Albacete <my_postal_code_intl:5>02003 
<my_state:2>AB <my_cq_zone:2>14 <my_itu_zone:2>37 
<my_gridsquare:6>IM98bx <my_lat:11>N038 58.750 <my_lon:11>W001 52.500 <my_rig_intl:12>Yaesu FT-847 <station_callsign:6>EA4GRG <operator:6>EA4GRG 

<eor>

----

El 1/8/24 a las 16:26, ok1mlg via ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
Hi,

The SWL Check is not a problem. I don't see from your description how you use it, but I assume that the SWL check should be present in the QSO Detail Dialog, right?

On the other hand, I have a problem with the UserDefined field. Unfortunately, it is still not clear from your description how you use it. Also, keep in mind that UserDefined fields are not transferable between applications. So, I would be very careful with this one. I just want to know if something that is already used in ADIF (e.g. SIG field) can be used instead of UserDefined fields. That's why I would like you to describe an example of its usage.

Regards
Ladislav


st 31. 7. 2024 v?11:11 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:

Hi,

thanks for your answer and sorry if I misunderstanding

El 31/7/24 a las 11:00, ok1mlg via ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
HI,

It's not a problem to add something. But I have to know what and why it should be added. Unfortunately, it is not entirely clear from your description what and why you want to add.

SWL Check - Do you mean ADIF field "SWL"?

Yes. Sometimes I receive listener-only reports and it could be interesting.


USERDEF - Do you mean ADIF's USERDEF that are defined like ? Can you please describe what you use it for?
Yes. I usually use for some kind of awards to store extra information for easy searching.


Regards
Ladislav

Both are only suggestions.

Regards.


st 31. 7. 2024 v?10:39 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:
Hi all,

this is my first post in QLog mailing list. I've just trying it and it
looks very well. I'd like to ask for a couple of features to take into
account for future releases, if it was possible:

- SWL check (or whatever seemly) in a QSO info

- USERDEF fields support

Thanks in advance and congratulations for your work.







Re: #featurerequest SWL and USERDEF fields options #featurerequest

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi,

maybe USERDEFINED ADIF fields is a feature not much people use. I only suggested 'cos I use it but it maybe worthless and difficult to implement.

Next an edited example from a simple ADIF registry with USERDEFINED field:

<adif_ver:5>3.0.9

<USERDEF1:3:S>DME
<USERDEF2:3:S>DCE
<USERDEF3:4:S>DEFE
<USERDEF4:4:S>DMVE
<USERDEF5:4:S>DMUE
<USERDEF6:4:S>DVGE
<USERDEF7:3:S>DEE
<USERDEF8:4:S>EAFF
<eoh>

<qso_date:8:d>20240610 <time_on:6>195930 
<call:6>EA5XXX <band:2>6M <mode:3>FT8 <tx_pwr:3>100 
<rst_sent:3>+01 <rst_rcvd:3>+04 <time_off:6>200029 
<name:12>Name Example <qth:25>02320 Balazote (Albacete) 
<comment:25>FT8? Sent: +01? Rcvd: +04 
?
?<dxcc:3>281? <ituz:2>37? <cqz:2>14 ?
<pfx:3>EA5? <cont:2>EU? <freq:9>50.315441 ?
<gridsquare:4>IM88 ?
<notes:9>Notes ...

<qso_complete:1>? ?
? <lotw_qsl_sent:1>Y? <lotw_qsl_rcvd:1>N ?
<lotw_qslsdate:8>20240716? <lotw_qslrdate:8>20240716? ?

?<DME:5>02012 ?

<distance:5>00111 ?

<qrzcom_qso_upload_status:1>Y ?
<qrzcom_qso_upload_date:10>2024-06-10 ?
?
?<app_qrzlog_logid:10>1109247426 
<my_name_intl:25>V¨ªctor Jos¨¦ 'Vic' S¨¢nchez <my_city_intl:8>Albacete <my_postal_code_intl:5>02003 
<my_state:2>AB <my_cq_zone:2>14 <my_itu_zone:2>37 
<my_gridsquare:6>IM98bx <my_lat:11>N038 58.750 <my_lon:11>W001 52.500 <my_rig_intl:12>Yaesu FT-847 <station_callsign:6>EA4GRG <operator:6>EA4GRG 

<eor>

----

El 1/8/24 a las 16:26, ok1mlg via groups.io ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:

Hi,

The SWL Check is not a problem. I don't see from your description how you use it, but I assume that the SWL check should be present in the QSO Detail Dialog, right?

On the other hand, I have a problem with the UserDefined field. Unfortunately, it is still not clear from your description how you use it. Also, keep in mind that UserDefined fields are not transferable between applications. So, I would be very careful with this one. I just want to know if something that is already used in ADIF (e.g. SIG field) can be used instead of UserDefined fields. That's why I would like you to describe an example of its usage.

Regards
Ladislav


st 31. 7. 2024 v?11:11 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:

Hi,

thanks for your answer and sorry if I misunderstanding

El 31/7/24 a las 11:00, ok1mlg via ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
HI,

It's not a problem to add something. But I have to know what and why it should be added. Unfortunately, it is not entirely clear from your description what and why you want to add.

SWL Check - Do you mean ADIF field "SWL"?

Yes. Sometimes I receive listener-only reports and it could be interesting.


USERDEF - Do you mean ADIF's USERDEF that are defined like ? Can you please describe what you use it for?
Yes. I usually use for some kind of awards to store extra information for easy searching.


Regards
Ladislav

Both are only suggestions.

Regards.


st 31. 7. 2024 v?10:39 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:
Hi all,

this is my first post in QLog mailing list. I've just trying it and it
looks very well. I'd like to ask for a couple of features to take into
account for future releases, if it was possible:

- SWL check (or whatever seemly) in a QSO info

- USERDEF fields support

Thanks in advance and congratulations for your work.







Re: #featurerequest SWL and USERDEF fields options #featurerequest

 

Hi,

The SWL Check is not a problem. I don't see from your description how you use it, but I assume that the SWL check should be present in the QSO Detail Dialog, right?

On the other hand, I have a problem with the UserDefined field. Unfortunately, it is still not clear from your description how you use it. Also, keep in mind that UserDefined fields are not transferable between applications. So, I would be very careful with this one. I just want to know if something that is already used in ADIF (e.g. SIG field) can be used instead of UserDefined fields. That's why I would like you to describe an example of its usage.

Regards
Ladislav


st 31. 7. 2024 v?11:11 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:

Hi,

thanks for your answer and sorry if I misunderstanding

El 31/7/24 a las 11:00, ok1mlg via ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
HI,

It's not a problem to add something. But I have to know what and why it should be added. Unfortunately, it is not entirely clear from your description what and why you want to add.

SWL Check - Do you mean ADIF field "SWL"?

Yes. Sometimes I receive listener-only reports and it could be interesting.


USERDEF - Do you mean ADIF's USERDEF that are defined like ? Can you please describe what you use it for?
Yes. I usually use for some kind of awards to store extra information for easy searching.


Regards
Ladislav

Both are only suggestions.

Regards.


st 31. 7. 2024 v?10:39 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:
Hi all,

this is my first post in QLog mailing list. I've just trying it and it
looks very well. I'd like to ask for a couple of features to take into
account for future releases, if it was possible:

- SWL check (or whatever seemly) in a QSO info

- USERDEF fields support

Thanks in advance and congratulations for your work.







Re: #featurerequest SWL and USERDEF fields options #featurerequest

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi,

thanks for your answer and sorry if I misunderstanding

El 31/7/24 a las 11:00, ok1mlg via groups.io ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
HI,

It's not a problem to add something. But I have to know what and why it should be added. Unfortunately, it is not entirely clear from your description what and why you want to add.

SWL Check - Do you mean ADIF field "SWL"?

Yes. Sometimes I receive listener-only reports and it could be interesting.


USERDEF - Do you mean ADIF's USERDEF that are defined like ? Can you please describe what you use it for?
Yes. I usually use for some kind of awards to store extra information for easy searching.


Regards
Ladislav

Both are only suggestions.

Regards.


st 31. 7. 2024 v?10:39 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:
Hi all,

this is my first post in QLog mailing list. I've just trying it and it
looks very well. I'd like to ask for a couple of features to take into
account for future releases, if it was possible:

- SWL check (or whatever seemly) in a QSO info

- USERDEF fields support

Thanks in advance and congratulations for your work.







Re: #featurerequest SWL and USERDEF fields options #featurerequest

 

HI,

It's not a problem to add something. But I have to know what and why it should be added. Unfortunately, it is not entirely clear from your description what and why you want to add.

SWL Check - Do you mean ADIF field "SWL"?

USERDEF - Do you mean ADIF's USERDEF that are defined like ? Can you please describe what you use it for?

Regards
Ladislav

st 31. 7. 2024 v?10:39 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan=[email protected]> napsal:

Hi all,

this is my first post in QLog mailing list. I've just trying it and it
looks very well. I'd like to ask for a couple of features to take into
account for future releases, if it was possible:

- SWL check (or whatever seemly) in a QSO info

- USERDEF fields support

Thanks in advance and congratulations for your work.