Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
Back to back gauge
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 22 Jan 2015, at 07:04, Simon Jones simon@... [O14] <O14@...> wrote:
|
James, many thanks for taking this initiative! Just to repeat my confirmation from the NGRM-online forum so that you have my e-mail address attached. As for?proper use of the Yahoo?group, in my opinion, absolutely! best regards from Sweden, George! ? From: "James Hockley jameshockley_38@... [O14]" To: "O14@..." Sent: Thursday, 22 January 2015, 0:32 Subject: Re: [O14] Back to back gauge
?
The interest in this is looking good, thank you guys. There is no great rush, Malcolm won't be making them for about 4 weeks, I have a list going of who wants what, if the numbers go up any price reduction will be passed on. I am not intending to make money out of this, just cover the costs. I will not ask for any payment until they arrive. Closer to the time I will email a list of who wants what, to ensure no one has been missed. I hope this is proper use of the Yahoo group. James?
|
James
Please tell Malcolm that if he wants to make this a standard product (or make a few extra for stock) then we can put details and links on the O14 group website. And Adrian may want to put details in 7mm NGA News. John On 21 January 2015 16:07:22 GMT+00:00, "James Hockley jameshockley_38@... [O14]" wrote: ? -- Sent from my phone with K-9 Mail. |
Hi James I have always seen this Group as an online self-help group and this sort of project is real and practical self-help.? You are to be applauded for your initiative (and doggedness, I know how long you have been after one of these).? The availability of more 'home-grown' solutions, tools and jigs can only help 014.? Well done. Now does someone fancy producing a three-point track gauge so I can get consistent gauge widening on curves? Cheers David From: "James Hockley jameshockley_38@... [O14]" To: "O14@..." Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2015, 23:32 Subject: Re: [O14] Back to back gauge
?
The interest in this is looking good, thank you guys. There is no great rush, Malcolm won't be making them for about 4 weeks, I have a list going of who wants what, if the numbers go up any price reduction will be passed on. I am not intending to make money out of this, just cover the costs. I will not ask for any payment until they arrive. Closer to the time I will email a list of who wants what, to ensure no one has been missed. I hope this is proper use of the Yahoo group. James?
|
开云体育David, ? Make your own, buy either a three point gauge in 00 finescale or EM. Make yourself a few inches of 14mm dead straight track gauged with callipers. Cut the bought gauge in half, and take a few mm out of the centre. Place one part on each rail of your standard track. Apply Araldite to the top surfaces. (File flat first if there is any raised lettering). Put a piece of metal, almost anything will do, on the Araldite. Weight on top of the rails so the whole lot goes flat, or clamp, hair grips, plate and gauge sections. The other way is to build it upside down with the track rail down on top. ? Go to bed, Araldite will have set by morning. ? I'll be offering one of those as well, if I can find it! ? Frank |
Frank Thanks for that!? Your pragmatic method is an awful lot simpler (and more foolproof?) than the method I had previously attempted - and failed - which used a triangle of brass, three carefully drilled holes and three 4BA bolts soldered in place with the screw slot widened to accept the rail section of my choice.? Try as I might I just could not get the accuracy I needed; but the gauge widening worked fine! Does anyone make a three point 00 track gauge anymore? Cheers David From: "'Frank Sharp' frank.j.sharp@... [O14]" To: O14@... Sent: Thursday, 22 January 2015, 10:18 Subject: RE: [O14] Back to back gauge
?
David, ? Make your own, buy either a three point gauge in 00 finescale or EM. Make yourself a few inches of 14mm dead straight track gauged with callipers. Cut the bought gauge in half, and take a few mm out of the centre. Place one part on each rail of your standard track. Apply Araldite to the top surfaces. (File flat first if there is any raised lettering). Put a piece of metal, almost anything will do, on the Araldite. Weight on top of the rails so the whole lot goes flat, or clamp, hair grips, plate and gauge sections. The other way is to build it upside down with the track rail down on top. ? Go to bed, Araldite will have set by morning. ? I'll be offering one of those as well, if I can find it! ? Frank |
开云体育David, ? Worth trying anyone doing finescale track, Carrs maybe, or is there a society? ? Your bolt method works fine, widen the slot first, drill the plate oversize and Araldite the bolts with it sat on your 'standard' track. There's then no stress on the bolts whilst they set. ? Frank ? From: O14@... [mailto:O14@...]
Sent: 22 January 2015 10:44 To: O14@... Subject: Re: [O14] Back to back gauge ? ? Frank ? Thanks for that!? Your pragmatic method is an awful lot simpler (and more foolproof?) than the method I had previously attempted - and failed - which used a triangle of brass, three carefully drilled holes and three 4BA bolts soldered in place with the screw slot widened to accept the rail section of my choice.? Try as I might I just could not get the accuracy I needed; but the gauge widening worked fine! ? Does anyone make a three point 00 track gauge anymore? ? Cheers ? David ? From: "'Frank Sharp' frank.j.sharp@... [O14]" <O14@...> ? ? David, ? Make your own, buy either a three point gauge in 00 finescale or EM. Make yourself a few inches of 14mm dead straight track gauged with callipers. Cut the bought gauge in half, and take a few mm out of the centre. Place one part on each rail of your standard track. Apply Araldite to the top surfaces. (File flat first if there is any raised lettering). Put a piece of metal, almost anything will do, on the Araldite. Weight on top of the rails so the whole lot goes f lat, or clamp, hair grips, plate and gauge sections. The other way is to build it upside down with the track rail down on top. ? Go to bed, Araldite will have set by morning. ? I'll be offering one of those as well, if I can find it! ? Frank ? |
开云体育Hi James Yes I would like one. Will the gauge be similar to their O gauge one and show the maximum back to back of 12.50 mm as well as the minimum of 12.40 mm as in RCL standards? kind regards Julian Saxton On 21 Jan 2015, at 08:16, James Hockley jameshockley_38@... [O14] <O14@...> wrote:
|
开云体育Hi Julian,
I had not planned to have the gauge done in that way.
It is possible but would increase the price due to the increased production process.
I can discuss the options with Malcolm when I see him on Sunday and see how that would affect the price.
James?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S5 - powered by Three
-------- Original message --------
From: "Julian Saxton julian_saxton@... [O14]" Date:22/01/2015 11:34 (GMT+00:00) To: O14@... Cc: Subject: Re: [O14] Back to back gauge ?
Hi James
Yes I would like one.
Will the gauge be similar to their O gauge one and show the maximum back to back of 12.50 mm as well as the minimum of 12.40 mm as in RCL standards?
kind regards
Julian Saxton
|
Hi James, Okay still count me in for one whatever you decide to go ahead with. Up to now I have been using G.W. Models adjustable back to back for 3mm scale, it goes from 10.3 to 12.8. ?Which is handy for ?moving 16.5 wheel sets, as you can set the back to back for each wheel ?to be moved along the axel so as to be equidistant from the centre. I use an axel push made by Fahrmann. Even so a fix gauge will be very useful. Regards Julian On Thursday, 22 January 2015, 13:11, "James Hockley jameshockley_38@... [O14]"
?
Hi Julian,
I had not planned to have the gauge done in that way.
It is possible but would increase the price due to the increased production process.
I can discuss the options with Malcolm when I see him on Sunday and see how that would affect the price.
James?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S5 - powered by Three
-------- Original message --------
From: "Julian Saxton julian_saxton@... [O14]" Date:22/01/2015 11:34 (GMT+00:00) To: O14@... Cc: Subject: Re: [O14] Back to back gauge ?
Hi James
Yes I would like one.
Will the gauge be similar to their O gauge one and show the maximum back to back of 12.50 mm as well as the minimum of 12.40 mm as in RCL standards?
kind regards
Julian Saxton
|
开云体育Thank you every one who has asked for one. Currently up to 28 units. ?I might round it up to 30 and sell a couple on the Narrow Gauge online forum. Closer to when they are produced I will ask everyone to email me personally with confirmation of order and address details. Thanks for all the interest so far. I will update on Monday when I have spoken to Malcolm on Sunday at the O gauge show in Bristol, with any luck a slightly better price, no promises! Regards? James? On 23 Jan 2015, at 00:48, grant.mcadam@... [O14] <O14@...> wrote:
|
开云体育Hi James,Sorry busy week, crawling out of the woodwork late, could you make me the 29th order?
many thanks
Gary
(David Hughes’ Wessex group)
Gary Shearn
Marlborough | SN8 1PA Office: +44 (0)1672 892366 On 23 Jan 2015, at 17:03, James Hockley
jameshockley_38@... [O14] <O14@...> wrote:
? ? DISCLAIMER: "Opinions, conclusions and other information contained in this e-mail that do not relate to the official business of Marlborough College shall not be understood as endorsed or given by the College. Any attachments are confidential and may be the subject of legal privilege. Any use, copying or disclosure other than by the intended recipient is unauthorised. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message and any copies from your computer and network" |
开云体育A bit late to the game but please put
me down for one.
Bruce Wilson Barrie, Ontario, Canada Life Member NMRA Member Scale 7 Group Gauge 0 Guild 7mmNGA Member Bird Studies Canada Ontario Bird Banding Association Brereton Field Naturalists' Club Simcoe County Banding GroupOn 23/01/2015 12:03, James Hockley jameshockley_38@... [O14] wrote:
|
开云体育James,
I noticed that Romford [Markits] have a back to back gauge which is
12.8mm., I don’t know what these gauges are going to cost, but was going to
suggest looking at what these Romford gauges cost and just putting them in a
lathe and running .4mm. off.
?
Brian
Qld. Aust. ? From: mailto:O14@...
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 3:03 AM
To: O14@...
Subject: Re: [O14] Back to back gauge ?
Thank you every one who has asked for one.
?
Currently up to 28 units.? I might round it up to 30 and sell a couple
on the Narrow Gauge online forum.
?
Closer to when they are produced I will ask everyone to email me personally
with confirmation of order and address details.
?
Thanks for all the interest so far.
?
I will update on Monday when I have spoken to Malcolm on Sunday at the O
gauge show in Bristol, with any luck a slightly better price, no promises!
?
Regards
?
James
No virus found in this
message. |
开云体育Hi Brian, I agree that would be a good solution (I think they are for 3mm fine scale), but I don't have access to a lathe or the knowledge on how to use one. ?If I did it would a good method to produce a gauge. I am quite far advanced down the road of getting this gauge sorted and I am hoping the price will come down a bit as I can place an order for 30+ units. James? On 23 Jan 2015, at 20:42, 'Brian' rallim56@... [O14] <O14@...> wrote:
|
开云体育I will be at the bristol show on Sunday with my standard gauge layout "Ultramarine Works" pop round for a chat On 23 Jan 2015, at 17:03, James Hockley jameshockley_38@... [O14] <O14@...> wrote:
|
Roy Link
开云体育Dear All,Re the proposed back to back gauge being proposed. Note that the min-max of 12.40 to 12.50mm applies ONLY if you have the matching wheel profile - which is that proposed by the BRMSB as ‘EM’ in 1950. This profile was used by Alan Gibson and MayGib and sold by them as ‘fine scale OO’ during the time I was developing and producing my range of O14 kits. I took wheels from both, the loco tyres coming from Alan and those used in the rolling stock from Ken Pelham at ?MayGib. I moulded my own centres in polypropylene - the rolling stock axles were purchased jointly with Alan Gibson in batches of 20,000 (split two ways). Alan sold them for ‘ TT fine scale’. Use of any other wheel profile will cause varying problems - good tracking is only assured if standards are kept to quite strictly - particularly on locos with more than two axles. Mixing profiles, especially those un-published is risky. My standards were the result of practical experiment - based on the old BRMSB measurements and logic. They allowed perfect tracking of small four wheel locos and wagons around sharp radius curves without derailment, either pulled or propelled. A long time ago I did propose that, for models of larger two-foot gauge prototypes, it would be better to adopt modified NMRA ‘Sn3’ standards - which are more sophisticated than those of the BRMSB - which were more guidelines. On 23 Jan 2015, at 17:03, James Hockley jameshockley_38@... [O14] <O14@...> wrote:
|
开云体育Roy,Can you suggest to me a s newbie a min-max other than 12.40-12.50 that you feel would have wider applicability to O14?
Many thanks
Gary
Gary Shearn
Marlborough | SN8 1PA On 24 Jan 2015, at 11:02, Roy Link
rclpubs@... [O14] <O14@...> wrote:
? ? DISCLAIMER: "Opinions, conclusions and other information contained in this e-mail that do not relate to the official business of Marlborough College shall not be understood as endorsed or given by the College. Any attachments are confidential and may be the subject of legal privilege. Any use, copying or disclosure other than by the intended recipient is unauthorised. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message and any copies from your computer and network" |