Re: Baldwin Coal Bunker
|
Thanks very much for the clarification David.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I think that I am probably okay given how I am using the original information and the fact that I don't want to formally publish, just share. Douglas was a true craftsman and very particular about identifying dimensions. His drawings were prepared to a much larger scale and looked very impressive but some of the details became obscured when reduced by the 'cross-hare' identification of circle or radius centres. While I was happy to use his drawing as intended, I felt that I needed something less cluttered for some of the details. Regards, Robin -----Original Message-----
From: O14@... [mailto:O14@...] Sent: 28 July 2017 4:04 PM To: O14@... Subject: [O14] Re: Baldwin Coal Bunker If you add sufficient intellectual property from your own efforts to something that was originally produced by someone else, and you don’t show anything extraneous from the original, then you don’t need the originator’s permission to publish what has become, on balance, your intellectual property but you should acknowledge their original contribution. Of course, if the original originator is still contactable, it is always a good idea to communicate with them before publishing your own work, they may after all have discovered something else new in the meantime, but there is no obligation too. Note that basic lists can never be considered as intellectual property. ------------------------------------ Posted by: David Woodcock <dandewoodcock@...> ------------------------------------ The O14 Group website: forum: ------------------------------------ Yahoo Groups Links |
Robin Edwards