¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: KAM XL "Rcv" LED???
Try changing the CD (Carrier Detect) to software, that should sort the blinking out. cmd: CD software/software 73, John K2ZA
By k2za · #1600 ·
KAM XL "Rcv" LED???
Dumb question here, I have running station on NET 105, but am curious as to the "Rcv" LED on my KAM. It blinks frequently even with the lack of packet signals, so I assume it is just responding to
By Garry Cramins (AE5HL) <gpcramins@...> · #1599 ·
Re: 17 meters and 10 meters
Steve, A little off topic but... I saw your AX25 connect to WA3WLH-7 this morning on 14107 USB / 14110.4 LSB but assume you did not copy the response since it retried out. I share an ax25 port up
By WA3WLH - Rich · #1598 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
Do it and I'll meet you there.... 73
By Jim <jim@...> · #1597 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
While not the intended recipient, I'll second AMTOR... Matter of fact, I'm even thinking of putting my machine on an unused portion, maybe below 14.105, and setting up an AMTOR BBS... Garry (AE5HL)
By Garry Cramins (AE5HL) <gpcramins@...> · #1596 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
I remember that RTTY MSO.?? Always wished I had purchased one....back in the 80's! I'm running 3 mechanical machines.? 1 Model 15, 1 Model 28 and 1 Model 19. Let's get RTTY going again too!!!
By Jim <jim@...> · #1595 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
Jim, I couldn't agree more.?? I love Olivia (took some explaining to the XYL but she understands now), Contesia, PSK....RTTY ( I actually have 3 mechanical macines!) I love all that stuff....and
By Jim <jim@...> · #1594 ·
My first AX25 HF packet node is up!
Greetings, I've set up a BPQCHAT/BPQBBS node in DM14. We'll see how it goes. I set up the node to the best of my abilities to adhere to the net guidelines posted. I will be writing up a guide on my
Re: 17 meters and 10 meters
Hi Alan, I heared you on 14105 LSB a few minutes ago and I tried to connect, but I think the band faded away before I was able to make the connection. I've never seen any frequencies documented for
By Steve K4RVA · #1592 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
Hi David, Do you have any noise interfering with the incoming packets?? For a while here, the "smart" meter that the electric company installed at the house would periodically generate so much hash,
By Jeff KP3FT · #1591 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
David, I'm also in Utah; down near Moab.? It really sounds like there is something wrong with your setup.? During the day, I usually have 15 or more stations in my heard list on 20m for the past
By Joshua KJ7LVZ · #1590 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
Garry AE5HL you are in Albuquerque, right next to a big cluster of packet stations in TX and across the South, plus the guys to the west in the San Diego area. I¡¯m in UT, where the nearest packet
By David, K7DMJ · #1589 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
Well put Chris retro computer collector here and yes I love packet even have the full set up for an Acorn BBC master to do it and rtty on a Sinclair zx spectrum 48k but my packet goto is a windows 3:1
By John Earnshaw M0JFE · #1588 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
Hi David, In case this helps, these are the things that commonly trip me up and frustrate me: - Wrong sound card and/or mic device selected - Wrong baud rate, I forgot to switch between 300 and 1200
By Bradley, KC1JMH · #1587 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
I suspect this is more of an antenna problem, or possibly with your TNC (software?). I was up and running in short order with an end fed and a Kam XL... What is your setup? Garry (AE5HL)
By Garry Cramins (AE5HL) <gpcramins@...> · #1586 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
Ax. 25 is thriving I am going to see and do the best I can to help make it grow agsin. 73 N3LBP Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ Sent: Wednesday,
By Amateur radio operator CHUCK · #1585 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
Hmmm....Do you have a high noise level? Refresh our memories: what is your setup? Hardware? Software? Antenna? What is the dial frequency you're setting your radio to? I know you said you're in Utah
By Chris Lance WW2BSA · #1584 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
I have no choice but to give up on AX.25 since I cannot decode ANY packets in my location on most days, based on several attempts. I¡¯m not decoding any beacons. They should be coming out of most
By David, K7DMJ · #1583 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
The new modes up and coming but ax.25 is thriving very ans growing slowly. I would it give up on it is a great mode. I am working on many plans for my bbs. 73 N3LBP Get Outlook for
By Amateur radio operator CHUCK · #1582 ·
Re: why do people persist with AX.25 when more robust modes now exist?
LOL!!! A CW BBS would be cool! How about this Garry: After 10 years of hunting, I acquired a copy of C64 RTTY MSO. I have the C64 computer, drive, monitor, AEA CP-1 and CP-100, cables and radios. Just
By Chris Lance WW2BSA · #1581 ·