Re: nanoVNA Real Resistance Measurement Range
Hi Tom,
Very good.
The paper published by Copper Mountain applications was irrespective of frequency. The sensitivity analysis was conducted for the measurement of any S11, S21 so that would
By
alan victor
·
#2490
·
|
Re: New, disappointed member intro
Unfortunately, I still have the same issue with the new buttons not being sensed normally and it does not appear to be a debounce issue. Im starting to think that it might be related to the realtime
By
Larry Rothman
·
#2489
·
|
Re: nanoVNA Real Resistance Measurement Range
Greetings All,
I decided it would be interesting to do a series of tests with the nanoVNA calibration optimized for my DIY low reactance reference loads. The objective was to get a feel for
By
Tom VA7TA
·
#2488
·
|
question about firmware, I am not a programmer, DFU file
hello,
I would like to know if possible to put firmware in the files section with .dfu extension
I am not a programmer only a basic user. It's hard to find .dfu files, the different new firmware
By
VE2KWG
·
#2487
·
|
Re: Suggestion to mention md5 checksums of firmware
* Testing antennas
* Fun
* Educational
The 8753ES and 8720D are not exactly portable. ???I once wrote a bit of
code that allowed me to keep the 8720D inside, hook that up to an
By
Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...>
·
#2486
·
|
An interesting calibration method ¡°Quickcal¡± on Agilent Fieldfox range
The Agilent/Keysight FieldFox range are in theory great analyzers, although
they are pricey. The N9912A is very poor though.
The FirldFox range have an interesting calibration method
By
Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...>
·
#2485
·
|
Re: Short-Open-Load - expected reflected power
David
I have two NanoVNAs and two 1-3000 MHz RF bridges. I get identical results with all four. The VNAs are calibrated with one set of supplied OSL terminations. When I use the bridge with the
By
Warren Allgyer
·
#2484
·
|
Re: nanoVNA Real Resistance Measurement Range
The high impedance head is usable for low impedances too, but the accuracy
is not as good as the low impedance head. However, I don¡¯t believe that the
low impedance head can be used for high
By
Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...>
·
#2483
·
|
Re: nanoVNA Real Resistance Measurement Range
Hi Tom,
Did you know that if you are working with antennas (or whatever) close
to another characteristic impedance than 50 Ohms, you can just calibrate
with that value of load resistor?? The
By
Rob Frohne (KL7NA)
·
#2482
·
|
Re: New, disappointed member intro
Hi Larry,
Did this solve the flakiness problem with the switch?? In another thread
earlier, it was seemingly so common, we concluded it was due to not
using pin interrupts, and polling for switch
By
Rob Frohne (KL7NA)
·
#2481
·
|
Re: nanoVNA Real Resistance Measurement Range
Hi Kirby and others,
My apologies.
I've just re-studied the AIM circuit diagram (it's about >10 years that I have studied it last time when I purchased it)
and I have to correct myself.
It is indeed
By
Clemens Paul
·
#2480
·
|
Re: Suggestion to mention md5 checksums of firmware
Dr, Kirby,
Happy to see participation in the group from someone as well known Kirby Microwave. Just wondering why anyone that has thousands of dollars worth of lab equipment at their disposal has
By
hwalker
·
#2479
·
|
Re: NanoVNA firmware extended to 1500MHz with added scan command
Hello tinhead,
Thank you very much for the hint.
When you convert with DfuFileMgr.exe intermediate to HEX you avoid to enter a start address in case of the BIN format.
That makes it easier to add the
By
Rudi
·
#2478
·
|
Suggestion to mention md5 checksums of firmware
I see a number of references to different firmware versions. It is hard to
know what one person are referring to. If the md5 checksum of a binary was
given, there would be no doubt whether two
By
Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...>
·
#2477
·
|
Re: nanoVNA Real Resistance Measurement Range
Thank you.
With some aspects of amateur antennas have impedances well away from 50
ohms, the RF-IV might have some benefits for antennas, but the design looks
more complicated to me, having to get
By
Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...>
·
#2476
·
|
Re: Latest version of NanoVNA-Saver locking up for some reason
I upgraded to test 1500Mhz-sweep then went back to August
By
Ron Webb
·
#2475
·
|
Re: nanoVNA Real Resistance Measurement Range
Hi Kirby,
the attachments have loaded up with my second posting.
I'm aware that they contain nothing new for you but maybe for some other readers
and they show the intended use i.e. to characterize
By
Clemens Paul
·
#2474
·
|
Re: NanoVNA firmware extended to 1500MHz with added scan command
convert to hex, save it, open hex and convert to dfu
By
tinhead
·
#2473
·
|
Re: NanoVNA does not want to start -solved
all caps replaced, inductor as well, i found even recommended parts, but still it does not work anymore. By closer look on the design, well, it works exactly as it should - it is power bank IC, it
By
tinhead
·
#2472
·
|
Screen Protector
Just applied a screen protector to my NanoVNA.
Tech Armor HD Clear Plastic Film Screen Protector (NOT Glass) for New 2019
Apple iPhone 11 / iPhone Xr - Case-Friendly, Scratch Resistant, Haptic
Touch
By
Mike Cohen
·
#2471
·
|