¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: "Zero calibration" (or "no calibration") question
Or a UHF to SMA adapter (the 1/2" isn't important) and use your existing SMA cal standards.
By Jim Lux · #27068 ·
Re: Unit Won't turn on after charging
You can flash the Nano with an ST-Link interface. I bought one for $3 from Aliexpress - works great: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005001638056242.html Also avail on Amazon. I had a similar issue
By Larry Rothman · #27067 ·
Re: "Zero calibration" (or "no calibration") question
Get a set of female SO-238 Short, Open, Load calibration ends, and calibrate at the end of the coax which will attach to the antenna. 73, Ken N8KH
By Kenneth Hendrickson · #27066 ·
Re: Unit Won't turn on after charging
No luck with a new USB cable, still showing up as "Unknown USB Device (Device Descriptor Request Failed" in device manager. I'm wondering if the firmware can be flashed via serial somehow? I think I
By Brady Nelson · #27065 ·
Re: Unit Won't turn on after charging
Thanks, I will try a new USB cable and the Zadig app. I am mostly positive the correct drivers are installed, so maybe forcing the new drivers will help.
By Brady Nelson · #27064 ·
Re: "Zero calibration" (or "no calibration") question
On 3/4/22 7:43 AM, Miro, N9LR via groups.io wrote: > In HAM world, one of key uses for nano is antenna tuning, or at least better understanding what my TX is going to see. > > Very rarely we get a
By Jim Lux · #27063 ·
"Zero calibration" (or "no calibration") question
In HAM world, one of key uses for nano is antenna tuning, or at least better understanding what my TX is going to see. Very rarely we get a luxury to connect nano directly to antenna feed point over
By Miro, N9LR · #27062 ·
Re: NanoVNA-H Defective?
First off, Thanks to all that responded. Further checking on #2 VNA gives the same results; Smith Chart showing a solid 50 Ohm load with No Inputs/Cables connected to S11, on HF / VHF / UHF
By WD0AKZ · #27061 ·
Re: New Nano VNA V2 Plus 4 do not draw graph.
Hi Ron, Thank you for the tip. Someone also suggested same as you said. But there are few other things and until I do not go through them its not going to show the graph properly. I tried changing the
By Sohail Anjum · #27060 ·
Re: New Nano VNA V2 Plus 4 do not draw graph.
Hi Nick, Thank you for your reply. I already gone through that user guide that you are referring to. As you see I mentioned in my post above but obviously missing some important steps. I got some
By Sohail Anjum · #27059 ·
Re: NanoVNA-H Defective?
A dead receiver on CH0 would show good load, and bad open/short, because in the load case, there's no reflected power.
By Jim Lux · #27058 ·
Re: NanoVNA-H Defective?
One thing to try before concluding that a unit is bad would be to reflash the firmware, in case something has gotten corrupted and to be sure you are running current code; this is important in these
By Donald S Brant Jr · #27057 ·
Re: NanoVNA-H Defective?
200 Georges for that Keysight SMA torque wrench ICYAI more than the VNA
By Charlie N2MHS <ucfargis1@...> · #27056 ·
Re: NanoVNA-H Defective?
Odds are good that you either have a problem with the s11 SMA connector on the second #2 NanoVNA, or that your open and short calibration hats are dirty or somewhat defective. Try at a few different
By Colin McDonald · #27055 ·
Re: NanoVNA-H Defective?
The reflection coefficient is the voltage "reflected" back from the unit under test (it's voltage, not power, but it's similar to Ref/Fwd on a directional watt meter) - shorts and opens are "perfect
By Jim Lux · #27054 ·
Re: NanoVNA-H Defective?
Sorry Jim, I forgot to Thank You for your suggestion.? I never thought to verify the OSL on the Smith Chart like I did the first time I went through the Calibration procedure with the first NanoVNA-H
By WD0AKZ · #27053 ·
Re: NanoVNA-H Defective?
Ok, "reflection coefficient" on the Smith Chart?? Bingo!! VNA #2 on the Smith Chart I see a 50 ohm load on Open, Short and of course Load.? Calibrated or not. It's Broke? George
By WD0AKZ · #27052 ·
Re: NanoVNA-H Defective?
I'm sorry, I don't understand "reflection coefficient". I did now Reset Calibration and looked at the LogMag results if that what you were asking: #1 VNA O= -3db? S- -1db? L= -40db #2 VNA O= -86db?
By WD0AKZ · #27051 ·
Re: NanoVNA-H Defective?
what readings do you get for all three terminations *without calibration*? - the NanoVNA isn't perfect, but you should get close to 1, 0, and -1 for the reflection coefficient. And between two units,
By Jim Lux · #27050 ·
Re: NanoVNA-H Defective?
Yup, I agree... "Something's wrong here, this looks like you're measuring your load." Nope... "Something's wrong here, did you measure your load by accident? " "I'd go back and check the load and
By WD0AKZ · #27049 ·