¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: NanoVNA-H Defective?


 

On 3/2/22 8:16 PM, WD0AKZ via groups.io wrote:
Yup, I agree... "Something's wrong here, this looks like you're measuring your load."
Nope... "Something's wrong here, did you measure your load by accident? "
"I'd go back and check the load and short measurements (or the cals) "
I repeated this Calibration/test a number of times today, but I just did it again with the same results.
Lets say that I am Calibrating/testing correctly, so on the Open/Short tests, regarding the LogMag results, VNA #1 or #2 or Both are correct?

what readings do you get for all three terminations *without calibration*? - the NanoVNA isn't perfect, but you should get close to 1, 0, and -1 for the reflection coefficient.

And between two units, you'd expect to see similar values.

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.