Yes, open or shorted gives equivalent measurements (one is phase-reversed
from the other).
And terminated in the characteristic impedance of the cable will give an
'infinite' measurement (no reflection).
How to adapt to other cables? You can do other cables the same way, even if
they are balanced or not of 50-ohm impedance. You do need to know the
velocity factor.
And you also need to know that the measurement is not exact: you will only
get within several percent of the cable length at best. This is due to the
way the nanovna (or host software) does the TDR measurement. The nanovna
measures at discrete frequencies using its frequency scan, then the
software takes those points and calculates an FFT to change to the time
domain. This inherently uses a 'bin' size, which limits the granularity of
the measurement. You can see this granularity as you step across the TDR
graph - each calculated point is separated by this minimum granularity.
If your vna firmware has the "Measure / Cable" option in the menu, it is
better to use if you want to find the length of the cable (or the distance
to a break, if you have seen one in the TDR). It still is only as accurate
as your estimate of the cable velocity factor, but is accurately measured
(it uses a different technique without any binning effect/uncertainty).
The Measure Cable function will also show the characteristic impedance of
the cable, and the loss in dB along the length of the cable.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:26 AM tuckvk3cca <tuckvk3cca@...> wrote:
Great, thanks. So you get the same results if the end is either open or
shorted right? Reverse the cable and you can confirm where the break is.
With a dummy load the cable length should read very large with no kinks
right?
How do I adapt this to other cables? Do I need a balun?
