¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Quick compare with HP 8753C...


 

Great stuff, that matches up very nicely :)

Roger

On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 12:31, Jeff Anderson <jca1955@...> wrote:

Roger, I think everything is fine.

Using a cursor placed on my plots, I can step through the Return Loss for
each point. Here's what I see for the last 10 points for each capture:

Nano 8753
------------------
10.98 10.97 <- 273.27 MHz
10.98 10.97
10.97 10.97
10.96 10.96
10.96 10.96
10.98 10.96
10.98 10.96
10.96 10.95
10.95 10.95
10.94 10.95 <- 300 MHz

Discounting the rounding, these seem to trend pretty close (to me) to the
data shown in your plot. And note that the Nano data is noisier than the
8753C data, which matches what you show, too.

- Jeff




Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.