¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Quick compare with HP 8753C...


 

Roger, I think everything is fine.

Using a cursor placed on my plots, I can step through the Return Loss for each point. Here's what I see for the last 10 points for each capture:

Nano 8753
------------------
10.98 10.97 <- 273.27 MHz
10.98 10.97
10.97 10.97
10.96 10.96
10.96 10.96
10.98 10.96
10.98 10.96
10.96 10.95
10.95 10.95
10.94 10.95 <- 300 MHz

Discounting the rounding, these seem to trend pretty close (to me) to the data shown in your plot. And note that the Nano data is noisier than the 8753C data, which matches what you show, too.

- Jeff

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.