Sorry for my English.
I think that the appearance should be modest, the interface is very intuitive and all this so that the program is fast and the processor burdens little.
For me, this speed and convenience of use counts.
Also "I love" Fldigi :)
Jurek, sp3rat
W dniu 21.01.2025 o?14:42, Greg Cheng - KC3SMW via groups.io pisze:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I’ve been wondering how hard it would be to give FLDigi a graphical facelift.
I know the look of FLDigi doesn’t affect its usage, power, or capability. But in an era of dark mode, themes, and modern design, I’ve heard comments like, /“FLDigi is one of those old programs...”/ or even, /“It’s on its way out...”/—and I think it’s purely because of how it looks.
In reality, w1hkj and the team update, enhance, and improve the program regularly. I love FLDigi, use it nearly daily, and teach others why it should be every ham’s number one tool, in their digital tool box.
But hearing these comments makes me think a maybe a facelift could help change that perception.
I’d love to hear your thoughts.
--
Pomó? Wojtusiowi w walce z autyzmem: KRS 0000252666. Cel szczegó?owy: Wojciech Karg
