Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
Jumpers and zero-ohm resistors
开云体育How are jumpers? included in a board design?
Do they appear in the schematic or only in the PCB layout? Are
they to be treated as zero-ohm resistors, perhaps? -- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
They are normally in the schematic as zero ohm resistors. In the
layout they can be whatever you like, eg pukkka zero ohm resistors (wire-ended or surface mount), hand-cut wire links, blobs of solder, etc. Regards, Robert * Plain text email - safe, readable, inclusive. * -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com |
开云体育Thanks, Robert. I suppose they have to be
placed in the schematic exactly where they are needed in the
layout, which can make the schematic look very odd. On 2024-09-20 16:35, Robert via
groups.io wrote:
They are normally in the schematic as zero ohm resistors.?? In the -- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
开云体育Hello,??? Instead of jumper, I offen use so called in French "coffee bean". Just put a drop of solder to make the connection. ??? Regards, Jean-Paul **** Site : Le 2024-09-20 à 17:30, John Woodgate a
écrit?:
|
开云体育Thanks, Jean-Paul, but I want to jump over a
track on a 2-layer through-hole board. A zero-ohm resistor
works. On 2024-09-20 17:21, jpgendner via
groups.io wrote:
Hello, -- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
If you want to use headers and links, I have schematic symbols for those. Perhaps KiCad even has them in one of its extensive library, I don't know. Alternatively, use zero Ohm resistors, and add a text note to say what they are for. Do that, as well for links. If they are multiple position links, add a truth table. I try to put everything on the schematic. That way, nothing gets missed. -- Regards, Tony? On 20 Sep 2024 17:17, John Woodgate <jmw@...> wrote:
|
开云体育Thanks, Tony. My need is very simple, to allow
one track on a layer to cross another. I can put zero ohm
resistors on the schematic, but (inevitably, I suppose) that
restricts the routing of the jumpered track. In other words,
without the jumper I could join point C to either point A? or
point B, but if a jumper is needed between B and C, point C can
only be joined to point B. On 2024-09-20 17:49, Tony Casey wrote:
-- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
Given what you are trying to achieve, John, you could create a custom
schematic symbol that looks like a wire segment. You could even hide all the text fields. Basically it would just be two back-back pins, so once connected up it would just be a straight line on the schematic (albeit brown, which will help you find it again :)). Regards, Robert. |
开云体育Thank you, Robert. On 2024-09-20 20:05, Robert via
groups.io wrote:
Given what you are trying to achieve, John, you could create a custom -- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512 Hello John. I suppose they have to be placed in the schematicExactly. A schematic is used to document and describe your circuit, an despite this zero ohm resistor has nothing to do with the principal function of the circuit, it has a fundamental function at this board. So you have to show it in the schematic, but of course, with a comment. which can make theNot if you mention the following: For creating the board, you will need this jumper as a real material device. So for planning your materials, it should be noticed at the BOM, which can easily done by software, if this device is mentioned at the schematic. Also a jumper can be a nice place for measuring or injecting signals for trobleschooting. Another reason to show it at the schematic. Maybe even for orientating at schematic/board. Jumpers can be good landmarks. There are other types of jumpers, which are not made as zero ohm resistors for crossing, but by sockets and short circuit plugs or with (special) solder pads and solder blobs. Of course, also by pads and zero ohm resistors. This Type of jumpers are by function at reality switches, and so, they should be shown at the schematic as switches. With best regards Bernd Wiebus alias dl1eic Am Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:17:59 +0100 schrieb "John Woodgate via groups.io" <jmw@...>: Thanks, Robert. I suppose they have to be placed in the schematic-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEceydlAu1Ov6Z3ILE6D4maolCoowFAmbtyxcACgkQ6D4maolC oozmeggAgeo+MgVW5uDCTnHzMXq1WWsryHkTSy50JZGRKHbC/nhdlvwq4dyQlkYC vYbByLjxQcR18LekhlXWIsNrV9EogGAtLsDNulEfqk7Z5U8Qxx4PFRim6nCT/7Lr 4E1Sa3UBfo52VvmtSGqdy8YmF/4IT90fZFHERHsJM1PU2US8P4aktPOcsIsoEgtb DmnC7wQPmfdQWH90TPmqdz0Fcs29Y8QmjJvwt+//MRtchICeUm5TihEs+91mkzSD zAKsmXW1FG+97Rgs/Si1Fgkkbqg5+5lfA6PJfr7V54k9fALpxQUAOYIAde9A8Ktr ehAy1MVU5l6NcYv0M5LnSzOqRGy97Q== =R7/h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
开云体育Thank you, Bernd.
Hello John.> > > > > -- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
On 20.09.24 17:30, John Woodgate wrote: > Thanks, Jean-Paul, but I want to jump over a track on a 2-layer through-hole > board. A zero-ohm resistor works. Even in an antique kicad version, there are jumpers in the schematic symbol menu. I haven't checked the selection of footprint spacings available, but an edit there would soon provide the required spacing. Admittedly, the zero-ohm resistor avoids disturbing the other PCB side, and where that isn't a problem, then it's easier to whack in a via or two. So I'm guessing you have a busy board, with not much alternative to at least a 1206 footprint to let a track through. I don't mind a few smallish holes in a ground plane for a quick layer bounce or two, though. Yesterday's board from Seeed has such tiny vias that I can't see daylight through them, so not much real estate lost. I'm beginning to consider a general switch from 805 to 1206 passives anyway, to give eyes an hands an easier time. Erik |
For Through Hole boards, I use a 2-pin header, they are sold as such or you can buy 1x36 strips and break off as many pins as needed)...
3-pin header to select 2 paths...?
?
On the last page of the schematic I include the Shunts to make the connection and the Shunt consists of the Part Number and Color...
RED, BLK, BLU, GRN, WHT, etc...
?
This way when I get parts and boards I have enough of the right color shunts to populate the boards...
?
For SMT boards I use 0-ohm resistors...
?
73 (Best Wishes) Dallas N4DDM |
开云体育John, Robert, Zero Ohms resistors have the drawback to create two nets. I had similar issue some years ago with Kicad 5.20, it didn't have any practical solution for that. So, I cheated, creating symbol and models for keeping the same net name on both sides of the jumper. Mandatory for power lines. My computer being too old, I didn't migrate to newer kicad versions. Consequently, didn't test the trick on post 5.20. But since you're asking the jumper question I assume that this hasn't been solved. Instead, I made a specific component using 3 pads with the same net name, whichever the pad number is. In the middle a square one (thin and long, this is the "jumper wire"), of course not drilled and two round ones at the ends. The 3 pads were? overlapping, establishing a connection in between the ends. For the schematics,I created a dedicated symbol with one terminal, (I named it "lnk"), and filled the attribute table for the BOM. I placed it on a convenient place on the net the jumper is installed, I numbered it. That's all. Refer to the annexed files. Remember it's ver 5.20. You may have to modify it regarding the new version rules. My application was to route a number of different single side PCBs where power lines were routed on component side via jumper wires. Refer to: "Strap footprint.png" & "Strap footprints in use.png"In schema, the symbol was: "Strap symbol for eeschema.png", represented by "Strap Symbols attached to the drawing.png" in the electrical drawing. "My_Straps.pretty.rar" is the strap library model for 3.81 to 22.86 mm long jumpers. And for the PCB I also provide an example "strap_test.rar" (not functional, for decorating your bedroom only ! ). Have fun
On 20.09.24 18:49, Tony Casey via
groups.io wrote:
|
开云体育Thank you very much. I just want one trace on a through-hole board
to permanently 'hop over' another on the same layer. But 'Mandatory
for power lines.' worries me, because I do want to put a hop-over
in a power line (+ supply to an opamp).? Why is it mandatory and
what are the bad effects if it's not done? On 2024-09-21 18:14, Pierre-Raymond
Rondelle via groups.io wrote:
-- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512 Hello Pierre-Raymond Mandatory for power lines.Same Problem as for fuses. It is not the problem, that you use two nets (numbers will be enough) but for the ERC-Testing, because you end a power line, and the other end of the device is no power line. So the ERC-Test will throw errormessages. Cure for this seems for zero ohm resistors the same as for fuses: Define one pin as power input, so you can connect it to a symbol with power flag, and the outher as power output, so you can connect it to passive pins. Then the ERC will be satisfied. Of course, as for small designs, you can easyly ignore the error messages, as far as you not get confused with real errors. Be aware, there sometimes is a confusion with names. The pin, where the fuse or zero ohm resistor is tied to a pin with power flag Other aspect: Keeping the zero ohm resistor in the schematic will make the DRC at the board run smooth. And if you forgot the resistor accidentially, you will got an error message. :O) With best regards: Bernd Wiebus alias dl1eic Am Sat, 21 Sep 2024 19:14:54 +0200 schrieb "Pierre-Raymond Rondelle via groups.io" <pierreraymondrondelle@...>: John, Robert,-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEceydlAu1Ov6Z3ILE6D4maolCoowFAmbvGRUACgkQ6D4maolC ooxFawf/ZCK6AojJIW478kwpa8gX/cbkjyt3oA6NyJ48Rj9IDjbwqeQUTrQotBTN yx8SHMpRnkuygMU+Eq102g4wsNMfugsk9ASioa9EQ55LtcCkAqtKG7ukRDW8CeZq 5hA/umxrNPBa5A3cEUmXLn79OPz6RHKF+guB1wu9IPYxwZUnhMuHl3FGqJIQagvO b4pyLd+H0d4/E6XOZkkrx70TBrWk2LlnRaLv5gMVVb9seiZX349j68qqpxSed0uH HL9k/5eoB1hV/sL9Hd7cL/5RPlMx8JxyY2ssgT/H786WwUhV/D5qkf0dkJll4ehw HsSlCyL+dNBP0CPojy+B0UNq6U3dgQ== =tKEO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
开云体育Excuse me John, I had not been clear at all. My mistake. Mandatory is in my applications because power lines are the ones that pose me most of the problems in logic boards. My boards are dense, all of them are routed on component side. And I said mandatory because of the net name change between one side and the other of a 0-Ohm strap. In this case if I have to route a line between an IC gnd to the gnd, jumping? over other lines, and use a jumper, the IC side of a the jumper must not change its gnd name and THIS IS a real problem causing conflicts. You may ignore some of the errors but that's quite messy for me. Instead of naming this part as "lnk" or "strap" or "jumper", I probably had to name it "net transfer component". The purposes of this special part were to keep the net name, include this component in the BOM and make the error check happy. In addition it's identified on the electrical drawing.
Just for my information, when you have tested it, please tell me
if it still play a helpful role in the last version of Kicad or if
it's redundant with a new function that I don't yet know. Thks. On 21.09.24 19:24, John Woodgate via
groups.io wrote:
|
开云体育Bernd, Thank you to point this aspect. I didn't even think to the fuse.I save your message it will probably be helpful in the future. Just one question (it makes a while I didn't design a board) :
for example 0-Ohm resistor with a power Input connected to gnd
power line and a power output with a power flag connected to the
Gnd pin of the IC. Shouldn't there be a net name conflict with the
IC gnd and the resistor's output ? And, with a fuse and the same
rationale, wouldn't the ERC cry a bit ? On 21.09.24 21:05, Bernd Wiebus via
groups.io wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hello Pierre-RaymondMandatory for power lines.Same Problem as for fuses. It is not the problem, that you use two nets (numbers will be enough) but for the ERC-Testing, because you end a power line, and the other end of the device is no power line. So the ERC-Test will throw errormessages. Cure for this seems for zero ohm resistors the same as for fuses: Define one pin as power input, so you can connect it to a symbol with power flag, and the outher as power output, so you can connect it to passive pins. Then the ERC will be satisfied. Of course, as for small designs, you can easyly ignore the error messages, as far as you not get confused with real errors. Be aware, there sometimes is a confusion with names. The pin, where the fuse or zero ohm resistor is tied to a pin with power flag Other aspect: Keeping the zero ohm resistor in the schematic will make the DRC at the board run smooth. And if you forgot the resistor accidentially, you will got an error message. :O) With best regards: Bernd Wiebus alias dl1eic Am Sat, 21 Sep 2024 19:14:54 +0200 schrieb "Pierre-Raymond Rondelle via groups.io" <pierreraymondrondelle@...>:John, Robert, Zero Ohms resistors have the drawback to create two nets. I had similar issue some years ago with Kicad 5.20, it didn't have any practical solution for that. So, I cheated, creating symbol and models for keeping the same net name on both sides of the jumper. Mandatory for power lines. My computer being too old, I didn't migrate to newer kicad versions. Consequently, didn't test the trick on post 5.20. But since you're asking the jumper question I assume that this hasn't been solved. Instead, I made a specific component using 3 pads with the same net name, whichever the pad number is. In the middle a square one (thin and long, this is the "jumper wire"), of course not drilled and two round ones at the ends. The 3 pads were? overlapping, establishing a connection in between the ends. For the schematics,I created a dedicated symbol with one terminal, (I named it "lnk"), and filled the attribute table for the BOM. I placed it on a convenient place on the net the jumper is installed, I numbered it. That's all. Refer to the annexed files. Remember it's ver 5.20. You may have to modify it regarding the new version rules. My application was to route a number of different single side PCBs where power lines were routed on component side via jumper wires. Refer to: "Strap footprint.png" & "Strap footprints in use.png" In schema, the symbol was: "Strap symbol for eeschema.png", represented by "Strap Symbols attached to the drawing.png" in the electrical drawing. "My_Straps.pretty.rar" is the strap library model for 3.81 to 22.86 mm long jumpers. And for the PCB I also provide an example "strap_test.rar" (not functional, for decorating your bedroom only ! ). Have fun On 20.09.24 18:49, Tony Casey via groups.io wrote: If you want to use headers and links, I have schematic symbols for those. Perhaps KiCad even has them in one of its extensive library, I don't know.Alternatively, use zero Ohm resistors, and add a text note to say what they are for. Do that, as well for links. If they are multiple position links, add a truth table. I try to put everything on the schematic. That way, nothing gets missed. -- Regards, Tony? On 20 Sep 2024 17:17, John Woodgate <jmw@...> wrote:Thanks, Robert. I suppose they have to be placed in the schematic exactly where they are needed in the layout, which can make the schematic look very odd. On 2024-09-20 16:35, Robert via groups.io wrote: They are normally in the schematic as zero ohm resistors. In thelayout they can be whatever you like, eg pukkka zero ohm resistors (wire-ended or surface mount), hand-cut wire links, blobs of solder, etc. Regards, Robert * Plain text email - safe, readable, inclusive. * -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. --OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying Virus-free.www.avg.com-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEceydlAu1Ov6Z3ILE6D4maolCoowFAmbvGRUACgkQ6D4maolC ooxFawf/ZCK6AojJIW478kwpa8gX/cbkjyt3oA6NyJ48Rj9IDjbwqeQUTrQotBTN yx8SHMpRnkuygMU+Eq102g4wsNMfugsk9ASioa9EQ55LtcCkAqtKG7ukRDW8CeZq 5hA/umxrNPBa5A3cEUmXLn79OPz6RHKF+guB1wu9IPYxwZUnhMuHl3FGqJIQagvO b4pyLd+H0d4/E6XOZkkrx70TBrWk2LlnRaLv5gMVVb9seiZX349j68qqpxSed0uH HL9k/5eoB1hV/sL9Hd7cL/5RPlMx8JxyY2ssgT/H786WwUhV/D5qkf0dkJll4ehw HsSlCyL+dNBP0CPojy+B0UNq6U3dgQ== =tKEO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
开云体育Thank you, Pierre-Raymond. I will try to
answer your question, but it may be long delayed. On 2024-09-21 20:17, Pierre-Raymond
Rondelle via groups.io wrote:
-- OOO - Own Opinions Only Best Wishes John Woodgate Keep trying |
开云体育No matter John! This is to provide more accurate information next time the question emerges. Don't miss Bernd's message, this another way to solve your issue.
On 21.09.24 22:08, John Woodgate via
groups.io wrote:
|