Re: Vida to Path clearance
|
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 18:45, Clemens Koller < cko@...> wrote: Hi!
On 2/1/23 19:01, Alan Pearce via wrote:
...
>> While they use identical pictograms they DO dimension correctly
>> for the dimension they are providing, and if one can't follow the dimension lines ...
I tend to disagree:
Via-to-Track = 0.254mm = PictureX
PTH-to-Track = 0.33mm = same PictureX
NPTH-to-Track = 0.254mm = same PictureX, which, btw. shows a PTH and not a NPTH.
? Well, you could take that annular ring as a keep out, such as one would have for a screw head on a mounting hole, but that is beside the point.
But the point I was making is that even though they show the same pad and track in each picture, they each have a seperate set of dimensioning lines to show what dimension they are referencing, and if people don't understand the way each picture has been dimensioned, how can they understand something as basic as track to track spacing, or even track width.
|
