开云体育

Continuing the conversation, Don responds: “Are you saying that CV 19 would somehow elude the Compare?” Not likely – CV19 is just another location in the decoder to be compared to the data

True. The complete session would be best, but that runs the risk of getting not just one session but the last - many (from the "other" file). You're right, I should have been

Wouter, "salient part" is subject to missing important data. Dave Sand

Erik, You can either do a cut-and-paste of the salient part, or add the file to directory "problemsbeingworkedon" in the file area, following that with the posting of a link to it in this

Erik, Go to "Help -> System Console". Click on the "Copy to clipboard" button and paste into a reply. Dave Sand

Wouter, can you please explain how to post the logfile here so one knows it belongs to this discussion? Thank you Erik

George, Maybe you could put a long going "inactive delay" on block A. Or both if bi-directional. Dave Sand

Dave I think LogixNG would work here. I tried putting a dummy block in between that was constantly occupied but that did not work unsurprisingly. But I'm confused about your third option. I'm already

Ralph, In agreement with the previous posters on this thread, the concept of dynamically removing track seems like something for a bad horror movie.? Really? However, since Sensors and Turnouts are

I like the symmetry of constructors and destructors. I do understand that automatic garbage collection was a primary justification for Java (yet another programming language), and destructors per se

George, If you can use a test release, JMRI 5.11.2 introduced a concept called a ghost block. The allows Dispatcher to simulate a train going through the ghost block. If you are just looking at

Hello folks I've been using JMRI for Operations for about 12 years, with good success, thanks in no small part to this forum.? I operate a windows 10 system computer with JMRI 5.10 with Java 17.? I

I created a nice panel for the museum layout and created train tracking markers on it. It works well except for one show stopping thing. At one spot in the loop there is a detection gap between blocks

George, What I do is use the shift click to added the block contents label (marker) and immediately do a right click to get the right click menu before moving the mouse. Dave Sand

Today I was watch other run trains.... one engineet was going in reverse. Nothing wrong with that, but as the lovomotive travelled, it activated the sensor, and the signal sequence for train going

I found that if I drew a selection box around the invisible marker that it would appear as a tiny yellow box. Then if I right clicked the yellow box a popup menu would appear giving me a couple

Thank you Dave, With what hardware I have (under the table) I'm trying to get the most effect above the table. As switch machines and sensor get installed. the effect will be more

Can I ask why you would want to remove a turnout dynamically?

Erik, Someone might be able to look at this properly if you post the log-file for a session where you can't read a decoder. Meanwhile, it's best to stop re-installing things. It does not help in 99%

Last night I deleted paths and SML, removed/replaced masts and turnouts. After a rebuild it worked correctly. Nothing is obvious comparing the two files but as you imply there was something making the