开云体育

Digitrax won't as it would wipe out the use of transponding, who would bother with such a clumsy system. Also there is the "Not made here" problem, they did not come up with it. NCE probably won't as

Building on Daniel’s suggestion… Let’s say you would like three cassettes that hold 18 cars each (triple your current six). create three staging tracks each long enough to hold 18 cars. Call

Sorry, but that is garbage. You cannot get an instance of an object by requesting the object from its class. It has to be done using the object's manager. The JMRI scripting environments includes

then again chatGPT use code for signal head.... try again. lol

I have a new love now for ChatGPT.... # Import necessary JMRI classes from jmri import SignalHead from jmri import Reporter # Get the SignalHead object for the signal mast signal_mast =

Tom, The question is if the ESU command station will work with JMRI. If it does, then you have something. But I don't recall what level of ESU command station support has been written for JMRI.

Nags, The test still occurs, but the issue is what happens after the test. A related factor is what causes a ConditionNG to execute. With the exception of ConditionalNGs configured to run after

Mark, It takes a special circuit to get added to the booster to allow RailCom to work and then the circuit that would listen for the answers. So it takes a significant change in the booster

Cliff Well said! I am trying to get that point across to my club members. We have a complex Train Controller installation that nobody understands. LogixNG might replace part of it and allow for better

Pay that! I find myself using LogixNG more and more and I did wonder what the overhead was. What does catch me out occasionally is Execute on Change vs. Always Execute. The conditional doesn't execute

In addition to the decoders that Dick mentions, it should also be noted that over the last couple of years Trix have announced a number of locos fitted with decoders that have Railcom capability. I am

Dick, is tjere a Railcom Mail Group? I am curious if there are many Railcom layouts operating with large clubsd and multiple locomotives (10 -15) simultaneously. Dana Zimmerli Z System Designs

Mark, You probably will not read this in MR, so do I dare to publicly post this info about what folks are missing out on here in the US of A? <G> Hopefully it is not too far off topic from the

Yes, ESU decoders support "ordinary RailCom". The "+" part is additional capabilities. RailCom+ (mostly automatic decoder registration with command station) is part of the RailCommunity standards

This is very informative.? I always wondered why the locomotive motor has to turn when reading CVs and why it takes so long. -- Tom

My understanding is that the ESU decoders support RailCom+, which I understand is a proprietary extension of RailCom specific to ESU.? Does this mean that in fact ESU decoders support RailCom as

George, After remaining as a silent observer on this thread, at least one observation seems worth floating. " But I wonder, how does it compare in performance to performing the same tasks in a

Dick, Good point about Railcom and NMRA. As I understand it, Railcom became an RP in 1997 and didn't become a standard until 2012. Even then, the standard underwent extensive revision in 2021. Why

Billybob, Yes, transponding also. But is that another single manufacturer thing? Who else but Digitrax makes decoders with Digitrax transponding? Mark

George, A "bean" is a Java object that has a set of characteristics. In the JMRI, most of the table items, such as turnouts, sensors, etc., are implement as Java beans. Dave Sand