Locked
Digitrax sound decoder
#digitrax
I have a Digitrax system using Version 4.19.5 running on windows 10
One of my locomotives has a DH165LO decoder along with a SFX004 sound
decoder. How do I get Decoder Pro to recognize that this is a
By
Phil Law
·
#173303
·
|
Locked
Re: yard vs classification
#operationspro
Here's a link to the help:
https://www.jmri.org/help/en/package/jmri/jmrit/operations/Operations.shtml#Interchange
Dan
By
Dan Boudreau
·
#173302
·
|
Locked
Re: Can I change the decoder type after I create a entry
Yes thanks I fixed it just wondered if I could change it. Apparently not
would be a nice feature to keep all the metadata and re read the decoder
type like a dup with replace option.
Jamesq
By
Jamos Bond
·
#173301
·
|
Locked
Re: Error on XML File should I be concerned?
Ok tell me when u have it I will update
By
Jamos Bond
·
#173300
·
Edited
|
Locked
Re: Turnouts - individual blocks or part of other blocks
Hi Steve,
Nothing beats hardware detection for switches separately as their own
block. But as Tony said, it will add up moneywise. And in terms of wire. An
alternative is to have the block sensors in
By
whmvd
·
#173299
·
|
Locked
Re: Turnouts - individual blocks or part of other blocks
Dear Steve
My 8x8 layout has almost 40 switches. Do you really want to buy detection units @ over $100.00 per 8 detections using digitrax for all your switches and run all those extra wires. The
By
AD
·
#173298
·
|
Locked
Re: Turnouts - individual blocks or part of other blocks
I'd say in an ideal world they'd be separate blocks but to save on detection I've made mine part of the block to which the toe of the turnout connects. I worked on the basis you couldn't enter that
By
Christopher White
·
#173297
·
|
Locked
Turnouts - individual blocks or part of other blocks
Hi everyone,
With the aim of achieving layout automation either via warrants or dispatcher (rather than purely coding) when designing and laying out the track should turnouts be isolated blocks or
By
SteveM
·
#173296
·
|
Locked
Re: Edit Turnout window does not save the Continuing Route Turnout State
#layouteditor
I found it in my panel file and was able to fix it, but if you could please
address this in the next version.
Thanks!
[email protected]> wrote:
By
Keith Ruberson
·
#173295
·
|
Locked
Edit Turnout window does not save the Continuing Route Turnout State
#layouteditor
Gents,
It appears in JMRI version 4.19.6 that Edit Turnout window does not save the Continuing Route Turnout State when done is selected. I would change it in the xml file if i knew where to
By
Keith Ruberson
·
#173294
·
|
Locked
Re: Error on XML File should I be concerned?
James,
Thanks for finding this. A fix is in the works at https://github.com/JMRI/JMRI/pull/8523.
Dave in Australia
By
Dave Heap
·
#173293
·
|
Locked
Re: Can I change the decoder type after I create a entry
Errors are not? a required action or the rule. Sometimes things go right? and the full CV page is read.
The more complex the decoder, the more possibility of? a ' fail to read'
Marc
By
forfoum@...
·
#173292
·
|
Locked
Re: Can I change the decoder type after I create a entry
You simply used the wrong definition.
Rolling Thunder definition does not have throttle function names simply because it does not use them.? This definition is to be used? to setup the receiver box
By
forfoum@...
·
#173291
·
|
Locked
yard vs classification
#operationspro
How does OpPro differently use yard tracks and classification tracks?
Michael Boyle
By
Michael Boyle
·
#173289
·
|
Locked
Re: Getting an Error 308 on new setup.
#digitrax
#pr4
Royce,
In addition to Marc's suggestion to update to a newer version of JMRI, if you're trying to use the PR4 as a stand-alone programmer you should get rid of the PTB-100. It's not needed with the
By
Breezlys
·
#173288
·
|
Locked
Re: Getting an Error 308 on new setup.
#digitrax
#pr4
JMRI 3.10 is rather dated.
The Digitrax PR4, contrary o the PR3, prefers Direct Byte mode while the PR3 worked when in Paged mode.? Changes were added to later versions of JMRI regarding this
By
forfoum@...
·
#173287
·
|
Locked
Re: Classification yards
#operationspro
The car has to be on a C/I track for the restriction to be in place.? Look at your C/I tracks, and those cars could have restrictions on them. Again, don't use them and you won't have an
By
Dan Boudreau
·
#173286
·
|
Locked
Re: Error on XML File should I be concerned?
Bob,
Found the problem:
In 2019 I changed functionLabels and soundlabels from fixed-length arrays to HashMaps to allow for planned expansions. But I forgot to update "locomotive-config.xsd" to
By
Dave Heap
·
#173285
·
|
Locked
Re: Error on XML File should I be concerned?
James and Bob,
I'm not seeing this problem at all with HEAD of Master.
Sound Labels 33 and 34 are valid in the code, needed for the decoder definition and are loading fine for
By
Dave Heap
·
#173284
·
|
Locked
Re: Classification yards
#operationspro
Phil
By any chance do you know how jmri marks a car to prevent it from being picked up by a train using the same route that dropped it off. Is there a way for me to examine my car database or other
By
AD
·
#173283
·
|