开云体育

Nick, One trick people have used for masts when the next thing is an end of track buffer is a signal that only has stop enabled. Then whatever points at it would figure approach at best. For your case

Hi Klaus Thanks for your response in the previous post, Here's some feedback: Awesome !!? I got that going pretty quickly in my study on my Windows laptop, changed a few settings and tidied up my

On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 04:53 PM, Dave wrote: > > Folks, > On re-reading this thread, I've noticed that MQTT software libraries for > the small devices that will probably be commonly used in our

Thanks Ken, I've never done anything (on my layout) by following "rules". <grin> For my friend's sake, I will try. I have no concept what rules we need. He is not doing a rivet-counter signaling

Thanks Greg, The explanation is clear and simple. I will give my friend the assist in doing it.? One question; what if there is no "next" signal ? We are just starting his signaling and he only has a

Mark, I notice in your log file that you have a 'no acknowledge from locomotive' message. This is the same problem that my friend is having with his PR4. Like you we tried the Digitrax SoundLoader and

Nick, The biggest issue people have with masts is the masts want to follow the rules. Doing things 'with modeler license' are not so easy. The concept is you build the one mast by telling it which is

A serial link, with JMRI thinking its talking to a C/MRI system and your hardware-control PC emulating a C/MRI system, will work for Turnouts and Sensor. But it won’t work for throttle control from

Thanks, Bob. I'm a little closer to understanding. All of your reply was clear, until the final question about two serial links to the PC. Does C/MRI always and only use a serial link to the computer?

Andy, The problem with my DCS-51 is it will not allow me to Program anything.? I discovered this when it wouldn't allow me to program anything. Mark DeSchane

If you truly want to create a simple ABS signal system with PRR signals, the easiest would be to use signal mast logic.? You have already done the hard part of building the signal head in JMRI.?

This isn't a JMRI issue but an ID naming issue on your part. Gerry has already suggest one way to do it. -- Peter Ulvestad JMRI Users Group Moderator - http://www.jmri.org ( http://www.jmri.org ) Tam

?????? I do a lot of installs for others so it is not unusual to get locos with the same number. My method of assigning the file name would be in your case:- NYC 4301 MRL 4301 I then have the owners

Running 4.15.1 loaded just fine.? Using SPROG IIv3 and noticed that the throttle speed control has changed.? It works OK, is just different.? Is this normal? ??? Also the lights changed on the

I have many locomotives with proper road numbers that overlap with others. For example, I have a Kato NYC PA unit with the number of 4301, but I also have a Kato SD70ACE in MRL with the same number.?

Hi Morgan, I'm new here too and had the same question (but only in my head). I discovered that one of my my new locos doesn't have it's decoder listed in the JMRI database yet so that right there is

Hello Mark (Deschane??), First, let me apologize for hijacking (or at very least, misdirecting) your thread. I felt like we may have had similar issues but it now seems I have confused your discussion

Hi Nick, It sounds like the way you might want to go is defining your own (signalmast) signalling system. I know that sounds daunting, but even I was able to do that quite quickly; I derived a system

Hi Bob, Re 1) Not only did I think that was the way to do it, I was also (and am still) just building my 'library of tricks' to use in the proper, big script later on. This is one of the stages of

Thanks Bob, It has been a long time since I worked on a signaling project. I was not aware of the ability to disable aspects. in masts. Since I have not worked with them , I wanted to sty with what I