Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Jmriusers
- Messages
Search
Locked
Re: Build fail…Not using off spots or holding cars
#operationspro
Dan,
?
I thought that if the spur was full, program checked for yard track in the same location.
?
In the build report excerpt below (from my friend's layout), a custom empty <MTY> (out of staging) cannot be sent to the target spur due to the track being full (edited to bold highlight), but then is assigned to a yard track (also bold) in the same location...<additional info : this spur's schedule is set to use only 100% from staging>
? ?Generate load for (ATSF 181642) type (Hop_LSnd) empty (E) at (ATSF_Denver-(stage, S. Denver/Trk 2) destination ()? ? ? Spur (MINTURN (Lower Yd), Minturn Yard-(Box_Insl) schedule (SLC <Sugar+Metal+CGds>) doesn't service type (Hop_LSnd)? ? ? Spur (CF&I Mill, CF&I Mill-limestone) schedule (CF&I<lime>) doesn't service type (Hop_LSnd)? ? ? Spur (MONARCH, Tipple) schedule (MONARCH<gravity>) doesn't service type (Hop_LSnd)? ? ? Spur (MP_Kansas City, Neff Yard) schedule (MP Neff) doesn't service type (Hop_LSnd)? ? ? Spur (ATSF_PUEBLO, Fuel Track) schedule (ATSF <fuel>) doesn't service type (Hop_LSnd)? ? ? Spur (Leadville, Leadville Yd-(AS&R shops) schedule (LDV <AS&R>) doesn't service type (Hop_LSnd) ? ? Try spur (Newton, SandCreek Yd-(RR Stores Trk) custom load (MTY)? ? ? Train (ATSF #413) can transport car (ATSF 181642) from staging (ATSF_Denver-(stage, S. Denver/Trk 2) to (Newton, SandCreek Yd-(RR? ? ? Stores Trk)? ? ? Route for car (ATSF 181642): (ATSF_Denver-(stage, S. Denver/Trk 2)-> (ATSF #413)-> (Newton, SandCreek Yd-(RR Stores Trk)? ? ? Can't use spur (Newton, SandCreek Yd-(RR Stores Trk) for (ATSF 181642) due to rolling stock length 40 feet, track length 165? ? ? feet, available track space 13 feet? ? ? Track (SandCreek Yd-(RR Stores Trk) full, searching for a yard at destination (Newton)? ? ? Can't use yard (Caboose) due to type (Hop_LSnd)? ? ? Can't use yard (SandCreek Yd(Recv)) due to type (Hop_LSnd)? ? ? Sending car (ATSF 181642) to yard (SandCreek Yd(MTYs)) at destination (Newton)? ? ?Car (ATSF 181642) custom load (MTY) final destination (Newton, SandCreek Yd-(RR Stores Trk)? ? ? Car (ATSF 181642) load (MTY) has assigned destination (Newton, SandCreek Yd(MTYs))? ? Car (ATSF 181642) assigned to train, destination (Newton, SandCreek Yd(MTYs))? ?
The car then sits in the yard-type track with the tag to be moved on into the spur when space opens up.
?
This follows what I thought the Help file lays out under the section on "Alternate Track"...
Have I stumbled across a glitch in the matrix?? Or am I missing a variable?
?
Happy to help, hope it helps,
<Pete Johnson>
|
开云体育Ermanno, This feature will be included in the next test version JMRI 5.9.5 and the next production release 5.10. The next test release 5.9.5 is about to be released in a week or
two and it would be very good if you could install it and check
that it works as you want. Daniel
On 2024-10-07 06:43, Ermanno V wrote:
|
Locked
Re: Digitrax DN147A0 definition for DecoderPro...
#definitions
#digitrax
Bob, this worked! Still have to fine tune the motor but this gets one annoying thing off the list.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks, Tim -----Original Message-----
From: jmriusers@groups.io <jmriusers@groups.io> On Behalf Of Timothy P. Alder Jr. via groups.io Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 8:42 AM To: jmriusers@groups.io Subject: Re: [jmriusers] Digitrax DN147A0 definition for DecoderPro... Thanks Bob, was thinking it might have been related to BEMF and didn’t consider the transponding, will give it a shot later today. Tim -----Original Message----- From: jmriusers@groups.io <jmriusers@groups.io> On Behalf Of Bob Jacobsen via groups.io Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 8:36 AM To: jmriusers@groups.io Subject: Re: [jmriusers] Digitrax DN147A0 definition for DecoderPro... This headlight behavior might be part of how Digitrax transponding works. Perhaps there’s a way to turn transponding off in the decoder if you’re not using it? Bob On Oct 7, 2024, at 8:31?PM, Timothy P. Alder Jr. via groups.io <tim.alder@...> wrote:— Bob Jacobsen rgj1927@... |
Locked
Re: Build fail…Not using off spots or holding cars
#operationspro
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:46 PM, Pete Johnson wrote:
Dan can confirm perhaps...?The number of cars with custom loads from staging is controlled by the "Percentage of custom loads generated from staging" feature.? The default is 100% which means only send what the spur can hold.? If you want additional cars to use the alternate / off spot or yard tracks at the location, you need to demand more cars from either staging or from industries on the layout. ?
Consider if the "Percentage of custom loads generated from staging" feature didn't exist.? For example a spur that needs boxcars, if there was a dozen boxcars departing staging they all could go to a spur that held only one car, and that could overload any "off-spot" or yard near by.? The feature prevents overloading an industry and the industry's yards that need custom loads out of staging.
?
Note that I've used the words "custom loads out of staging" when describing the program's behavior. Cars out of staging with default loads "E" or "L" behave differently.? The program can send cars with default loads to a spur's alternate track if the spur's track was full. It doesn't matter if the car was departing staging or any other type of track.
?
Dan |
Locked
Re: Build fail…Not using off spots or holding cars
#operationspro
On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 04:09 AM, Joe Z. wrote:
I guess I was thinking that the program would just build and send the loads to the off spot until space becomes available at the final destination.Joe, ?
I believe this can occur if your off-spot track is located in the same location as the target track and is a "yard"-type track.
So, something like...
Location: Dunn Papermill
? ?Track : "Kaolin Holds" <track type=Yard>
? ? ? Length = 88' <2 cars>
This should allow extra (up to 2) cars to flow to Dunn and await room on T4-C.??
(And it need not be a separate physical track, maybe just use the extra track length between the turnout and the unload area for the kaolin tanks.)
?
Dan can confirm perhaps...?
?
Happy to help, hope it helps,
<Pete Johnson> |
Locked
Re: Operations: consists and turns
#operationspro
On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 09:24 PM, Paul Anderson wrote:
Ok, so if I manually create (via the Ops Pro user interface) a named loco consist, does that consist get pushed down to the connected command station (whatever hardware), or does the named loco consist do nothing unless I manually create the same arrangement using my DCC throttles? Hey Paul.
?
As far as I can tell, and perhaps Dan can confirm, the help file confirms only NCE-capability for now,
?
And I wanted to add a thought to your idea expressed earlier,
In TT&TO, crews are sometimes looking for a specific engine number, but some railroad's rules do not require that loco to be the leading loco in an actual consist, just that is has on it's number lights.? So, if the lead loco has extinguished number boards and the trail unit has them on, the ID of the train can be the same, even if the loco is trail.? For our tiny trains, the throttle can run the loco backwards, making the consist operate with the #789 loco in the lead, but "indicated" reverse travel on throttle.? Not many of us probably look at the throttle direction indicator anyway, since if it doesn't move correctly when we start out, we just hit the direction button and Voila!? And if the branch is dead end, then it might be intuitive to think of "backing up" to get home as well.... just thoughts.
?
Happy to help, hope it helps,
<Pete Johnson>
|
Locked
Re: Another way of adding roster media images without drag and drop?
#rosterimage
“You're right, exporting a roster entry only exports the regular data in a xml file, images and icons are not exported, but their pathes are, and they're relative, so you could somehow synchronize the folders where the media are stored, and they will show up.”
Would it possibly be a sensible future enhancement for a roster entry export to, optionally, include everything?? |
Locked
Re: Another way of adding roster media images without drag and drop?
#rosterimage
I can’t but help being amazed at the speed of response to my original query, thanks :)
?
? |
Locked
Re: Another way of adding roster media images without drag and drop?
#rosterimage
Hi;
?
You're right, exporting a roster entry only exports the regular data in a xml file, images and icons are not exported, but their pathes are, and they're relative, so you could somehow synchronize the folders where the media are stored, and they will show up.
?
Regards;
Lionel |
Locked
Re: Another way of adding roster media images without drag and drop?
#rosterimage
Code has been , feature will be in next release. .
?
Lionel |
Locked
Re: Layout panel update issue
#layouteditor
That's it. Thanks you Dave. JeanLouisDelestre@... De: "Dave Sand" <ds@...> ?: jmriusers@groups.io 贰苍惫辞测é: Mardi 8 Octobre 2024 17:09:10 Objet: Re: [jmriusers] Layout panel update issue Make sure the Layout Editor "Options -> Use Direct Turnout Control" menu item is NOT selected. ?This option used the left and right mouse buttons to change the turnout position. Dave Sand ----- Original message ----- From: Jean-Louis Free <jeanlouisdelestre@...> Subject: [jmriusers] Layout panel update issue Date: Tuesday, October 08, 2024 9:54 AM Hi, When I click on a turnout in the turnout table, the layout panel is correctly updated.? ? But when I click on the turnout in the? layout panel, it doesn't upade neither send the appropriate DCCC command.? It keep sending a close command, and the screen is like this (showing not trown or closed) : ? ? ? ? Any idea ? -- Jean-Louis Paris-France ? JRMI 5.8 on Windows DCC EX? on Arduino Mega Java version 17.1.12 ? ? ? ? ? -- Jean-Louis Paris-France
?
JRMI 5.8 on Windows
DCC EX? on Arduino Mega
Java version 17.1.12
? |
Locked
Re: Layout panel update issue
#layouteditor
Make sure the Layout Editor "Options -> Use Direct Turnout Control" menu item is NOT selected. ?This option used the left and right mouse buttons to change the turnout position. Dave Sand ----- Original message ----- From: Jean-Louis Free <jeanlouisdelestre@...> Subject: [jmriusers] Layout panel update issue Date: Tuesday, October 08, 2024 9:54 AM Hi, When I click on a turnout in the turnout table, the layout panel is correctly updated.? ? But when I click on the turnout in the? layout panel, it doesn't upade neither send the appropriate DCCC command.? It keep sending a close command, and the screen is like this (showing not trown or closed) : ? ? ? ? Any idea ? -- Jean-Louis Paris-France ? JRMI 5.8 on Windows DCC EX? on Arduino Mega Java version 17.1.12 ? ? ? ? ? |
Locked
Layout panel update issue
#layouteditor
Hi,
?
When I click on a turnout in the turnout table, the layout panel is correctly updated.?
?
But when I click on the turnout in the? layout panel, it doesn't upade neither send the appropriate DCCC command.? It keep sending a close command, and the screen is like this (showing not trown or closed) :
?
?
?
?
Any idea ?
--
Jean-Louis Paris-France
?
JRMI 5.8 on Windows
DCC EX? on Arduino Mega
Java version 17.1.12
?
?
?
? ? |
Locked
Re: Digitrax N scale DN147K1C decoder.
#definitions
#digitrax
开云体育Peter Ulvestad has fixed this so the decoders DN147* will be included in the next test release JMRI 5.9.5 and the next production release JMRI 5.10.
Daniel On 2024-10-08 02:26, n_trains wrote:
|
Locked
Re: Digitrax N scale DN147K1C decoder.
#definitions
#digitrax
Many thanks to all that gave their opinion on the matter.
?
Regads, Harry |
Locked
Re: Digitrax N scale DN147K1C decoder.
#definitions
#digitrax
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 04:06 AM, danielb987 wrote:
Daniel, For Digitrax decoders, the K1C (or A0 and others) are form factors of the decoders to fit different models or connectors. They all have the same firmware. The issue we have here is Digitrax has reused the DN147 which was used years ago based on their naming conventions and the new DN147 have different firmware. The naming convention is broken down here: -- Peter Ulvestad JMRI Users Group Moderator ( ) Tam Valley Group Moderator ( ) Sprog-DCC Group Moderator ( ) Edmonton Model Railroad Association ( ) |
Locked
Re: Digitrax DN147A0 definition for DecoderPro...
#definitions
#digitrax
Thanks Bob, was thinking it might have been related to BEMF and didn’t consider the transponding, will give it a shot later today.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Tim -----Original Message-----
From: jmriusers@groups.io <jmriusers@groups.io> On Behalf Of Bob Jacobsen via groups.io Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 8:36 AM To: jmriusers@groups.io Subject: Re: [jmriusers] Digitrax DN147A0 definition for DecoderPro... This headlight behavior might be part of how Digitrax transponding works. Perhaps there’s a way to turn transponding off in the decoder if you’re not using it? Bob On Oct 7, 2024, at 8:31?PM, Timothy P. Alder Jr. via groups.io <tim.alder@...> wrote:— Bob Jacobsen rgj1927@... |
Locked
Re: Digitrax DN147A0 definition for DecoderPro...
#definitions
#digitrax
This headlight behavior might be part of how Digitrax transponding works. Perhaps there’s a way to turn transponding off in the decoder if you’re not using it?
Bob On Oct 7, 2024, at 8:31?PM, Timothy P. Alder Jr. via groups.io <tim.alder@...> wrote:— Bob Jacobsen rgj1927@... |
Locked
Re: Digitrax N scale DN147K1C decoder.
#definitions
#digitrax
开云体育Same boat different thread. I’ve submitted an “Issue” for the family of DN147xx decoders on JMRI Github this morning. ? HTH, Tim ? From: jmriusers@groups.io <jmriusers@groups.io> On Behalf Of danielb987 via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 6:07 AM To: jmriusers@groups.io Subject: Re: [jmriusers] Digitrax N scale DN147K1C decoder. ? Harry, The only decoder I can find is Digitrax DN147. I don't know the difference between it and DN147K1C. One option is to open an Issue on GitHub, requesting that decoder to be added to JMRI. Daniel On 2024-10-08 02:26, n_trains wrote:
|
Locked
Re: Digitrax N scale DN147K1C decoder.
#definitions
#digitrax
The DN147 currently shown in DecoderPro is the model which became redundant in 2002. ?DN147K1C's are the 2024 variant which have a version number of 204 from memory.
I think it's unfortunate that Digitrax is essentially recycling an old designation and causing a bit of confusion. |