开云体育

Was reaching for straws hoping that MRC would do it. I remember seeing ACC in the programming scheme in the? MRC Prodigy and thought it was for Accessory. So, I set the Prodigy up and found.....

I felt the same because I'm using a Gaugemaster (MRC) as a loco control with BDL168 track sensors. so I put a 1k resistor in line. If there's to much current going through then the resistor will blow.

I found the best thing is to take the plung into Python. That’s the base with the Raspberry, as there is Thonny Python IDE which is right in the the OS. There is a version difference between JMRI

I am making good progress on my layout development, and today added 16 sensor points from two Lenz LR101 Feedback Modules. I have noted that action at the feedback modules is appropriately indicated

Steve G. I have been thinking about your approach. I failed trying to do something similar in principle with issuing the throttle command to the DS64 hoping it would re broadcast it over

Steve G, Isn't that rather risky? You are placing track power on a low current line. Inobu

Yes, the best way to set it up is to start with only the LT1 hanging off the PR3 port. It will show you what is what. Inobu

Learned from the Economi that current Soundtraxx production does not like a Powerpax - never get a read acknowledge confirmation. Did try it, tho. No joy. Roger Thomas

Hi Howard To configure a BDL168 without a digitrax CS/Throttle. Useing a handy dandy loconet breakout cable, we all have one dont we? Connect you track from your command station to the rail sync

Bob, I see that you have created a folder for yourself. However, you added the system console text to the folder's description. You need to edit the folder and remove the description. In order to

Howard, That is what I meant by the hobby is full of rabbit holes. A particular investment can confine you to one type of layout modeling. To overcome that confinement you end up purchase another

Skip Like Frank, Dan and I suggested, and due to how many things could be affecting the lack of car movement as to how you "thought" the cars would move, you really need to look at the build report

Ted, The recommendation that makes sense to me is to assign forward/reverse based on direction of travel. For a point to point layout I use left to right as forward. For a circular layout clockwise

Even though the TSU2 decoders are not suppose to need a booster, have you tried with it inline? -- Peter Ulvestad JMRI Users Group Moderator - https://www.jmri.org ( http://www.jmri.org ) Tam

My home system is Digitrax with a RR-Circuits interface with a Win 7 computer running JMRI. Also have a PowerPax that I can switch in or out of the programming circuit. (Out for the TSUs.) I have two

Steve G., To focus on the area of concern, I shortened the Table of Entry Points, but maybe too short. Here is a slightly expanded table: Block Entering From Entry Block Direction IB1 (east) IB11

Colin it incredible that Digitrax have made this so difficult. Sadly I’ve got the BDL168s now with three installed and three more ready to go. So I’m very much stuck with these. min liaising with

Russell, It sounds like you're well versed in what's needed. So, you're probably well aware of the need for balancing the charges in the cells of those LiPo batteries. Some who read these messages may

Seems unlikely. JMRI ships its parser with it, and it’s the same in the Mac, Linux and Windows installs. If you look at the file from the command line with `head` or `less`, does it have the right

Matt, By the way FYI, both Bob and I use Mac. Dave in Australia