Locked
Re: Test Release 4.13.4 Timetable tool
#timetable-tool
Paul, Thanks to your question, I found a bug in the scale update process. With a 4:1 fast clock, the scale mile for N(160) is 8.25 feet, while 148 is 8.92 feet. One of the sample trains takes 2h25m at
By
Dave Sand
·
#153662
·
|
Locked
Can't get Web Server to work
JMRI on Windows 10 with Gaugemaster Prodigy Advance [MRC] on COM3 works OK controlling from PC and WiThrottle on a tablet {Android 4.4.2] and mobile phone [Android 6] on 192.168.2.3. However when I
By
Harry Rigby
·
#153661
·
|
Locked
Re: Layout Editor vs Control/Panel Editor
I don't know if you saw and understood one of Ken Cameron's points.? I have a "wide" layout diagram which would not fir on one screen but it was not deep.? So I put the "right hand" half under the
By
Iain
·
#153660
·
|
Locked
Re: Layout Editor vs Control/Panel Editor
Ken, Thanks. Will experiment with the edge connector. I panel is about three screens wide so I will need three or maybe four separate panels to get the job done. I think my challenge will be the
By
Paul Davidson
·
#153659
·
|
Locked
Re: Test Release 4.13.4 Timetable tool
#timetable-tool
Dave, That's useful. ?Will the revised scale setting process allow for British N at 1:148? ?It would be nice but not essential as I doubt the difference from 1:160 will be too problematic. Sorry if
By
paul@...
·
#153658
·
|
Locked
Re: Layout Editor vs Control/Panel Editor
Paul D, The item that links the panels is the edge connector. It is like a normal anchor point, but lets you tell it where there is the next panel and edge connector. It must be a block boundary. I've
By
Ken Cameron
·
#153657
·
|
Locked
Re: Dispatcher - SML - auto-allocation problem
Nevermind.. Found a new bug. There's a on-off situation that happens where a train in block 41 is waiting to allocate across the crossover, and a train in block 07 wants to allocate to block 41 and
By
Mitchell
·
#153656
·
|
Locked
Re: Dispatcher - SML - auto-allocation problem
Hi Steve IT WORKS! had to do a few sensor-delay logix to make it really smooth and reliable going across smaller sections thar have multiple possible routes, but it's become quite solid! Been running
By
Mitchell
·
#153655
·
|
Locked
Re: Layout Editor vs Control/Panel Editor
Ken, I am using a 15" touch screen laptop for a display so I can trigger the turnouts so a larger monitor in a fixed location is not a preference for me. Similarly, if I zoom out to see the whole
By
Paul Davidson
·
#153654
·
|
Locked
Re: Layout Editor vs Control/Panel Editor
Paul D, You do have a number of choices. Ideas include: 1. Resize the LE panel. You can zoom in or out. So you could shrink it. 2. Larger monitors are available. 3. You can 'chain' multiple panels and
By
Ken Cameron
·
#153653
·
|
Locked
Re: NCE fastclock as master to JMRI fastclock
Firstly to David, no Craig and I didn't get it to work to our complete satisfaction. We did have a kind of workaround but it really wasn't anything we would advertise as being a success. Secondly to
By
gmbeal1969
·
#153652
·
|
Locked
Layout Editor vs Control/Panel Editor
I have already built a control panel for my entire layout on Layout Editor. It works. This currently meets my immediate need for a layout control panel since I do not have or plan? to build any
By
Paul Davidson
·
#153651
·
|
Locked
Re: Test release 4.13.4 issue with withrottle
Grit City, when having issues with WiThrottle clients, the first test should be to open a JMRI Throttle Window and try and run the loco from there. That helps split the problem in half, by identifying
By
Steve Todd
·
#153650
·
|
Locked
Re: NCE light it as signal decoder
Adding 4 will work, but obviously you can't access signal addresses 1-4, mor those at the top end. Building your signal mast by using already-defined DCC Signal Heads (with the offset in) is a better
By
Dave Heap
·
#153649
·
|
Locked
Re: Operations - help on controlling car movement
Hello. Could this be made an option for those that want to include ¡°Crew¡± as the load. THANK YOU. :>)....Have a good day.....Frank
By
frankjoanw <upitrr@...>
·
#153648
·
|
Locked
Re: Test Release 4.13.4 Timetable tool
#timetable-tool
Paul, The only data impact is that the scale setting process changed which will result in 4.13.4 data being forced to HO when loaded using 4.13.5 or later. Dave Sand
By
Dave Sand
·
#153647
·
|
Locked
Re: Test Release 4.13.4 Timetable tool
#timetable-tool
Dave, Thanks. ?Will the structural changes impact any timetable data I create with the 4.13.4 ?version of the tool? Regards Paul
By
paul@...
·
#153646
·
|
Locked
Re: Test Release 4.13.4 Timetable tool
#timetable-tool
Paul, The script will be included in the 4.13.5 test release. Due to internal structural changes, the 4.13.5 script will not work with 4.13.4. The latest development release does include the updated
By
Dave Sand
·
#153645
·
|
Locked
Re: Test release 4.13.4 issue with withrottle
Thanks for the tip. I'll change that when I get back. I am certain it is at the default right now.
By
gritcityrailroad@...
·
#153644
·
|
Locked
Test Release 4.13.4 Timetable tool
#timetable-tool
I've just started playing with this and it looks potentially really useful. ?According to the help page there's a sample script?*TimeTable.py* to show how to open the manager and navigate the
By
paul@...
·
#153643
·
|