开云体育

I use BBEdit on my M1. Way .... waaaaaaay ... down the end file I cloned the panel, changed name, checked it out on an new PanelPro session. Success! Thanks! -- Ken NYNH&H, Old Colony Division, Cape

This strictly not true. Signalling does not rely on sections at all! I have three layouts without 'Section's that have been running for up to 8 plus years under JMRI... Regards, Billybob

while i don't know double-slips, my thinking is, i believe, generic to signal mast logic in general. Perhaps. it depends on one's track arrangement. If a double-slip affects a route which enters

That sounds like a dispatcher message and likely a hang over from SSL. SML is really section based, with a section going from one mast to next. Switchs don't have exit signals so you always have 2

The cited doc is dated as Rev C 5/21, 2 years ago. Regards

What you describe is what I'd expect to see. With MQTT, the report will only change if the reporting hardware sends a new message indicating the section is empty. That's a decision you need to take

Hi, I'm planning the next stage of track on my layout and am considering some double slips. I'm guessing that the recommended approach from a JMRI point of view would be for any double slips, and

Hi Pete, It sounds like I need to get to running some Trains to see how all of this works. I will get back to you with a progress report when I get this going. One question I do have. When I get back

What decoder to get has nothing to do with JMRI and needs to be taken to a general DCC forum. -- Peter Ulvestad JMRI Users Group Moderator ( https://www.jmri.org ) Tam Valley Group Moderator (

The 6:09:26 is sorted by Name ?6:09:54 by Description. A case of almost and not at all. And the ordering is consistent. Thanks! -=m=-

The location and date are correct for the tag in the ID Tags table. There is no last message in the Reporter table (it and the current message get cleared after a brief interval -- to short to verify

I ran a couple of tests: 1) with my test RFID reader (I only have one reader for this test, and only one car to test with), the Reporters window added the reporter and showed the tag briefly I saw

Ok thanks for the update.

Jerry Which level are we talking about. — Not sure what you mean. In ID Tags table is the location correct for a tag? (Where and when last seen) — Yes In the reporter tables is the last message

Are any sound decoders "drop in" for DCC READY locos? I understand that the speaker needs to be mounted and wired in.

It has not been discussed, but the newest run of Athearn RTR SD40s have a TSU2 board instead of Econami. Because this is a new release, JMRI has not been updated yet. I had experienced this with the

Jerry Which level are we talking about. In ID Tags table is the location correct for a tag? (Where and when last seen) In the reporter tables is the last message correct? This can be changed to

I see the behavior with Rfid Connection, selected ?“MERG Concentrator” [actually sending messages via sketch on ESP32 emulating MERG Concentrator; JMRI RFID monitor shows correct messages

I tried this sequence of LocoNet messages: [D0 21 11 7D 03 61] Transponder address 3 (short) (or long address 16003) present at LR146 () (BDL16x Board ID 10 RX4 zone A). [D0 21 11 02 01 1C]

Bob - forgive my imprecise timing: ?on closer inspection, the Reporter clears after 2 seconds. Interestingly, the associated sensor goes back to inactive in approx 1 second (I don’t have an olympic