Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Ic7000
- Messages
Search
Re: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000
Alex Netherton
Lots of people use amps, but you have to figure; 3dB (deciBel) is about the lowest amount of gain that can be heard by the human ear (some say 6), and to get 3 dB you have to double your power. To come up one S-unit on the S meter, you need 6 dB. The lowest power increase you should consider is 500 or 600 Watts, because, think; from 100 (7K's power) to 200 is 3 dB - your 250 watts will not be enough to be heard - from 200 to 400 is another 3 dB. From 400 to 600 is about 1 and a half. So for 600 watts, your gain has gone up 7? dB from barefoot! Not bad, and will get you slightly above an S-unit, often enough to be heard above the noise level, or maybe above that annoying carrier when you are trying for a DX station. Now, just for edification, to get a 10 dB increase, you have to increase your power 10 times, meaning you need to go up from 100 watts to 1000 watts. 10 dB will get you 3 S-units. However, your 2 S-units from your 600 watts is going to do the job over 98% of the time, and and the other 2% is just not worth it.Alex Netherton On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:14 AM, BT Yahoo!?2013 <robert.farey@...> wrote:
|
Re: [IC-7000] Safe RTTY Output??
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýPersonally, for heavy contest work, I'd suggest keeping output using RTTY (or other data modes) at the 25-30 Watt level as a maximum.
? * * * * * * * * * * * * 73 - Mac, K2GKK/5 * * (Since 30 Nov 53) * * Oklahoma City, OK * * USAF, Ret (61-81) * * * * * * * * * * * * ? ? ? To: ic7000@... From: mark@... Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:24:51 -0800 Subject: [IC-7000] Safe RTTY Output?? ? I'm planning on playing around with NAQP RTTY contest next month. I know the general rule of thumb for 100% duty cycle modes is to reduce output 50%. Is this a safe output for the 7K? Should it by less/more? ? 73 - Mark Schoonover - KA6WKE Website: Resume: Stack Exchange eBooks: ? |
Re: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000
brian mackey
I don?t think the posters question was about the politics/pricing of owning
an amp, it was, as seen below. As odd as it sounds, people want what they want, even if it does not make perfect sense. New member today. Anyone running a linear amp with the 7000? Would like to run it up to 250 watts - not finding much on the internet specific to myissue. Brian Mackey KC1MAC/AG Hams don't let hams get stuck on 2 meter repeaters! From: BT Yahoo!?2013 <robert.farey@...> Reply-To: <ic7000@...> Date: Friday, January 10, 2014 at 9:14 AM To: <ic7000@...> Subject: Re: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000 Hi Brian the difference is about 2 s points so why bother. there are some amplifiers out there which can be adapted like the furuno marine hf power amplifier. having accqired one it seems an like awful idea to to use it for the small difference it could make. costing some 2500 dollars us. Not that i paid that for it but it does make me think it needs to be used for it's intended purpose. Best regards robert G6LLP From: brian mackey <brian.mackey@...> To: ic7000@... Sent: Friday, 10 January 2014, 12:15 Subject: Re: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000 Yes I use the ameritron 811hd Brian Mackey KC1MAC/AG Hams don't let hams get stuck on 2 meter repeaters! From: <esmorrison1@...> Reply-To: <ic7000@...> Date: Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 8:02 PM To: <ic7000@...> Subject: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000 New member today. Anyone running a linear amp with the 7000? Would like to run it up to 250 watts - not finding much on the internet specific to myissue. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References
Charles Scott
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýJim & All:It really doesn't have to be that expensive. Assuming there's going to be protectors for all the lines anyway, the only other things that are needed are a few ground rods and some wire for the ground field and the Single Point Ground panel. That can be as simple as some copper flashing available at your local roofing supply mounted on a piece of wood. Other than that, it's all things you're going to have anyway. These articles appear to be pretty good. They do show the Single Point Ground concept, which is the best things to bring away from reading these. What they don't seem to talk about is limiting energy transfer on the cables from the tower to the entrance. This is something that's not generally employed in commercial installations (for various reasons), but I think can be a big help for home ham installs. Chuck - N8DNX On 1/10/2014 9:19 AM, J Chaloupka
wrote:
|
Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References
Bob Brooks
Let's assume one has the perfect (whatever that means) antenna lightning protection and has to leave the shack for a period of time and there are predicted thunderstorms for the area, Is it best to leave equipment plugged in or unplugged?Does taking the equipment off the system negate the whole thing or is it better to leave it in and let the system work? On Friday, January 10, 2014 9:19 AM, J Chaloupka
wrote:
?
There is no easy answer, much reading and work are involved for a proper ground, to say nothing of the $$$ cost. ?Don't forget the maxim, "Pay me now or pay me later, but your going to pay", applies here. Here are some links for your reading: de, wd8qbq, JIM From: brian mackey To: ic7000@... Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 7:28 AM Subject: Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References
?
Should the radials be buried as well or just spread out in a direction
away from the house Brian Mackey KC1MAC/AG Hams don't let hams get stuck on 2 meter repeaters! From: Reply-To: <ic7000@...> Date: Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 9:07 PM To: Subject: Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References Brian, I agree that approach has several problems, which are easily corrected. Without knowing the details of how long the coax, ground wires, etc. it is hard to quantify the degree of the problem. 1. A single ground rod can easily saturate the surrounding ground, at which point the charge remaining on the coax continues on directly to the radio. 2. Since the radio is connected to a separate ground rod, which is at a low earth potential (assuming it is some distance from the antenna's ground rod), all of the remaining current on the coax flows through the radio or tuner chassis en route to the "radio" ground rod. 3. It is likely the coax entering the structure will have a high enough voltage on the shield to arc over to nearby objects during an average strike of 18,000 amps and 2 microsecond rise time. Even outside, the coax can arc over to nearby objects, creating pinholes ( or worse) in the outer jacket, allowing water in. To correct the problem: 1. Move the lightning suppressor to the ground strip near the shack (assuming it is outside, if not add one outside). This will divert any induced charges generated by a nearby strike that couple into the coax from bypassing the suppressor. 2. Use a bulkhead barrel connector where the lightning suppressor was originally, to ground the coax shield. Mount it to a copper or stainless steel bracket clamped to the first ground rod. 3. Connect the two ground rods with a #6 bare copper wire, buried 6" or as deep as possible. This will reduce the dynamic surge impedance of the ground system and be a parallel path that diverts much of the current from the coax headed to the shack. 4. Depending on the type of soil, distance between ground rods, type of antenna, etc., add 1 or 2 additional ground rods connected with radial wires. Ground rods are cheap and last a long time (in most soil). The earth isn't a very good conductor, especially at >1 MHz. See pdf page 35 in the Polyphaser book. 5. Connect your radio ground system to the electrical panel ground, per NEC requirements.s Steve, W3AHL ---In ic7000@..., wrote: On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:08:22 -0500, brian mackey wrote: >> > My ground is setup where all the gear goes to a grounding strip to a >> single >> > 8 foot ground round, and then the antenna is grounded to a separate 8 foot >> > ground rod (via) a lightning arrester > > Very bad practice. The separate ground rods should be BONDED together, preferably with wide copper strap. Your installation provides plenty of area for voltage differences. Someone also said they used a large braid for grounding. This is another bad idea. Braid has plenty of inductance. Inductance at high frequencies (rise time of the pulse) is high resistance. High resistance leads to high voltage between one end of it and the other. This is why solid copper grounds are recommended. Better yet, flat copper strap. And DON'T make it look neat with 90 degree bends in the wire, etc. It should be as straight as possible point to point, and when turns are needed, they need to be as gradual as possible (low inductance). Gary -- Web: http://ag0n.net NodeOp Page: http://ag0n.net/irlp Node 3055: http://ag0n.net/irlp/3055 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References
brian mackey
Great stuff thank you
Brian Mackey KC1MAC/AG Hams don't let hams get stuck on 2 meter repeaters! From: J Chaloupka <boltsnutspins@...> Reply-To: <ic7000@...> Date: Friday, January 10, 2014 at 9:19 AM To: "ic7000@..." <ic7000@...> Subject: Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References There is no easy answer, much reading and work are involved for a proper ground, to say nothing of the $$$ cost. Don't forget the maxim, "Pay me now or pay me later, but your going to pay", applies here. Here are some links for your reading: ction%20P1.pdf ction%20P2.pdf ction%20P3.pdf de, wd8qbq, JIM From: brian mackey <brian.mackey@...> To: ic7000@... Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 7:28 AM Subject: Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References Should the radials be buried as well or just spread out in a direction away from the house Brian Mackey KC1MAC/AG Hams don't let hams get stuck on 2 meter repeaters! From: <w3ahl@...> Reply-To: <ic7000@...> Date: Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 9:07 PM To: <ic7000@...> Subject: Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References Brian, I agree that approach has several problems, which are easily corrected. Without knowing the details of how long the coax, ground wires, etc. it is hard to quantify the degree of the problem. 1. A single ground rod can easily saturate the surrounding ground, at which point the charge remaining on the coax continues on directly to the radio. 2. Since the radio is connected to a separate ground rod, which is at a low earth potential (assuming it is some distance from the antenna's ground rod), all of the remaining current on the coax flows through the radio or tuner chassis en route to the "radio" ground rod. 3. It is likely the coax entering the structure will have a high enough voltage on the shield to arc over to nearby objects during an average strike of 18,000 amps and 2 microsecond rise time. Even outside, the coax can arc over to nearby objects, creating pinholes ( or worse) in the outer jacket, allowing water in. To correct the problem: 1. Move the lightning suppressor to the ground strip near the shack (assuming it is outside, if not add one outside). This will divert any induced charges generated by a nearby strike that couple into the coax from bypassing the suppressor. 2. Use a bulkhead barrel connector where the lightning suppressor was originally, to ground the coax shield. Mount it to a copper or stainless steel bracket clamped to the first ground rod. 3. Connect the two ground rods with a #6 bare copper wire, buried 6" or as deep as possible. This will reduce the dynamic surge impedance of the ground system and be a parallel path that diverts much of the current from the coax headed to the shack. 4. Depending on the type of soil, distance between ground rods, type of antenna, etc., add 1 or 2 additional ground rods connected with radial wires. Ground rods are cheap and last a long time (in most soil). The earth isn't a very good conductor, especially at >1 MHz. See pdf page 35 in the Polyphaser book. 5. Connect your radio ground system to the electrical panel ground, per NEC requirements.s Steve, W3AHL ---In ic7000@..., <mcduffie@...> wrote: On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:08:22 -0500, brian mackey wrote: Very bad practice. The separate ground rods should be BONDED together,> My ground is setup where all the gear goes to a grounding strip to a preferably with wide copper strap. Your installation provides plenty of area for voltage differences. Someone also said they used a large braid for grounding. This is another bad idea. Braid has plenty of inductance. Inductance at high frequencies (rise time of the pulse) is high resistance. High resistance leads to high voltage between one end of it and the other. This is why solid copper grounds are recommended. Better yet, flat copper strap. And DON'T make it look neat with 90 degree bends in the wire, etc. It should be as straight as possible point to point, and when turns are needed, they need to be as gradual as possible (low inductance). Gary -- Web: NodeOp Page: Node 3055: |
Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References
There is no easy answer, much reading and work are involved for a proper ground, to say nothing of the $$$ cost. ?Don't forget the maxim, "Pay me now or pay me later, but your going to pay", applies here. Here are some links for your reading: de, wd8qbq, JIM From: brian mackey To: ic7000@... Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 7:28 AM Subject: Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References
?
Should the radials be buried as well or just spread out in a direction
away from the house Brian Mackey KC1MAC/AG Hams don't let hams get stuck on 2 meter repeaters! From: Reply-To: Date: Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 9:07 PM To: Subject: Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References Brian, I agree that approach has several problems, which are easily corrected. Without knowing the details of how long the coax, ground wires, etc. it is hard to quantify the degree of the problem. 1. A single ground rod can easily saturate the surrounding ground, at which point the charge remaining on the coax continues on directly to the radio. 2. Since the radio is connected to a separate ground rod, which is at a low earth potential (assuming it is some distance from the antenna's ground rod), all of the remaining current on the coax flows through the radio or tuner chassis en route to the "radio" ground rod. 3. It is likely the coax entering the structure will have a high enough voltage on the shield to arc over to nearby objects during an average strike of 18,000 amps and 2 microsecond rise time. Even outside, the coax can arc over to nearby objects, creating pinholes ( or worse) in the outer jacket, allowing water in. To correct the problem: 1. Move the lightning suppressor to the ground strip near the shack (assuming it is outside, if not add one outside). This will divert any induced charges generated by a nearby strike that couple into the coax from bypassing the suppressor. 2. Use a bulkhead barrel connector where the lightning suppressor was originally, to ground the coax shield. Mount it to a copper or stainless steel bracket clamped to the first ground rod. 3. Connect the two ground rods with a #6 bare copper wire, buried 6" or as deep as possible. This will reduce the dynamic surge impedance of the ground system and be a parallel path that diverts much of the current from the coax headed to the shack. 4. Depending on the type of soil, distance between ground rods, type of antenna, etc., add 1 or 2 additional ground rods connected with radial wires. Ground rods are cheap and last a long time (in most soil). The earth isn't a very good conductor, especially at >1 MHz. See pdf page 35 in the Polyphaser book. 5. Connect your radio ground system to the electrical panel ground, per NEC requirements.s Steve, W3AHL ---In ic7000@..., wrote: On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:08:22 -0500, brian mackey wrote: >> > My ground is setup where all the gear goes to a grounding strip to a >> single >> > 8 foot ground round, and then the antenna is grounded to a separate 8 foot >> > ground rod (via) a lightning arrester > > Very bad practice. The separate ground rods should be BONDED together, preferably with wide copper strap. Your installation provides plenty of area for voltage differences. Someone also said they used a large braid for grounding. This is another bad idea. Braid has plenty of inductance. Inductance at high frequencies (rise time of the pulse) is high resistance. High resistance leads to high voltage between one end of it and the other. This is why solid copper grounds are recommended. Better yet, flat copper strap. And DON'T make it look neat with 90 degree bends in the wire, etc. It should be as straight as possible point to point, and when turns are needed, they need to be as gradual as possible (low inductance). Gary -- Web: http://ag0n.net NodeOp Page: http://ag0n.net/irlp Node 3055: http://ag0n.net/irlp/3055 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Re: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000
BT Yahoo!?2013
Hi Brian the difference is about 2 s points so why bother. there are some amplifiers out there which can be adapted like the furuno marine hf power amplifier. having accqired one it seems an like awful idea to to use it for the small difference it could make. costing some 2500 dollars us. Not that i paid that for it but it does make me think it needs to be used? for it's intended purpose.?????????? Best regards robert G6LLP ? From: brian mackey To: ic7000@... Sent: Friday, 10 January 2014, 12:15 Subject: Re: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000
?
Yes I use the ameritron 811hd
Brian Mackey KC1MAC/AG Hams don't let hams get stuck on 2 meter repeaters! From: Reply-To: Date: Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 8:02 PM To: Subject: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000 New member today. Anyone running a linear amp with the 7000? Would like to run it up to 250 watts - not finding much on the internet specific to myissue. |
Re: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000
I use an Ameritron, ALS600S, very nicely. wd8qbq, JIM From: brian mackey To: ic7000@... Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 7:15 AM Subject: Re: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000
?
Yes I use the ameritron 811hd
Brian Mackey KC1MAC/AG Hams don't let hams get stuck on 2 meter repeaters! From: Reply-To: Date: Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 8:02 PM To: Subject: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000 New member today. Anyone running a linear amp with the 7000? Would like to run it up to 250 watts - not finding much on the internet specific to myissue. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References
brian mackey
Should the radials be buried as well or just spread out in a direction
away from the house Brian Mackey KC1MAC/AG Hams don't let hams get stuck on 2 meter repeaters! From: <w3ahl@...> Reply-To: <ic7000@...> Date: Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 9:07 PM To: <ic7000@...> Subject: Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References Brian, I agree that approach has several problems, which are easily corrected. Without knowing the details of how long the coax, ground wires, etc. it is hard to quantify the degree of the problem. 1. A single ground rod can easily saturate the surrounding ground, at which point the charge remaining on the coax continues on directly to the radio. 2. Since the radio is connected to a separate ground rod, which is at a low earth potential (assuming it is some distance from the antenna's ground rod), all of the remaining current on the coax flows through the radio or tuner chassis en route to the "radio" ground rod. 3. It is likely the coax entering the structure will have a high enough voltage on the shield to arc over to nearby objects during an average strike of 18,000 amps and 2 microsecond rise time. Even outside, the coax can arc over to nearby objects, creating pinholes ( or worse) in the outer jacket, allowing water in. To correct the problem: 1. Move the lightning suppressor to the ground strip near the shack (assuming it is outside, if not add one outside). This will divert any induced charges generated by a nearby strike that couple into the coax from bypassing the suppressor. 2. Use a bulkhead barrel connector where the lightning suppressor was originally, to ground the coax shield. Mount it to a copper or stainless steel bracket clamped to the first ground rod. 3. Connect the two ground rods with a #6 bare copper wire, buried 6" or as deep as possible. This will reduce the dynamic surge impedance of the ground system and be a parallel path that diverts much of the current from the coax headed to the shack. 4. Depending on the type of soil, distance between ground rods, type of antenna, etc., add 1 or 2 additional ground rods connected with radial wires. Ground rods are cheap and last a long time (in most soil). The earth isn't a very good conductor, especially at >1 MHz. See pdf page 35 in the Polyphaser book. 5. Connect your radio ground system to the electrical panel ground, per NEC requirements.s Steve, W3AHL ---In ic7000@..., <mcduffie@...> wrote: On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:08:22 -0500, brian mackey wrote: Very bad practice. The separate ground rods should be BONDED together,> My ground is setup where all the gear goes to a grounding strip to a preferably with wide copper strap. Your installation provides plenty of area for voltage differences. Someone also said they used a large braid for grounding. This is another bad idea. Braid has plenty of inductance. Inductance at high frequencies (rise time of the pulse) is high resistance. High resistance leads to high voltage between one end of it and the other. This is why solid copper grounds are recommended. Better yet, flat copper strap. And DON'T make it look neat with 90 degree bends in the wire, etc. It should be as straight as possible point to point, and when turns are needed, they need to be as gradual as possible (low inductance). Gary -- Web: NodeOp Page: Node 3055: [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References
brian mackey
Thank you may be warm enough this weekend it snowing today but you are
right rods are cheap labor is free, but radio repairs Ouch! Brian Mackey KC1MAC/AG Hams don't let hams get stuck on 2 meter repeaters! From: <w3ahl@...> Reply-To: <ic7000@...> Date: Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 9:07 PM To: <ic7000@...> Subject: Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References Brian, I agree that approach has several problems, which are easily corrected. Without knowing the details of how long the coax, ground wires, etc. it is hard to quantify the degree of the problem. 1. A single ground rod can easily saturate the surrounding ground, at which point the charge remaining on the coax continues on directly to the radio. 2. Since the radio is connected to a separate ground rod, which is at a low earth potential (assuming it is some distance from the antenna's ground rod), all of the remaining current on the coax flows through the radio or tuner chassis en route to the "radio" ground rod. 3. It is likely the coax entering the structure will have a high enough voltage on the shield to arc over to nearby objects during an average strike of 18,000 amps and 2 microsecond rise time. Even outside, the coax can arc over to nearby objects, creating pinholes ( or worse) in the outer jacket, allowing water in. To correct the problem: 1. Move the lightning suppressor to the ground strip near the shack (assuming it is outside, if not add one outside). This will divert any induced charges generated by a nearby strike that couple into the coax from bypassing the suppressor. 2. Use a bulkhead barrel connector where the lightning suppressor was originally, to ground the coax shield. Mount it to a copper or stainless steel bracket clamped to the first ground rod. 3. Connect the two ground rods with a #6 bare copper wire, buried 6" or as deep as possible. This will reduce the dynamic surge impedance of the ground system and be a parallel path that diverts much of the current from the coax headed to the shack. 4. Depending on the type of soil, distance between ground rods, type of antenna, etc., add 1 or 2 additional ground rods connected with radial wires. Ground rods are cheap and last a long time (in most soil). The earth isn't a very good conductor, especially at >1 MHz. See pdf page 35 in the Polyphaser book. 5. Connect your radio ground system to the electrical panel ground, per NEC requirements.s Steve, W3AHL ---In ic7000@..., <mcduffie@...> wrote: On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:08:22 -0500, brian mackey wrote: Very bad practice. The separate ground rods should be BONDED together,> My ground is setup where all the gear goes to a grounding strip to a preferably with wide copper strap. Your installation provides plenty of area for voltage differences. Someone also said they used a large braid for grounding. This is another bad idea. Braid has plenty of inductance. Inductance at high frequencies (rise time of the pulse) is high resistance. High resistance leads to high voltage between one end of it and the other. This is why solid copper grounds are recommended. Better yet, flat copper strap. And DON'T make it look neat with 90 degree bends in the wire, etc. It should be as straight as possible point to point, and when turns are needed, they need to be as gradual as possible (low inductance). Gary -- Web: NodeOp Page: Node 3055: |
Re: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000
brian mackey
Yes I use the ameritron 811hd
Brian Mackey KC1MAC/AG Hams don't let hams get stuck on 2 meter repeaters! From: <esmorrison1@...> Reply-To: <ic7000@...> Date: Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 8:02 PM To: <ic7000@...> Subject: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000 New member today. Anyone running a linear amp with the 7000? Would like to run it up to 250 watts - not finding much on the internet specific to myissue. |
Re: [IC-7000] Powering up the 7000
The increase on the "other" end from 100 watts to 250 is precious little, waste of time, effort, and $$, better effort and $$ are spent on improving your antenna system and grounding on your current installation. If you do operate an amp with your IC-7000, make sure your amplifier keying voltage does not exceed the limits of your IC-7000, and fry your T/R relay's, trips to the repair shop can get pricy.........YMMV...........Mac On Thursday, January 9, 2014 11:39 PM, "esmorrison1@..." wrote: New member today. Anyone running a linear amp with the 7000? Would like to run it up to 250 watts - not finding much on the internet specific to myissue.
|
Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References
It sounds like your electrical Panel box was not grounded to the rods outside at the tower.? Was everything bonded together?? Tower/Radios/rotator control etc and the Mains.? If not you have a huge ground loop and the power fed back from the shack via the 120V plug ground into the panel box and then to everything else in your house.? The fact that the pocket knife spot welded itself means that the two radios are not at the same ground potential and that's another problem.
Rob |
Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References
On 09 Jan 2014 18:07:45 -0800, <w3ahl@...> wrote:
4. Depending on the type of soil, distance between ground rods, typeAlso, before installing extra ground rods and tying them together, read up on proper practice for doing so. I don't remember the exact rule, but multiple ground rods should be spaced at a specific distance apart, ideally in a ring around a central rod. For instance (only an example, not necessarily factual numbers), rods should be spaced a distance apart equal to twice the length of the rods. It has been years since I dealt with this, so I don't remember the exact rule. You might find it on the TowerTalk archives. The idea is to spread the pulse into the ground without saturating it like a single rod might do. Get to know about Cadwelding to bond the rods together with large conductors. Gary -- Web: NodeOp Page: Node 3055: |
Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References
Brian, I agree that approach has several problems, which are easily corrected. ?Without knowing the details of how long the coax, ground wires, etc. it is hard to quantify the degree of the problem. ? 1. ?A single ground rod can easily saturate the surrounding ground, at which point the charge remaining on the coax continues on directly to the radio. 2. ?Since the radio is connected to a separate ground rod, which is at a low earth potential (assuming it is some distance from the antenna's ground rod), all of the remaining current on the coax flows through the radio or tuner chassis en route to the "radio" ground rod. ?? 3. ?It is likely the coax entering the structure will have a high enough voltage on the shield to arc over to nearby objects during an average strike of 18,000 amps and 2 microsecond rise time. Even outside, the coax can arc over to nearby objects, creating pinholes ( or worse) in the outer jacket, allowing water in. To correct the problem: 1. ?Move the lightning suppressor to the ground strip near the shack (assuming it is outside, if not add one outside). ?This will divert any induced charges generated by a nearby strike that couple into the coax from bypassing the suppressor. ? 2. ?Use a bulkhead barrel connector where the lightning suppressor was originally, to ground the coax shield. ?Mount it to a copper or stainless steel bracket clamped to the first ground rod. 3. ?Connect the two ground rods with a #6 bare copper wire, buried 6" or as deep as possible. ?This will reduce the dynamic surge impedance of the ground system and be a parallel path that diverts much of the current from the coax headed to the shack.? 4. ?Depending on the type of soil, distance between ground rods, type of antenna, etc., add 1 or 2 additional ground rods connected with radial wires. ?Ground rods are cheap and last a long time (in most soil). ?The earth isn't a very good conductor, especially at >1 MHz. ?See pdf page 35 in the Polyphaser book. 5. ?Connect your radio ground system to the electrical panel ground, per NEC requirements.s Steve, W3AHL ---In ic7000@..., <mcduffie@...> wrote: On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:08:22 -0500, brian mackey wrote: > My ground is setup where all the gear goes to a grounding strip to a singleVery bad practice. The separate ground rods should be BONDED together, preferably with wide copper strap. Your installation provides plenty of area for voltage differences. Someone also said they used a large braid for grounding. This is another bad idea. Braid has plenty of inductance. Inductance at high frequencies (rise time of the pulse) is high resistance. High resistance leads to high voltage between one end of it and the other. This is why solid copper grounds are recommended. Better yet, flat copper strap. And DON'T make it look neat with 90 degree bends in the wire, etc. It should be as straight as possible point to point, and when turns are needed, they need to be as gradual as possible (low inductance). Gary -- Web: NodeOp Page: Node 3055: |
Re: [IC-7000] Lightning Protection References
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI¡¯ve been following the thread on lightning with great interest having had
the shack struck by lightning twice.?
?
As I result I have the following theory and I would like the ¡°experts¡± to
look it over.?
My tower sets just outside the shack and coax and cables enter directly
into the equipment via a short 20 ft. run.?
On one occasion all radios were connected as usual and the tower took a
direct strike.? The vertical 2 meter antenna on the top was blown all over
the neighborhood.?
Most of the electronic equipment in the house suffered some sort of
damage.? However, all of the damage can through the power lines.?
Anything with a choke or coil in the power supply was destroyed.? All of
the radios were connected to their antenna and non of them suffered any damage
to the antenna coils of associated circuitry.?
?
So here is my theory:
?
The tower provided a clear path to ground.? When the strike occurred
it dumped a HUGE pile of electrons to the tower.? As this large flow of
electrons ran to ground the tower acted as the primary of a large
transformer.? All of the house wiring in close proximity acted as the
secondary to the transformer.? A large voltage was induced into the house
wiring and thus through any equipment that was plugged in.? As this pile of
electrons dissipated the induced voltage reached levels that were high enough to
jump an open switch and smoke and choke.?
?
I had a pocket knife sitting on top of one of my rigs and it was touching
one of the other rigs.? It became spot welded to both chassis.? Both
rigs were hooked to the antennas and neither one suffered any damage to their
antenna circuitry.?
?
Now my question is:? How do you protect from this kind of
strike.?? The only thing I have done is add a number of extra ground
rods out and around of the tower and bond them al together and to the legs of
the tower.??? However, I offer this suggestion:? Tie a knot
in the equipment power cable.? Even better, tie two knots.? Any
inductance in the power line will stop the surge of current.? Make sure
that all equipment is grounded to a common point.
?
Anyone have any comments on my theory and suggestions??
?
Tom
WA0LRE
?
? |